27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Scales and Scal<strong>in</strong>g 321<br />

students’ knowledge of the material. Instead, students typically are asked a<br />

bunch of multiple-choice questions.<br />

Taken together, the reason<strong>in</strong>g goes, all the questions measure how well a<br />

student has mastered a body of material. If you take a test that has 60 multiplechoice<br />

questions and you get 45 correct, you get 45 po<strong>in</strong>ts, one for each correct<br />

answer. That number, 45 (or 75%), is a cumulative <strong>in</strong>dex of how well you<br />

did on the test.<br />

Note that <strong>in</strong> a cumulative <strong>in</strong>dex, it makes no difference which items are<br />

assigned to you. In a test of just 10 questions, for example, there are obviously<br />

just 10 ways to get one right—but there are 45 ways to get two right, 120 ways<br />

to get three right. . . . Students can get the same score of 80% on a test of 100<br />

questions and miss entirely different sets of 20 questions. This makes cumulative<br />

<strong>in</strong>dexes robust; they provide many ways to get at an underly<strong>in</strong>g variable<br />

(<strong>in</strong> the case of an exam, the underly<strong>in</strong>g variable is knowledge of the material).<br />

On the other hand, str<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g together a series of items to form an <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

doesn’t guarantee that the composite measure will be useful—any more than<br />

str<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g together a series of multiple-choice questions will fairly assess a student’s<br />

knowledge of, say, anthropology.<br />

We pretend that: (1) Knowledge is a unidimensional variable; (2) A fair<br />

set of questions is chosen to represent knowledge of some subject; and, therefore<br />

(3) A cumulative <strong>in</strong>dex is a fair test of the knowledge of that subject. We<br />

know that the system is imperfect, but we pretend <strong>in</strong> order to get on with life.<br />

We don’t have to pretend. When it comes to scal<strong>in</strong>g units of analysis on<br />

complex constructs—like scal<strong>in</strong>g countries on the construct of freedom or<br />

people on the construct of political conservatism—we can test the unidimensionality<br />

of an <strong>in</strong>dex with a technique called Guttman scal<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Guttman Scales<br />

In a Guttman scale, as compared to a cumulative <strong>in</strong>dex, the measurements<br />

for the items have a particular pattern <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the items measure a<br />

unidimensional variable. To understand the pattern we’re look<strong>in</strong>g for, consider<br />

the follow<strong>in</strong>g three questions.<br />

1. How much is 124 plus 14?<br />

2. How much is 1/2 1/3 1/5 2/11?<br />

3. If 3X 133, then how much is X?<br />

If you know the answer to question 3, you probably know the answer to<br />

questions 1 and 2. If you know the answer to question 2, but not to 3, it’s still

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!