27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

556 Chapter 19<br />

people over 70? What is the average number of children <strong>in</strong> each household?<br />

How many people <strong>in</strong> your sample have extreme views on some key attitude<br />

questions?<br />

Table 19.2 shows the raw data for five variables and 30 respondents. These<br />

data come from a telephone survey that Gery Ryan, Stephen Borgatti, and I<br />

did of 609 adults <strong>in</strong> the United States (Bernard et al. 1999). Part of the survey<br />

was about people’s attitudes toward environmental activism. (The 30 respondents<br />

<strong>in</strong> table 19.2 are a random sample of the 609.)<br />

The first variable, gender, is a nom<strong>in</strong>al, or qualitative variable. The<br />

respondents were men and women over the age of 18, selected randomly from<br />

across the 48 cont<strong>in</strong>ental states of the United States. Men were coded as 1<br />

(GENDER male); women were coded as 2 (GENDER female). In statistics,<br />

qualitative description entails assign<strong>in</strong>g numbers to classes of th<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Those numbers, though—like 1 for male and 2 for female—are just substitute<br />

names for ‘‘male’’ and ‘‘female.’’ They are not quantities. The average of the<br />

1s and 2s <strong>in</strong> the column for GENDER <strong>in</strong> table 19.2 is 1.4, but that’s no more<br />

helpful than know<strong>in</strong>g the average telephone number <strong>in</strong> New York City.<br />

The second two variables are items that Kempton et al. (1995) used <strong>in</strong> their<br />

study of environmental values <strong>in</strong> America. My colleagues and I wanted to see<br />

if we could replicate their results. These ord<strong>in</strong>al variables are responses, on a<br />

scale of 1 to 5, to two statements:<br />

Americans are go<strong>in</strong>g to have to drastically reduce their level of consumption over<br />

the next few years.<br />

1 strongly disagree<br />

2 disagree<br />

3 neutral<br />

4 agree<br />

5 strongly agree<br />

Environmentalists wouldn’t be so gung-ho if it were their jobs that were threatened.<br />

1 strongly disagree<br />

2 disagree<br />

3 neutral<br />

4 agree<br />

5 strongly agree<br />

I’ve labeled the responses to the two items REDUCE and GUNGHO <strong>in</strong><br />

table 19.2. Notice that these two items are sort of opposites. The more you<br />

agree with REDUCE, the stronger your support for environmentalist issues is<br />

likely to be. But the more you agree with GUNGHO, the weaker your support<br />

for environmentalist issues is likely to be. If we want bigger numbers, like 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!