09.01.2015 Views

spartans_in_darkness

spartans_in_darkness

spartans_in_darkness

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TOil 8EeftE1iteOMINfNX1<br />

the Central Highlands, when Westmoreland,<br />

after be<strong>in</strong>g briefed on that morn<strong>in</strong>g's fight<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

the prediction that more could come the next day,<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ally warned his field commanders to the danger.<br />

Only then were American units placed on<br />

alert. Westmoreland also advised the South<br />

Vietnamese military to recall their troops who<br />

were on leave for Tet. The thirty-six-hour ceasefire<br />

with the communists was then cancelled.P"<br />

(U) It is this "premature" attack that we will<br />

discuss next, for there is some <strong>in</strong>dication from<br />

SIGINT that it may have actually been planned all<br />

along.<br />

(U) The Mystery ofthe 30 January<br />

"Premature" Attacks<br />

~Onthe morn<strong>in</strong>g of 30 January (the 29th <strong>in</strong><br />

Wash<strong>in</strong>gton), between 0100 and 0500 hours, a<br />

number of communist units attacked po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong><br />

the prov<strong>in</strong>cial capitals <strong>in</strong> Pleiku, Quang Tri,<br />

Darlac, and Khanh Hoa. Communist sapper<br />

teams struck at the U.S. <strong>in</strong>stallations at Danang,<br />

Nha Trang, and Cam Ranh Bay. The attacks of the<br />

30th, which tipped Hanoi's hand to MACV and<br />

thereby doomed the major assaults on 31<br />

January, have been the subject of much speculation,<br />

and several theories have been floated to<br />

expla<strong>in</strong> them. One suggestion is that the units<br />

which attacked on the 30th <strong>in</strong> Pleiku Prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

and on the coast at Nha Trang were confused<br />

about the actual start of operations. Another theory<br />

holds that the units <strong>in</strong>volved acted <strong>in</strong>dependently,<br />

perhaps react<strong>in</strong>g to a possible compromise<br />

of operations.P''<br />

CU) What appears to have happened is that<br />

the orig<strong>in</strong>al timetable for TCK/TCN was planned<br />

to co<strong>in</strong>cide with a Tet holiday truce proposed by<br />

Hanoi that extended from 27 January to 3<br />

February. This week-long period would allow the<br />

communists a cushion <strong>in</strong> which all f<strong>in</strong>al preparations<br />

for the assaults could be completed. At the<br />

same time, this extended truce permitted NLF<br />

cadre to organize demonstrations <strong>in</strong> Saigon itse<br />

which would complement the military assault.l"<br />

CU) However, General Westmorelaru<br />

changed his m<strong>in</strong>d on the length of the Tet truce<br />

As early as 16 January, he and General Vien, th.<br />

chief of staff of the South Vietnamese Army<br />

approached President Thieu with the suggester<br />

change. Although Thieu <strong>in</strong>itially hesitated, he<br />

agreed to the change. The communist <strong>in</strong>telligence<br />

apparatus got w<strong>in</strong>d of the shortened truce period<br />

On 28 January, Westmoreland <strong>in</strong>formed hi:<br />

commanders that the truce would run only frorr<br />

1800 hours on 29 January to 0600 hours on 31<br />

January. This thirty-six-hour 'w<strong>in</strong>dow forced the<br />

communist command to radically change its own<br />

timetable by mov<strong>in</strong>g up the start date even<br />

though many units would not be fully prepared.<br />

155<br />

CU) Hanoi settled for a new attack date, which<br />

appears to have been 31 January. But there is<br />

some confusion over how this date was selected <strong>in</strong><br />

the first place. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to communist sources,<br />

Hanoi had ordered another MR command, the<br />

Tri Thien-Hue Military Region to beg<strong>in</strong> the attack<br />

on the Lunar New Year or 31 January. However,<br />

South Vietnam was us<strong>in</strong>g a revised calendar <strong>in</strong><br />

which the new year began on 30 January.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to these same sources, the Tri Thien­<br />

Hue Military Region used the revised calendar<br />

1~6<br />

and set the attacks for 30 January." The problem<br />

with this explanation is that the attacks on<br />

30 January occurred solely <strong>in</strong> Military Region 5<br />

and not <strong>in</strong> the Tri Thien-Hue Military Region,<br />

which consisted of the prov<strong>in</strong>ces immediately to<br />

the north.<br />

OGA<br />

(5//81) The evidenceJora change <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Ii:IClli:r<br />

attack date exists <strong>in</strong>/both SIGn~l and collateral<br />

e s01lices·1<br />

tief<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the mIddle of February earned<br />

t e III ormation that a document captured on 9<br />

February <strong>in</strong>dicated that the date of the <strong>in</strong>itiation<br />

of the offensive had been postponed shortly<br />

I<br />

Page 334<br />

TOP SE6RETlf60MIPHl/X1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!