27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sampl<strong>in</strong>g 159<br />

Probability Proportionate to Size<br />

The best estimates of a parameter are produced <strong>in</strong> samples taken from clusters<br />

of equal size. When clusters are not equal <strong>in</strong> size, then samples should be<br />

taken PPS—with probability proportionate to size.<br />

Suppose you had money and time to do 800 household <strong>in</strong>terviews <strong>in</strong> a city<br />

of 50,000 households. You <strong>in</strong>tend to select 40 blocks, out of a total of 280,<br />

and do 20 <strong>in</strong>terviews <strong>in</strong> each block. You want each of the 800 households <strong>in</strong><br />

the f<strong>in</strong>al sample to have exactly the same probability of be<strong>in</strong>g selected.<br />

Should each block be equally likely to be chosen for your sample? No,<br />

because census blocks never contribute equally to the total population from<br />

which you will take your f<strong>in</strong>al sample. A block that has 100 households <strong>in</strong> it<br />

should have twice the chance of be<strong>in</strong>g chosen for 20 <strong>in</strong>terviews as a block that<br />

has 50 households and half the chance of a block that has 200 households.<br />

When you get down to the block level, each household on a block with 100<br />

residences has a 20% (20/100) chance of be<strong>in</strong>g selected for the sample; each<br />

household on a block with 300 residences has only a 6.7% (20/300) chance of<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g selected.<br />

Lené Levy-Storms (1998, n.d.) wanted to talk to older Samoan women <strong>in</strong><br />

Los Angeles County about mammography. The problem was not that women<br />

were reticent to talk about the subject. The problem was: How do you f<strong>in</strong>d a<br />

representative sample of older Samoan women <strong>in</strong> Los Angeles County?<br />

From prior ethnographic research, Levy-Storms knew that Samoan women<br />

regularly attend churches where the m<strong>in</strong>ister is Samoan. She went to the president<br />

of the Samoan Federation of America <strong>in</strong> Carson, California, and he suggested<br />

n<strong>in</strong>e cities <strong>in</strong> L.A. County where Samoans were concentrated. There<br />

were 60 churches with Samoan m<strong>in</strong>isters <strong>in</strong> the n<strong>in</strong>e cities, represent<strong>in</strong>g n<strong>in</strong>e<br />

denom<strong>in</strong>ations. Levy-Storms asked each of the m<strong>in</strong>isters to estimate the number<br />

of female church members who were over 50. Based on these estimates,<br />

she chose a PPS sample of 40 churches (so that churches with more or fewer<br />

older women were properly represented). This gave her a sample of 299<br />

Samoan women over 50. This clever sampl<strong>in</strong>g strategy really worked: Levy-<br />

Storms contacted the 299 women and wound up with 290 <strong>in</strong>terviews—a 97%<br />

cooperation rate.<br />

PPS sampl<strong>in</strong>g is called for under three conditions: (1) when you are deal<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with large, unevenly distributed populations (such as cities that have high-rise<br />

and s<strong>in</strong>gle-family neighborhoods); (2) when your sample is large enough to<br />

withstand be<strong>in</strong>g broken up <strong>in</strong>to a lot of pieces (clusters) without substantially<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the sampl<strong>in</strong>g error; and (3) when you have data on the population

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!