27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

184 Chapter 7<br />

<strong>in</strong> a Mexican village to determ<strong>in</strong>e how many have ever worked illegally <strong>in</strong> the<br />

United States. How many of those men do you need to <strong>in</strong>terview to ensure a<br />

95% probability sample, with a 5% confidence <strong>in</strong>terval? Answer: S<strong>in</strong>ce we<br />

have no idea what the percentage is that we’re try<strong>in</strong>g to estimate, we set P and<br />

Q at .5 each <strong>in</strong> formula 7.5. Solv<strong>in</strong>g for n (sample size), we get:<br />

n (1.96) 2 (.5)(.5)/(.05) 2 384.16<br />

which we round up to 385. Then we apply the f<strong>in</strong>ite population correction:<br />

n <br />

385<br />

1(384/540) 225<br />

This is still a hefty percentage of the 540 people <strong>in</strong> the population, but it’s<br />

a lot smaller than the 385 called for by the standard formula.<br />

Settl<strong>in</strong>g for Bigger Confidence Intervals<br />

If we were will<strong>in</strong>g to settle for a 10% confidence <strong>in</strong>terval, we’d need only<br />

82 people <strong>in</strong> this example, but the trade-off would be substantial. If 65 out of<br />

225, or 29%, reported that they had worked illegally <strong>in</strong> the United States, we<br />

would be 68% confident that from 24% to 34% really did, and 95% confident<br />

that 19% to 39% did. But if 24 out of 82 (the same 29%) reported hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

participated <strong>in</strong> extreme sports, we’d be 68% confident that the true figure was<br />

between 19% and 39%, and 95% confident that it was between 9% and 49%.<br />

With a spread like that, you wouldn’t want to bet much on the sample statistic<br />

of 29%.<br />

If it weren’t for ethnography, this would be a major problem <strong>in</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g samples<br />

from small populations—the k<strong>in</strong>d we often study <strong>in</strong> anthropology. If<br />

you’ve been do<strong>in</strong>g ethnography <strong>in</strong> a community of 1,500 people for 6 months,<br />

however, you may feel comfortable tak<strong>in</strong>g a confidence <strong>in</strong>terval of 10%<br />

because you are personally (not statistically) confident that your <strong>in</strong>tuition<br />

about the group will help you <strong>in</strong>terpret the results of a small sample.<br />

Another Catch<br />

All of this discussion has been about estimat<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>gle parameters, whether<br />

proportions or means. You will often want to measure the <strong>in</strong>teraction among<br />

several variables at once. Suppose you study a population of wealthy, middleclass,<br />

and poor people. That’s three k<strong>in</strong>ds of people. Now add two sexes, male<br />

and female (that makes six k<strong>in</strong>ds of people) and two colors, black and white<br />

(that makes 12 k<strong>in</strong>ds). If you want to know how all those <strong>in</strong>dependent vari-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!