27.03.2015 Views

o_19heefouak9i9v4do11ac41pi7a.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

KONSTANTINOS I. LOIZOS<br />

Figure 1: Net interest margin<br />

Source: Author’s calculations<br />

Table 1 gives a clearer picture of the evolution of the ratio. Observe that the indicator<br />

rises in median terms for ETEBA. We use the median to avoid the outlier effect<br />

of the very large initial value of the ratio. However, on average, the NIM falls<br />

for ETBA at least in the last period and for Investment Bank during the whole period<br />

of operation.<br />

Table 1: Net interest margins: summary statistics<br />

ETEBA Investment Bank ETBA<br />

1964-74 1975-86 1987-2001 1963-74 1976-86 1987-92 1967-74 1975-86 1987-2002<br />

Mean 0.16 0.05 0.09 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.01<br />

Median 0.05 0.06 0.10 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04<br />

Std. Dev. 0.28 0.02 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.06<br />

Min. 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.00 -0.04 0.00 0.02 -0.09<br />

Max. 0.97 0.08 0.17 0.06 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.09 0.11<br />

The NIM is a measure of profitability exclusively focused on the financial aspect<br />

of earnings and expenses in respect of the relevant assets and hence, on the kinds of<br />

operation that are characteristic of a banking institution. Given this measure of performance,<br />

ETEBA sees its margin rising over time, while ETBA and Investment<br />

Bank exhibit, on average, a falling trend. Furthermore, the NIM reaches an average<br />

level of 0.09 or 9% for ETEBA during the deregulation period, while for the same<br />

period ETBA exhibits even negative values with an average of only 0.01 or 1%.<br />

~ 234 ~

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!