21.01.2022 Views

Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences by Frederick J. Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau ISBN 10: 1305504917 ISBN 13: 9781305504912

Statistics is one of the most practical and essential courses that you will take, and a primary goal of this popular text is to make the task of learning statistics as simple as possible. Straightforward instruction, built-in learning aids, and real-world examples have made STATISTICS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 10th Edition the text selected most often by instructors for their students in the behavioral and social sciences. The authors provide a conceptual context that makes it easier to learn formulas and procedures, explaining why procedures were developed and when they should be used. This text will also instill the basic principles of objectivity and logic that are essential for science and valuable in everyday life, making it a useful reference long after you complete the course.

Statistics is one of the most practical and essential courses that you will take, and a primary goal of this popular text is to make the task of learning statistics as simple as possible. Straightforward instruction, built-in learning aids, and real-world examples have made STATISTICS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 10th Edition the text selected most often by instructors for their students in the behavioral and social sciences. The authors provide a conceptual context that makes it easier to learn formulas and procedures, explaining why procedures were developed and when they should be used. This text will also instill the basic principles of objectivity and logic that are essential for science and valuable in everyday life, making it a useful reference long after you complete the course.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION 12.5 | Post Hoc Tests 393

12.5 Post Hoc Tests

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

9. Describe the circumstances in which posttests are necessary and explain what the

tests accomplish.

As noted earlier, the primary advantage of ANOVA (compared to t tests) is it allows

researchers to test for significant mean differences when there are more than two treatment

conditions. ANOVA accomplishes this feat by comparing all the individual mean

differences simultaneously within a single test. Unfortunately, the process of combining

several mean differences into a single test statistic creates some difficulty when it is time to

interpret the outcome of the test. Specifically, when you obtain a significant F-ratio (reject

H 0

), it simply indicates that somewhere among the entire set of mean differences there is

at least one that is statistically significant. In other words, the overall F-ratio only tells you

that a significant difference exists; it does not tell exactly which means are significantly

different and which are not.

In Example 12.2 we presented an independent-measures study using three samples to

compare three strategies for studying in preparation for a test: rereading the material to be

tested, answering prepared questions on the material, creating and answering your own

questions. The three sample means were M 1

= 5, M 2

= 9, and M 3

= 10. In this study there

are three mean differences:

1. There is a 4-point difference between M 1

and M 2

.

2. There is a 1-point difference between M 2

and M 3

.

3. There is a 5-point difference between M 1

and M 3

.

The ANOVA used to evaluate these data produced a significant F-ratio indicating that at

least one of the sample mean differences is large enough to satisfy the criterion of statistical

significance. In this example, the 5-point difference is the biggest of the three and,

therefore, it must indicate a significant difference between the first treatment and the third

treatment (μ 1

≠ μ 3

). But what about the 4-point difference? Is it also large enough to be

significant? And what about the 1-point difference between M 2

and M 3

? Is it also significant?

The purpose of post hoc tests is to answer these questions.

DEFINITION

Post hoc tests (or posttests) are additional hypothesis tests that are done after an

ANOVA to determine exactly which mean differences are significant and which are not.

As the name implies, post hoc tests are done after an ANOVA. More specifically, these

tests are done after ANOVA when

1. You reject H 0

and

2. there are three or more treatments (k ≥ 3).

Rejecting H 0

indicates that at least one difference exists among the treatments. If there are

only two treatments, then there is no question about which means are different and, therefore,

no need for posttests. However, with three or more treatments (k ≥ 3), the problem is

to determine exactly which means are significantly different.

■ Posttests and Type I Errors

In general, a post hoc test enables you to go back through the data and compare the individual

treatments two at a time. In statistical terms, this is called making pairwise comparisons.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!