13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

424 Kracauer, Siegfried<br />

operettas and musical comedies, Kracauer’s study<br />

provides a panoramic and critical representation<br />

of the prevailing cityscape from which these frivolous<br />

works drew their inspiration and in which<br />

they found acclaim: boulevards peopled by bohemians<br />

and journalists; the world exhibitions; the<br />

salons of fashionable society; the courtesans and the<br />

demi-monde; and the court of Napoleon III, with its<br />

imperial pomp and ceremony. Contemporaneous<br />

with Benjamin’s planned but unwritten Arcades<br />

Project, Kracauer similarly sought to disenchant<br />

Paris, capital of the nineteenth century, as a locus<br />

of phantasmagoria, dreams, and chimeras. As<br />

itself an absurd “operetta world,” the Second<br />

Empire found perfect expression in, and was subject<br />

to critical debunking by, Offenbach’s seemingly<br />

innocent musical enchantments. Laced<br />

with unmistakable references to the brutality of<br />

dictatorships and their phony spell of “joy and<br />

glamour,” Kracauer’s study constitutes an exemplary<br />

reading of the metropolitan life of the<br />

recent past through one of its “surface,” cultural<br />

phenomena.<br />

Writing a Theory of Film<br />

Kracauer escaped German-occupied France in<br />

1941 and spent the rest of his life in New York<br />

City. There he wrote and published the two major<br />

(and much misunderstood and maligned) studies<br />

of film and cinema for which he is best known in<br />

Anglo-American scholarship: From Caligari to<br />

Hitler: A Psychological History of the German<br />

Film (1947) and Theory of Film: The Redemption<br />

of Physical Reality (1960). These are of particular<br />

relevance for urban studies for two reasons. First,<br />

as part of his “psychological history” of Weimar<br />

films as reflections or premonitions of deepseated<br />

authoritarian predispositions and inclinations,<br />

Kracauer discusses in some detail the<br />

“street film” as a particular and popular genre<br />

during the 1920s. These films, typically portraying<br />

the doomed romantic rebellion of youth<br />

against the restrictions and cozy comforts of the<br />

bourgeois familial home, presented apparently<br />

contrasting messages. Films like Die Strasse (1923)<br />

served as warnings to the unwary as to the dangers<br />

of the metropolitan street as a site of vice, corruption,<br />

and brutality, whereas later variations on the<br />

theme, like Die Freudlose Gasse (1925) and Asphalt<br />

(1929), sentimentally contrasted the impoverished<br />

integrity of a lowly but genuine life among social<br />

outcasts with the arrant hypocrisy and crass conventions<br />

of middle-class domesticity. The city as<br />

threatening chaos; the city as romantic escape—<br />

for Kracauer both of these clichéd images played<br />

their part in preparing the German public for<br />

what was to come.<br />

Most significantly in the Caligari book,<br />

Kracauer begins to identify and sketch some key<br />

correspondences between the cinematic medium<br />

itself and the urban environment. These find much<br />

fuller development in, indeed become central to,<br />

his subsequent attempt to delineate a more general<br />

theory of film per se. For Kracauer, film has a<br />

special elective affinity with the city. The movie<br />

camera finds its most appropriate subject matter<br />

in the perpetual mobility, fluidity, transience, and<br />

happenstance of metropolitan existence. Film has<br />

a particular penchant for the “flow of life” on the<br />

urban street. Put another way: The city is itself<br />

cinematic. Indeed, Kracauer argues, in its ability<br />

to penetrate and record with unprecedented felicity<br />

everyday street life, film promises to reawaken<br />

our jaded senses to that which surrounds us. Film<br />

captures and focuses our attention on what is usually<br />

perceived in a state of weary distraction and<br />

indifference. In so doing, film images facilitate a<br />

new recognition and vital appreciation of our<br />

everyday environment. Redeemed by film, the city<br />

is restored to us. Film thereby becomes, for<br />

Kracauer, the very medium by means of which<br />

modern urbanites can overcome the rationalized<br />

and routinized existence of the big city. Film offers<br />

a home for the spiritually homeless.<br />

Kracauer’s varied writings on the theme of the<br />

city offer a kaleidoscopic, critical, and ultimately<br />

redemptive vision of the modern metropolis and<br />

popular urban culture.<br />

Graeme Gilloch<br />

See also Benjamin, Walter; Cinematic Urbanism; Flâneur;<br />

Paris, France; Simmel, Georg<br />

Further Readings<br />

Frisby, David. 1988. Fragments of Modernity: Theories<br />

of Modernity in the Work of Simmel, Kracauer and<br />

Benjamin. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!