Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ANTONELLA VIOLA<br />
especially those of the major seaports– reveals the rise of India as the most important<br />
site for British business activities overseas. From 1830 onwards the presence<br />
of British private traders in South Asia grew remarkably, with a significant acceleration<br />
after 1858. 10 In nineteenth-century India, British commercial and economic<br />
activities mainly took one of two forms: British-registered companies, and Indianregistered<br />
companies. 11 The former were companies headquartered in Great Britain<br />
which handled several business activities abroad, usually in no more than one<br />
county; 12 the latter were companies established by Britons resident in India. In<br />
addition to these two categories, in nineteenth-century India there were also British<br />
overseas banks, multinational companies which had partly outsourced their<br />
activities to the colonies, and other business enterprises. There were also some international<br />
trading companies (forerunners of present-day multinationals), which<br />
operated through a network of agents and branch offices all over Asia and owned<br />
assets in India as well as in other Asian countries. All these firms had close links<br />
with the London credit market and with British overseas banks, and generally<br />
speaking their activities were profoundly embedded in the British imperial system.<br />
London, the core of the empire, was also the hub of those firms’ business. By<br />
looking at the flows of capital between Great Britain, its colonies and the rest of<br />
the world, Chapman has defined these companies, and above all the merchant<br />
elite behind them, as ‘investment groups ’, 13 stressing their ties with the British<br />
financial environment of the mid-nineteenth century. Jones has proposed a more<br />
comprehensive definition centred around the concept of ‘business groups,’ 14 regarded<br />
as groups which did not perform a mere financial function, but rather a<br />
set of economic and commercial activities within the territories of the empire.<br />
These groups were defined by an array of similar socio-economic attitudes and<br />
practices, which made them an easily identifiable category of economic operators.<br />
Anglo-Greek companies which moved to India joined the club of British business<br />
enterprises, participating fully in the prosperous and profitable Anglo-Indian trade.<br />
Very often these Greek companies were true multinationals which handled activities<br />
not only in India or in Great Britain, but in many other places. The most well-known<br />
10 In 1858 the British parliament passed the Government of India Act, which dismantled<br />
the East India Company and devolved the administration of the Indian territories to the British<br />
crown.<br />
11 M. Wilkins has defined British expatriate firms as ‘free-standing companies’. See Wilkins,<br />
M. and Schoter, H. (eds), The Free-standing company in the world economy, 1830-1996,<br />
Oxford, 1998.<br />
12 These economic operators were often country-oriented firms.<br />
13 Chapman, S.D, ‘British-based investments groups before 1914’, in The Economic History<br />
Review, Vol. 38 (May 1985), pp. 230-51; ‘Investment groups in India and South Africa’, The<br />
Economic History Review, Vol. 40. (May 1987), pp. 275-80.<br />
14 Jones, G. and Wale, J., Merchants as business groups: British trading companies in Asia before<br />
1945, University of Reading Working Papers, 1998; Jones, G., Merchants to Multinationals:<br />
British trading companies in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Oxford, 2000.<br />
~ 412 ~