13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

cooperation between various private or public and<br />

private organizations, although today, the majority<br />

of the subway systems are not profitable and have to<br />

be subsidized, and most systems are owned and<br />

operated by public institutions. Because of the<br />

amount of labor required to construct and then<br />

operate subway systems, public transportation<br />

authorities are often some of the largest employers in<br />

<strong>cities</strong> and organized worker unions have historically<br />

been very influential in city politics.<br />

The use of electrical motors in rail traffic first<br />

appeared in London in 1890 and allowed for the<br />

development of systems in other European <strong>cities</strong><br />

like Paris (1900) and Berlin (1902), U.S. <strong>cities</strong> like<br />

Boston (1897) and New York (1904), and later to<br />

Buenos Aires (1913), Toyko (1927), and Osaka<br />

(1933), the only subways outside of Europe and<br />

North America until 1957.<br />

After World War II, with the increasing popularity<br />

of automobile traffic, most subway systems<br />

stagnated or declined, some even dismantled tram<br />

lines to make place for cars. In the succeeding<br />

years, new technological developments like rubber<br />

tires and a returned interest in public<br />

transportation in urban planning have resulted in<br />

an exponential increase in subways implemented<br />

worldwide, with more than 160 systems in operation<br />

in the first decade of the twenty-first century.<br />

The correlation between the development of<br />

subway systems and the prevalence of Fordist<br />

modes of capitalist production points to the<br />

importance of subways in national and global<br />

economies. In the past few decades, the majority of<br />

new subway systems have emerged in the Asian<br />

and South American <strong>cities</strong> where industrial and<br />

service economies have been growing. Even in socalled<br />

developed post-Fordist <strong>cities</strong>, such as those<br />

in Europe and the United States, the subway exists<br />

as a reminder of the always present articulation of<br />

late capitalist modes of production with their predecessors.<br />

Subways, predominantly used by the<br />

lower and middle classes especially in most major<br />

North American <strong>cities</strong>, depend greatly on Fordist<br />

infrastructures—organizing and regulating mass<br />

flows and movement and making the subway.<br />

Cultural and Social Significance<br />

In the context of the multiple histories of subway<br />

authorities and diverse <strong>cities</strong>, the idea of the subway,<br />

Subway<br />

785<br />

as a semiotic signifier, is just as meaningful to<br />

everyday urban life as the material systems that the<br />

term is used to identify. The subway has become<br />

an attribute of the imaginary of metropolitan<br />

areas, entering collective imaginations and discourses.<br />

It found its way into culture through<br />

music, films, literature, and art, which turned the<br />

subway into an icon of modern urbanity. Notable<br />

examples include Ezra Pound’s 1913 poem “In a<br />

Station of the Metro,” the Duke Ellington<br />

Orchestra’s signature 1939 song “Take the A<br />

Train,” the 1974 Joseph Sargent film The Taking<br />

of Pelham One Two Three, and the 2003 film<br />

Café Lumière directed by Hou Hsiao-Hsen.<br />

The noisiness of the city, its streets crowded<br />

with carts, pedestrians, and trolley cars quickly<br />

relaxed as traffic was displaced underground. The<br />

city became quieter and cleaner, on its surface.<br />

Subways not only change the fabric of the city<br />

and modify practices and social interactions of its<br />

dwellers, they also alter the experience and perception<br />

of the city via processes of deterritorialization<br />

and fragmentation, especially when moving<br />

underground.<br />

Unlike other forms of urban transportation, the<br />

subway places passengers in the dark, submerged<br />

underground where visual navigation reliant on<br />

orientation toward familiar landmarks is suspended.<br />

Passengers sit in stasis, paradoxically<br />

immobile while moving quickly under the city. The<br />

city is deterritorialized, and destination points are<br />

fragmented in space, sprouting from the subway<br />

like rhizomes throughout the city. Passengers must<br />

learn to rely on other symbols of navigation, such<br />

as subway maps, as well as their other senses,<br />

whether they wish to avoid unpleasantly odorous<br />

fellow passengers or attend to service changes as<br />

announced over public address systems.<br />

Subway passengers share an experience of<br />

crowds, a high physical density and nearness of<br />

strangers, anonymity and being exposed in a close<br />

space, all attributes that have become representative<br />

not just of the subway but of <strong>cities</strong> in general.<br />

These experiences yield practices of isolation, like<br />

reading the newspaper or listening to headphones,<br />

which provide barriers to potentially unwanted<br />

social interactions. Passengers often use personal<br />

multimedia devices and books to regulate their<br />

personal space, injecting the private sphere into the<br />

public, a manifestation of Raymond Williams’s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!