13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

464 Los Angeles, California<br />

likely that London will retain its global city status,<br />

it is possible that the dominance of banking and<br />

finance may prove to be London’s Achilles heel, at<br />

least in the short term; this could result in a major<br />

economic downturn with consequent impacts on<br />

people’s lives. What the implications are for Sassen’s<br />

polarization thesis remains to be seen.<br />

While the impact of the financial crisis and<br />

recession will increase unemployment, it is unclear<br />

whether this will affect the highly skilled and<br />

high-paid groups more than the low-skilled groups.<br />

If it does, it could lead to a slowing or reversal of<br />

the growth of the middle classes and of immigration.<br />

What is very likely is that job losses and<br />

income cutbacks in the high-income sectors of<br />

banking and law will reduce earnings and income<br />

inequalities and increase housing affordability, at<br />

least in the short to medium term. Only time will<br />

tell whether London and New York will recover<br />

their global position or whether there will be a<br />

permanent shift in economic and financial power<br />

toward Southeast Asia.<br />

Chris Hamnett<br />

See also Gentrification; Globalization; Housing; Social<br />

Housing; World City<br />

Further Readings<br />

Atkinson, R. 2000. “Measuring Gentrification and<br />

Displacement in Greater London.” Urban Studies<br />

37(1):149–66.<br />

Beaverstock, J. V., R. G. Smith, and P. J. Taylor. 1996.<br />

“The Global Capacity of a World City: A Relational<br />

Study of London.” In Globalisation Theory and<br />

Practice, edited by E. Kofman and G. Youngs.<br />

London: Cassell.<br />

Buck, N., I. Gordon, P. Hall, M. Harloe, and M.<br />

Kleinmann. 2002. Working Capital: Life and Labour<br />

in Contemporary London. London, Routledge.<br />

Butler, T., C. Hamnett, and M. Ramsden. 2008. “Inward<br />

and Upward: Marking Out Social Class Change in<br />

London, 1981–2001.” Urban Studies 45(1):67–88.<br />

Davidson, M. and L. Lees. 2005. “New-Build<br />

‘Gentrification’ and London’s Riverside Renaissance.”<br />

Environment and Planning A 37:1165–90.<br />

Girouard, Mark. 1985. Cities and People: A Social and<br />

Architectural History. New Haven, CT: Yale<br />

University Press.<br />

Greater London Authority. 2002. Creativity: London’s<br />

Core Business. London: Author.<br />

———. 2008. London: A Cultural Audit. London:<br />

Author.<br />

Hall, P. 2007. London Voices, London Lives: Tales from<br />

a Working Capital. London: Routledge.<br />

Hamnett, C. 2003. “Gentrification and the Middle-Class<br />

Remaking of Inner London, 1961–2001.” Urban<br />

Studies 40(12):2401–26.<br />

———. 2003. Unequal City: London in the Global<br />

Arena. London: Routledge.<br />

Hamnett, C. and D. Whitelegg. 2007. “Loft Conversion<br />

and Gentrification in London: From Industrial to<br />

Post-industrial Land Use.” Environment and Planning<br />

A 39(1):106–24.<br />

Hebbert, M. 1998. London: More by Fortune Than<br />

Design. London: Wiley.<br />

Newman, P. and I. Smith. 2000. “Cultural Production,<br />

Place, and Politics on the South Bank of the Thames.”<br />

International Journal of Urban and Regional<br />

Research 24(1):9–24.<br />

Sassen, S. 2001. The Global City: New York, London,<br />

and Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.<br />

Thrift, N. 1994. “On the Social and Cultural<br />

Determinants of International Financial Centres: The<br />

Case of the City of London.” In Money, Power, and<br />

Space, edited by S. Corbridge, N. Thrift, and R.<br />

Martin. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.<br />

Lo s aN g e L e s, ca L i f o r N i a<br />

In the field of urban studies, Los Angeles is a key<br />

reference case for the analysis of contemporary<br />

urban restructuring. The followers of the Los<br />

Angeles School of Urban Studies ascribe to Los<br />

Angeles a paradigmatic status among postmodern<br />

urban regions. Los Angeles exemplifies a new model<br />

of urbanism, which, in contrast to the teachings of<br />

the Chicago School of Urbanism of the 1920s, is<br />

no longer organized around a central urban core<br />

or a central business district (CBD). Instead, its<br />

polycentric settlement pattern is best characterized<br />

as “dense sprawl.” Less than 1 of 10 jobs and<br />

even fewer of the housing units in the region are<br />

located downtown. But even without an equivalent<br />

to midtown or downtown Manhattan, at<br />

6,000 inhabitants per square mile, the Los Angeles<br />

urban area is the densest metropolitan region in<br />

the United States.<br />

The greater Los Angeles area, also called “the<br />

Southland,” extends over 400 square miles. Los

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!