27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Foundations of Social <strong>Research</strong> 37<br />

do you measure future orientation or machismo? Measur<strong>in</strong>g variables like<br />

these is one of our biggest challenges because these variables are mostly what<br />

we’re <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong>.<br />

One of the most famous variables <strong>in</strong> all of social science is ‘‘socioeconomic<br />

status’’ (SES). Measur<strong>in</strong>g it is no easy task. You can use <strong>in</strong>come as one <strong>in</strong>dicator,<br />

but there are many wealthy people who have low SES (the so-called nouveau<br />

riche), and many relatively low-<strong>in</strong>come people who have high SES (th<strong>in</strong>k<br />

of those down-at-the-heels nobles <strong>in</strong> England who have to open their castles<br />

to tourists to make ends meet).<br />

You can add ‘‘level of education’’ to <strong>in</strong>come as an <strong>in</strong>dicator, but that still<br />

won’t be enough <strong>in</strong> most societies of the world to get at someth<strong>in</strong>g as multidimensional<br />

as SES. You can add occupation, father’s occupation, number of<br />

generations <strong>in</strong> a community, and so on, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the group you are study<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

and you still might w<strong>in</strong>d up dissatisfied with the result if your measure<br />

fails to predict some dependent variable of <strong>in</strong>terest.<br />

And, as you saw with the Bem androgyny scale earlier, <strong>in</strong>dicators of any<br />

concept may vary from culture to culture. This doesn’t mean that measurement<br />

is impossible. It means that you have to test (and, if necessary, adapt) every<br />

measure of every variable <strong>in</strong> every new culture where you want to use it.<br />

Conceptual and Operational Def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />

While most of the <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g variables <strong>in</strong> social science are concepts, some<br />

of our most important concepts are not variables. The concept of ‘‘positivism’’<br />

is not a variable, but the concept of ‘‘philosophies of science’’ is a variable,<br />

and positivism is one member of the list of those philosophies. The concept<br />

of ‘‘love’’ is not a variable, but the concept of ‘‘be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> love or not’’ is one.<br />

The concept of ‘‘culture’’ is not a variable, but the concept of ‘‘belong<strong>in</strong>g to a<br />

particular culture’’ is one. The concept of ‘‘attitude’’ is not a variable, but the<br />

concept of ‘‘support<strong>in</strong>g the idea that clitoridectomy is a violation of fundamental<br />

human rights’’implies an attitude variable with at least two attributes,<br />

support and nonsupport.<br />

Conceptual Def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />

There are two ways to def<strong>in</strong>e variables—conceptually and operationally.<br />

Conceptual def<strong>in</strong>itions are abstractions, articulated <strong>in</strong> words, that facilitate<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g. They are the sort of def<strong>in</strong>itions we see <strong>in</strong> dictionaries, and we

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!