27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Univariate Analysis 585<br />

would be normal and form a bell curve like the one at the top of figure 19.4<br />

and <strong>in</strong> figure 7.1.<br />

The unlikely means (the very large ones and the very small ones) show up<br />

<strong>in</strong> the narrow area under the tails of the curve, while the likely means (the<br />

ones closer to the true mean of the population) show up <strong>in</strong> the fat, middle part.<br />

In research, the question you want to answer is whether the means of variables<br />

from one, particular sample (the one you’ve got) probably represent the tails<br />

or the middle part of the curve.<br />

Hypothesis tests are two tailed when you are <strong>in</strong>terested only <strong>in</strong> whether the<br />

magnitude of some statistic is significant (i.e., whether you would have<br />

expected that magnitude by chance). When the direction of a statistic is not<br />

important, then a two-tailed test is called for.<br />

As we’ll see <strong>in</strong> chapter 20, however, when you predict that one of two<br />

means will be higher than the other (like predict<strong>in</strong>g that the mean of the f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

exam will be higher than the mean of the midterm exam <strong>in</strong> a class) you would<br />

use a one-tailed test. After all, you’d be ask<strong>in</strong>g only whether the mean was<br />

likely to fall <strong>in</strong> one tail of the normal distribution. Look at appendix C carefully.<br />

Scores significant at the .10 level for a two-tailed test are significant at<br />

the .05 level for a one-tailed test.<br />

4. F<strong>in</strong>ally, we determ<strong>in</strong>e the alpha level, written , which is the level of significance<br />

for the hypothesis test. Typically, alpha is set at the .05 level or at the .01<br />

level of significance. What this means is that if a mean or a proportion from a<br />

sample is likely to occur more than alpha—say, more than 5% of the time—then<br />

we fail to reject the null hypothesis.<br />

And conversely: If the mean or a proportion of a sample is likely to occur<br />

by chance less than alpha, then we reject the null hypothesis. Alpha def<strong>in</strong>es the<br />

critical region of a sampl<strong>in</strong>g distribution—that is, the fraction of the sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

distribution small enough to reject the null hypothesis.<br />

In neither case do we prove the research hypothesis, H 1 . We either reject or<br />

fail to reject the null hypothesis. Fail<strong>in</strong>g to reject the null hypothesis is the<br />

best we can do, s<strong>in</strong>ce, <strong>in</strong> a probabilistic science, we can’t ever really prove any<br />

research hypothesis beyond any possibility of be<strong>in</strong>g wrong.<br />

On Be<strong>in</strong>g Significant<br />

By custom—and only by custom—researchers generally accept as statistically<br />

significant any outcome that is not likely to occur by chance more than<br />

five times <strong>in</strong> a hundred tries. This p-value, or probability value, is called the<br />

.05 level of significance. Ap-value of .01 is usually considered very significant,<br />

and .001 is often labeled highly significant.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!