27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

226 Chapter 9<br />

Presentation of Self<br />

How should you present yourself <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>terview? As a friend? As a professional?<br />

As someone who is sympathetic or as someone who is nonjudgmental?<br />

It depends on the nature of the project. When the object is to collect comparable<br />

data across respondents, then it makes no difference whether you’re collect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

words or numbers—cordial-but-nonjudgmental is the way to go.<br />

That’s sometimes tough to do. You’re <strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g someone on a project<br />

about what people can do to help the environment, and your respondent says:<br />

‘‘All those eco-Nazis want is to make room for more owls. They don’t give a<br />

damn about real people’s jobs.’’ (Yes, that happened on one of my projects.)<br />

That’s when you f<strong>in</strong>d out whether you can probe without <strong>in</strong>ject<strong>in</strong>g your feel<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the <strong>in</strong>terview. Professional <strong>in</strong>terviewers (the folks who collect the<br />

data for the General Social Survey, for example) learn to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> their equilibrium<br />

and move on (see Converse and Schuman 1974).<br />

Some situations are so pa<strong>in</strong>ful, however, that it’s impossible to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a<br />

neutral facade. Gene Shelley <strong>in</strong>terviewed 72 people <strong>in</strong> Atlanta, Georgia, who<br />

were HIV-positive (Shelley et al. 1995). Here’s a typical comment by one of<br />

Shelly’s <strong>in</strong>formants: ‘‘I have a lot of trouble watch<strong>in</strong>g all my friends die.<br />

Sometimes my whole body shuts down <strong>in</strong>side. I don’t want to know people<br />

who are go<strong>in</strong>g to die. Some of my friends, there are three or four people a<br />

week <strong>in</strong> the obits. We all watch the obits.’’<br />

How would you respond? Do you say: ‘‘Uh-huh. Tell me more about that’’?<br />

Do you let silence take over and force the respondent to go on? Do you say<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g sympathetic? Shelley reports that she treated each <strong>in</strong>terview as a<br />

unique situation and responded as her <strong>in</strong>tuition told her to respond—<br />

sometimes more cl<strong>in</strong>ically, sometimes less, depend<strong>in</strong>g on her judgment of<br />

what the respondent needed her to say. Good advice.<br />

On Just Be<strong>in</strong>g Yourself<br />

In 1964, when we were work<strong>in</strong>g on the island of Kalymnos, my wife Carole<br />

would take our 2-month-old baby for daily walks <strong>in</strong> a carriage. Older women<br />

would peek <strong>in</strong>to the baby carriage and make disapprov<strong>in</strong>g noises when they<br />

saw our daughter sleep<strong>in</strong>g on her stomach. Then they would reach <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

carriage and turn the baby over, expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g forcefully that the baby would get<br />

the evil eye if we cont<strong>in</strong>ued to let her sleep on her stomach.<br />

Carole had read the latest edition of The Commonsense Book of Baby and<br />

Child Care (the classic baby book by Dr. Benjam<strong>in</strong> Spock). We carried two<br />

copies of the book with us—<strong>in</strong> case one fell out of a boat or someth<strong>in</strong>g—and<br />

Carole was conv<strong>in</strong>ced by Dr. Spock’s writ<strong>in</strong>gs that babies who sleep on their

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!