07.01.2013 Views

Sorted By Test Name - Mayo Medical Laboratories

Sorted By Test Name - Mayo Medical Laboratories

Sorted By Test Name - Mayo Medical Laboratories

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SYPGN<br />

32184<br />

of reverse screening results Patient history <strong>Test</strong> and result Interpretation Follow-up EIA/CIA/MFI RPR<br />

TP-PA Unknown history of syphilis Non-reactive N/A N/A No serologic evidence of syphilis None,<br />

unless clinically indicated (eg, early syphilis) Unknown history of syphilis Reactive Reactive N/A<br />

Untreated or recently treated syphilis See CDC treatment guidelines Unknown history of syphilis<br />

Reactive Non-reactive Non-reactive Probable false-positive screening test No follow-up testing, unless<br />

clinically indicated Unknown history of syphilis Reactive Non-reactive Reactive Possible syphilis (eg,<br />

early or latent) or previously treated syphilis Historical and clinical evaluation required Known history of<br />

syphilis Reactive Non-reactive Reactiveor N/A Past, successfully treated syphilis None CIA,<br />

chemiluminescence immunoassay; EIA, enzyme immunoassay; MFI, multiplex flow immunoassay; N/A,<br />

not applicable; RPR, rapid plasma reagin; TP-PA, Treponema pallidum particle agglutination.<br />

http://www.cdc.gov/std/treetment/2010/<br />

Reference Values:<br />

Negative<br />

Clinical References: 1. Tramont EC: Treponema pallidum (Syphilis). In Principles and Practice of<br />

Infectious Diseases. Fifth edition. Edited by GL Mandell, JE Bennet, R Dolin. New York Churchill<br />

Livingstone, 2000, pp 2474-2491 2. CDC. Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis<br />

screening-five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep<br />

2011;60(5):133-137 3. Binnicker MJ, Jespersen DJ, Rollins LO: Direct comparison of the traditional and<br />

reverse syphilis screening algorithms in a population with a low prevalence of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol<br />

2012 Jan;50(1):148-150<br />

Syphilis Antibody, IgG, Serum<br />

Clinical Information: Syphilis is a disease caused by infection with the spirochete Treponema<br />

pallidum. The infection is systemic and the disease is characterized by periods of latency. These features,<br />

together with the fact that Treponema pallidum cannot be isolated in culture, mean that serologic<br />

techniques play a major role in the diagnosis and follow-up of treatment for syphilis. Historically, the<br />

serologic testing algorithm for syphilis included an initial nontreponemal screening test, such as the rapid<br />

plasma reagin (RPR) or the venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) tests. Because these tests<br />

measure the host's antibody response to nontreponemal antigens, they lack specificity. Therefore, a<br />

positive result by RPR or VDRL requires confirmation by a treponemal-specific test, such as the<br />

fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorbed (FTA-ABS) or microhemagglutination assay (MHA-TP).<br />

Although the FTA-ABS and MHA-TP are technically simple to perform, they are labor intensive and<br />

require subjective interpretation by testing personnel. Recently, EIA and multiplex flow immunoassays<br />

(MFI) were introduced to assess serologic response to Treponema pallidum. The Bio-Rad BioPlex<br />

Syphilis IgG assay is an example of MFI technology, which utilizes specific, treponemal antigens coated<br />

on microspheres for the detection of IgG-class antibodies to Treponema pallidum. The BioPlex Syphilis<br />

IgG assay is highly sensitive and specific (see Supportive Data), and allows for an objective interpretation<br />

of results. Due to several factors including the low prevalence of syphilis in the United States, the<br />

increased specificity of treponemal assays, and the objective interpretation of MFI and EIA technology,<br />

initial serologic testing by a treponemal-specific assay (eg, EIA or MFI) is now commonly performed in<br />

clinical laboratories. Specimens testing positive by the treponemal-specific assay are then tested by RPR<br />

to provide supplementary serologic data, as well as to provide an indication of the patient's disease state<br />

and history of treatment. During early primary syphilis, the first antibodies to appear are of the IgM-class,<br />

with IgG-class antibodies reaching significant titers later in the primary phase. As the disease progresses<br />

into the secondary phase, IgG-class antibodies to Treponema pallidum reach peak titers, and may persist<br />

indefinitely regardless of the disease state or prior therapy. For prenatal syphilis screening, the IgG test is<br />

recommended. IgM testing should not be performed during routine pregnancy screening unless clinically<br />

indicated. Treponema pallidum IgG antibodies persist indefinitely, regardless of the course of the disease.<br />

If treatment of an original Treponema pallidum infection was not monitored, a diagnosis of reinfection<br />

may actually represent either a resurgence of an inadequately treated earlier infection or persistent IgG<br />

antibodies from a resolved infection.<br />

Useful For: An aid in the diagnosis of active Treponema pallidum infection Routine prenatal screening<br />

Interpretation: A positive IgG treponemal test suggests infection withTreponema pallidum at some<br />

Current as of January 4, 2013 7:15 pm CST 800-533-1710 or 507-266-5700 or <strong>Mayo</strong><strong>Medical</strong><strong>Laboratories</strong>.com Page 1666

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!