13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Other things being equal, each firm has an incentive<br />

to establish itself close to the others, thus<br />

fostering the agglomeration of firms. The centrifugal<br />

force is less straightforward and involves<br />

land and labor markets. The clustering of many<br />

firms in a single area increases the average commuting<br />

distance for workers, which in turn<br />

increases the wage rate and land rent in the area<br />

surrounding the cluster. Such high wages and land<br />

rents discourage further agglomeration of firms in<br />

the same area. The equilibrium distributions of<br />

firms and households are thus a balance between<br />

these opposite forces. In two seminal papers published<br />

in the early 1980s, Fujita identified the<br />

conditions to be imposed on communication fields<br />

and commuting costs for a monocentric, polycentric,<br />

or integrated urban pattern to emerge as the<br />

market outcome.<br />

The dominant view through about 1990 was<br />

that agglomeration was a condition produced by<br />

spatial externalities of various types, including<br />

knowledge spillovers, matching externalities in<br />

labor markets, and the provision of local public<br />

goods. The more recent approach, with roots in<br />

general equilibrium models of monopolistic competition,<br />

focuses on demand side advantages arising<br />

from clustering when agents have a preference<br />

for variety and local competition is limited by<br />

product differentiation. In 1988, Fujita developed<br />

the monopolistic competition foundations of the<br />

economics of agglomeration, which makes him<br />

one of the founders of the new economic geography.<br />

In The Spatial Economy, coauthored with<br />

Fujita, Masahisa<br />

283<br />

Paul Krugman and Anthony Venables, Fujita provided<br />

a synthetic application of nonlinear dynamics<br />

to regional economics and international trade,<br />

as well as to urban economics. This book is a<br />

landmark in spatial economics and has established<br />

new economic geography as an economic<br />

field proper.<br />

See also Journey to Work; Urban Economics<br />

Further Readings<br />

Jacques Thisse<br />

Fujita, M. 1989. Urban Economic Theory. Land Use and<br />

City Size. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.<br />

———. 1988. “A Monopolistic Competition Model of<br />

Spatial Agglomeration: A Differentiated Product<br />

Approach.” Regional Science and Urban Economics<br />

18:87–124.<br />

Fujita, Masahisa and Tomava Mori. 1996. “The Role of<br />

Ports in the Making of Major Cities: Selfagglomeration<br />

and Hub-effect. Journal of<br />

Development Economics 49(1):93–120.<br />

Fujita M., P. Krugman, and A. J. Venables. 1999. The<br />

Spatial Economy. Cities, Regions, and International<br />

Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.<br />

Ottaviano, Gianmarco I. P. and Diego Puga. 1998.<br />

“Agglomeration in the Global Economy: A Survey of<br />

the `New Economic Geography.’” World Economy<br />

21:707–31.<br />

Parr, John B. 2002. “Agglomeration Economies:<br />

Ambiguities and Confusions.” Environment and<br />

Planning A 34:717–31.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!