07.05.2013 Views

Prácticas de lectura y escritura - Universidades Lectoras

Prácticas de lectura y escritura - Universidades Lectoras

Prácticas de lectura y escritura - Universidades Lectoras

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Diagramas <strong>de</strong> ámbitos<br />

Se les pi<strong>de</strong> a los alumnos que sitúen esas experiencias<br />

que se han <strong>de</strong>tectado a través <strong>de</strong> los relojes <strong>de</strong> <strong>lectura</strong><br />

en alguno <strong>de</strong> estos tres ámbitos: la escuela, la familia, el<br />

entorno (barrio, amigos). También aquí se sorpren<strong>de</strong>n al<br />

ver cómo una gran cantidad <strong>de</strong> prácticas pertenecen a los<br />

ámbitos no “académicos”, y perciben la naturaleza <strong>de</strong> la alfabetización<br />

“académica” a que la escuela, el instituto o la<br />

universidad “somete” al alumno, y don<strong>de</strong>, por ejemplo, la<br />

<strong>lectura</strong> en voz alta o la <strong>escritura</strong> colaborativa, por ejemplo,<br />

no es lo que más se incita, dado que ambas prácticas tienen<br />

connotaciones que no suelen encajar bien con las priorida<strong>de</strong>s<br />

<strong>de</strong>l ámbito académico.<br />

Sobre la metodología empleada por investigadores <strong>de</strong><br />

los nuevos estudios <strong>de</strong> literacidad como Gregg Mannion: 5<br />

5 Literacies for Learning in Further Education: promoting inclusive learning<br />

across boundaries through stu<strong>de</strong>nts’ literacy practices http://www.<br />

leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/161740.htm.<br />

The methodology informing this project is broadly – ethnographic, hermeneutic<br />

and refl exive. We are trying to obtain “thick <strong>de</strong>scription” from<br />

the insi<strong>de</strong> rather than merely act as observers from the outsi<strong>de</strong>. For this<br />

reason, a participatory approach imbued the methods and <strong>de</strong>sign though<br />

not all are “members” of the research team in the same way and there is<br />

a continuum between those who are more like “respon<strong>de</strong>nts” and those<br />

who are more like “researchers”. Here our aim is to support participants<br />

in becoming ethnographers of their own experience. The project is hermeneutic<br />

insofar as we recognise the recursive role of interpretation in<br />

the un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of social practices, that is, the ways in which un<strong>de</strong>rstanding<br />

is mobilised through the interrelationships between persons and<br />

artifacts and that these un<strong>de</strong>rstandings help to shape future practices.<br />

This has resulted in a mixed method approach to the project as a whole.<br />

In phase 2 one method of a number <strong>de</strong>vised to capture data on stu<strong>de</strong>nt’s<br />

sense of their own literacy practices was the “Icon Mapping Exercise”.<br />

The rationale here is to explore stu<strong>de</strong>nts’ own un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the interrelated<br />

process of learning, recontextualization and i<strong>de</strong>ntifi cation. The<br />

method <strong>de</strong>scribed was <strong>de</strong>vised so that it allowed respon<strong>de</strong>nts to explore<br />

how these processes relate through the lens of literacy. In the fi rst phase of<br />

Eloy M. Núñez - Alberto E. M. García - Mar C. Fernán<strong>de</strong>z - Gabriel Núñez<br />

283

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!