21.01.2022 Views

Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences by Frederick J. Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau ISBN 10: 1305504917 ISBN 13: 9781305504912

Statistics is one of the most practical and essential courses that you will take, and a primary goal of this popular text is to make the task of learning statistics as simple as possible. Straightforward instruction, built-in learning aids, and real-world examples have made STATISTICS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 10th Edition the text selected most often by instructors for their students in the behavioral and social sciences. The authors provide a conceptual context that makes it easier to learn formulas and procedures, explaining why procedures were developed and when they should be used. This text will also instill the basic principles of objectivity and logic that are essential for science and valuable in everyday life, making it a useful reference long after you complete the course.

Statistics is one of the most practical and essential courses that you will take, and a primary goal of this popular text is to make the task of learning statistics as simple as possible. Straightforward instruction, built-in learning aids, and real-world examples have made STATISTICS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 10th Edition the text selected most often by instructors for their students in the behavioral and social sciences. The authors provide a conceptual context that makes it easier to learn formulas and procedures, explaining why procedures were developed and when they should be used. This text will also instill the basic principles of objectivity and logic that are essential for science and valuable in everyday life, making it a useful reference long after you complete the course.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

330 CHAPTER 10 | The t Test for Two Independent Samples

7. Research results suggest a relationship between the

TV viewing habits of 5-year-old children and their

future performance in high school. For example,

Anderson, Huston, Wright, and Collins (1998) report

that high school students who regularly watched

Sesame Street as children had better grades in high

school than their peers who did not watch Sesame

Street. Suppose that a researcher intends to examine

this phenomenon using a sample of 20 high school

students.

The researcher first surveys the students’ parents to

obtain information on the family’s TV viewing habits

during the time that the students were 5 years old. Based

on the survey results, the researcher selects a sample

of n = 10 students with a history of watching “Sesame

Street” and a sample of n = 10 students who did not

watch the program. The average high school grade is

recorded for each student and the data are as follows:

Watched Sesame

Street

Average High School Grade

Did Not Watch Sesame

Street

86 99 90 79

87 97 89 83

91 94 82 86

97 89 83 81

98 92 85 92

n = 10 n = 10

M = 93 M = 85

SS = 200 SS = 160

Use an independent-measures t test with α = .01

to determine whether there is a significant difference

between the two types of high school student.

8. It appears that there is some truth to the old adage

“That which doesn’t kill us makes us stronger.”

Seery, Holman, and Silver (2010) found that individuals

with some history of adversity report better

mental health and higher well-being compared to

people with little or no history of adversity. In an

attempt to examine this phenomenon, a researcher

surveys a group of college students to determine the

negative life events that they experienced in the past

5 years and their current feeling of well-being. For

n = 18 participants with 2 or fewer negative experiences,

the average well-being score is M = 42

with SS = 398, and for n = 16 participants with

5 to 10 negative experiences the average score is

M = 48.6 with SS = 370.

a. Is there a significant difference between the two

populations represented by these two samples? Use

a two-tailed test with α = .01.

b. Compute Cohen’s d to measure the size of the

effect.

c. Write a sentence demonstrating how the outcome

of the hypothesis test and the measure of effect

size would appear in a research report.

9. Does posting calorie content for menu items affect

people’s choices in fast food restaurants? According

to results obtained by Elbel, Gyamfi, and Kersh

(2011), the answer is no. The researchers monitored

the calorie content of food purchases for children and

adolescents in four large fast food chains before and

after mandatory labeling began in New York City.

Although most of the adolescents reported noticing

the calorie labels, apparently the labels had no effect

on their choices. Data similar to the results obtained

show an average of M = 786 calories per meal with

s = 85 for n = 100 children and adolescents before

the labeling, compared to an average of M = 772

calories with s = 91 for a similar sample of n = 100

after the mandatory posting.

a. Use a two-tailed test with α = .05 to determine

whether the mean number of calories after the

posting is significantly different than before calorie

content was posted.

b. Calculate r 2 to measure effect size for the mean

difference.

10. In 1974, Loftus and Palmer conducted a classic study

demonstrating how the language used to ask a question

can influence eyewitness memory. In the study,

college students watched a film of an automobile

accident and then were asked questions about what

they saw. One group was asked, “About how fast were

the cars going when they smashed into each other?”

Another group was asked the same question except

the verb was changed to “hit” instead of “smashed

into.” The “smashed into” group reported significantly

higher estimates of speed than the “hit” group.

Suppose a researcher repeats this study with a sample

of today’s college students and obtains the following

results.

Smashed into

Estimated Speed

Hit

n = 15 n = 15

M = 40.8 M = 34.0

SS = 510 SS = 414

a. Do the results indicate a significantly higher estimated

speed for the “smashed into” group? Use a

one-tailed test with α = .01.

b. Compute the estimated value for Cohen’s d to

measure the size of the effect.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!