13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

extensive tree planting and suburban style planning<br />

into a “garden town” while some departures from<br />

Griffin’s recommendations for the allocation of land<br />

uses and placement of buildings were set in motion.<br />

With less than 100 houses by 1924, the pace of<br />

development had to quicken if the federal parliament<br />

was to meet in the national capital within the three<br />

years stipulated by the government. The gazettal of<br />

Griffin’s scheme as a road plan in 1925 paid lip service<br />

to the richness of his planning vision but nonetheless<br />

established the geometric framework for later<br />

planning—notably the central “parliamentary triangle.”<br />

The same year a new Federal Capital<br />

Commission was appointed. This was a powerful<br />

body with ample financing, a large number of staff,<br />

and full corporate control over planning, construction,<br />

maintenance, and general administration. It<br />

achieved the goal of opening the first (albeit temporary)<br />

parliament house in 1927. The wider nation<br />

was still skeptical about the concept of a remote but<br />

indulged “bush capital” for privileged politicians<br />

and elite public servants, an antagonism that<br />

remains.<br />

After the job was done, the commission was<br />

disbanded and Canberra’s population declined<br />

with the onset of the Great Depression. From 1930<br />

until the late 1950s the planning and administration<br />

of Canberra was divided among several federal<br />

ministries including Home Affairs and Works.<br />

A city administrator provided a semblance of coordination<br />

alongside the National Capital Planning<br />

and Development Committee. Critics still complained<br />

about “a good sheep station spoiled.”<br />

There were few new major public buildings, the<br />

Australian War Memorial (1941) being a notable<br />

exception; it is now one of Australia’s major<br />

domestic tourist attractions. The city had a diffuse<br />

garden suburb character, but even this was threatened<br />

by severe housing shortages as it became<br />

established as a national center for military operations<br />

during World War II.<br />

The National Capital<br />

Development Commission<br />

Political embarrassment at the state of the city led<br />

to a crucial 1955 inquiry by a Senate committee.<br />

The major recommendation was to create a single<br />

central authority with sufficient finance and power<br />

to carry out a balanced, long-term program of<br />

Canberra, Australia<br />

103<br />

urban development. The resultant National Capital<br />

Development Commission (NCDC), guided initially<br />

by advice from British planning authority<br />

William Holford, transformed Canberra from a<br />

small garden town into Australia’s largest noncoastal<br />

city and a planned metropolis of international<br />

significance. Population growth was fueled<br />

by a major relocation program of public servants<br />

from Melbourne in the 1960s, Canberra’s socalled<br />

golden era.<br />

The NCDC was effectively a new town corporation<br />

with extraordinary powers buttressed by<br />

public land ownership. For the first time since the<br />

early Griffin period, Canberra again became a<br />

national center for planning innovation. By the<br />

1970s the city was also the exemplar of a national<br />

policy of planned urban decentralization. Planning<br />

was dominated by a technocratic physical approach<br />

that worked efficiently while the NCDC’s major<br />

brief was the production of a standardized urban<br />

environment. The key strategic document was<br />

Tomorrow’s Canberra (1970), whose analytical<br />

rationale came from a major land use and transportation<br />

study undertaken by American consultants<br />

Alan Vorhees and Associates. The desired<br />

urban structure of metropolitan Canberra was a<br />

Y-plan articulated as a series of discrete communities<br />

of 50,000 to 100,000 residents with nodal<br />

town centers and linked by an internal public<br />

transportation spine and peripheral freeways. This<br />

schema laid the blueprint for the new suburban<br />

towns of Woden, Belconnen, Tuggeranong, and<br />

Gungahlin and remains evident today.<br />

Since the 1960s, landmark elements in the<br />

planned landscape came to fruition, from major<br />

national buildings such as the National Library,<br />

the High Court, and the National (Art) Gallery, to<br />

a metropolitan hierarchy of commercial retail<br />

nodes to the damming of the Molonglo River to<br />

create the centerpiece, Lake Burley Griffin. The<br />

high point was the new Parliament House designed<br />

by Mitchell, Giurgola, and Thorp and opened to<br />

celebrate the Australian bicentennial of European<br />

settlement in 1988.<br />

By then winds of change were evident. The<br />

NCDC’s corporate planning approach was seen at<br />

odds with moves toward greater community participation,<br />

with a Legislative Assembly already having<br />

been established in 1974. Pursuing an economically<br />

rationalist ideology, the federal government was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!