09.01.2015 Views

spartans_in_darkness

spartans_in_darkness

spartans_in_darkness

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EO 1.4. (c)<br />

Tefl SEeRETtYeeMINT/IX 1<br />

108. (~//~O DSN-414T, 041115ZAugust 1964.<br />

109. (~//~O DSM-626J, 0411402 August 1964.<br />

110. (S//Sl) 2/Gll/VHN/R13-64, 041440Z August<br />

1964. It is possible that this <strong>in</strong>tercept was the miss<strong>in</strong>g<br />

part of the message sent earlier and construed as the<br />

"attack" order.<br />

111. (S//SI) 2/Q/yHN/T163-64, 090328Z August<br />

1964.<br />

112. (~//~O 2/Gll/VHN/R17-64, 041820ZAugust<br />

1964.<br />

113. (SHSI) 2/Q/VHN/R42-64, 041900Z August<br />

1964.<br />

114.fStCTD 77.12 Z 041240ZAugust 1964.<br />

115. (SHSI) 2/Q/VHN/T128-64 041838Z August<br />

1964.<br />

116. (S//SI) Ibid.<br />

117. (TS//SI) 3/0/yHN/ROl-64, 5 August 1964.<br />

118. CD) Marelda, 408; bomb damage assessments<br />

from 5 August <strong>in</strong>dicate that some P-4s may have been<br />

at Quang Khe. However, there is no SIGINT reflection<br />

to support any activity dur<strong>in</strong>g this period by P-4s <strong>in</strong><br />

the Southern Naval Command.<br />

119. (~//SI) 2/G11/VHN/R16-64, 04i746ZAugust<br />

1964.<br />

120. tst JCS Z ° 041628Z August 1964, CCH<br />

Series vl.HH.24.1O.<br />

121. ES//SI) 2/Gll/VHN/R15-64, 041745Z August<br />

1964.<br />

122. (S//SI) DIRNSA, 070118Z August 1964.<br />

123. (S//SI) DS-467N, 070615Z, August 1964.<br />

124. (S//Sl) 2/Q/VHN/T151-64, 080324Z August<br />

1964. ~CA ACC# 45359Z.<br />

125. (S;,/~I) 2/Q/VHN/T152-64, 080440Z August<br />

1964, NCA ACC# 45359Z.<br />

126. (S//8I) 2/0/VHN/R11-64, Spot Report 3<br />

September 1964.<br />

127. (el/SI) Ibid.<br />

128. ES//8I) OlC, DSN-467N.<br />

129. ES//SI) Ibid.<br />

130. ETSl/S!) COMNAVFORJAPAN, "Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

All Source Evaluation Maddox Patrol," 120230Z<br />

October 1964.<br />

131. CD) Moise, 163-164.<br />

132. (D) Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, The Complete<br />

Sherlock Holmes (Garden City, New York: Doubleday<br />

& Company, 1930),347.<br />

133. (D) Moise, 201.<br />

134. (D) OlC DSN-.467N.<br />

135. (9//90 2/Q/VHN/T126-64, 030450Z August<br />

1964; attached worksheet 1609-64, DSN-414T. NCA<br />

ACC# 45359Z, DSN-27 1964 translations. Also, see<br />

2/Gll/VHN/R06-64, 0221272 August 1964.<br />

136. (~//~I) 2/Q/VHN/R39-64, 041646Z August<br />

1964. This serialized report was sent at a precedence<br />

("ZZ") reserved for Critics. This was a technical error<br />

and did not affect warn<strong>in</strong>g or timel<strong>in</strong>ess. However, it<br />

makes track<strong>in</strong>g down the reportsmore difficult.<br />

137. CD) Moise, 200.<br />

138. (SHSI) B26 COMINT Technical Report<br />

#009-65,1 129 March 1965,<br />

CCH SerieL-s":'X;';'I;""I.NN=:-.<br />

...J<br />

139. CD) Moise, 200; Lyndon B. Johnson, 114.<br />

('f~//9I) In the matter of who the "experts" were that<br />

President Johnson is referr<strong>in</strong>g to, it appears that they<br />

were members of the White House Intelligence<br />

Advisory Staff. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to one source, they exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

"all available <strong>in</strong>telligence hav<strong>in</strong>g even the most<br />

remote relevance [to the Gulf of Tonk<strong>in</strong>]." Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to this source, SIGINT alone provided "positive evidence<br />

of DRV premeditation." Whether this evidence<br />

refers to the 2 or 4 August <strong>in</strong>cidents is unclear. It is<br />

also not certa<strong>in</strong> if all "relevant <strong>in</strong>telligence" was pursued.<br />

Furthermore, it is not clear if any of the "experts"<br />

were Vietnamese l<strong>in</strong>guists, or if they were be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

prompted by the analysts at NSA. Source: NSA<br />

Memorandum for the Record: "Interview with Mr.<br />

Arthur McCafferty, White House Staff, on the use of<br />

SIGINT <strong>in</strong> Shap<strong>in</strong>g White House Decisions on<br />

Southeast Asia," CCH Series XII.NN., undated.<br />

140. (S//Sl) 2/Q/VHN/R39-64.<br />

141. (S//S1) For identity of LAP, see 2/Q/VHN/<br />

T123-64; for TRi\ see 2/Q/VHN/T134, 135-64.<br />

Callwords/covernarnes were used to designate units,<br />

entities, and <strong>in</strong>dividuals. It was not uncommon to see<br />

a particular entity, such as T-142, addressed with as<br />

many as three callwords over this period. However,<br />

these callwords equated to any number of differ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

entities that would have been aboard.<br />

142. (Sl/S!) The miss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tercept would have<br />

arrived <strong>in</strong> the form of so-called technical supplements<br />

to the San Miguel reports "38" and "39." Generally<br />

these supplements were sent anywhere from fifteen to<br />

Tefl SEeRHNeeMINTIIX1 Page 227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!