13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

790 Sustainable Development<br />

implications for social relations and neighborhood<br />

formation and for the embedding of social exclusion<br />

in the fabric of the city.<br />

Certainly, in a period dominated by risk and<br />

risk management, everything in the city has a tendency<br />

to be sorted by profitability and threat. This<br />

means a constant shifting between various strategies<br />

associated with urban order: the discipline of<br />

surveillance with its apparatus of visibility, the<br />

moral order of the government of conduct and its<br />

focus on welfare and responsibility, and the authoritarianism<br />

of sovereign power with its violence and<br />

territorial control. Contemporary urban surveillance<br />

is also complicated by contestation over the<br />

cultural meanings of surveillance.<br />

Surveillance should be understood not only as<br />

control by a small number of watchers and a<br />

mass of watched, but as a complex and contradictory<br />

process of social ordering, involving processes<br />

such as synopticism (the many watching<br />

the few), mutual surveillance, and the pleasures<br />

and performative aspects of watching and being<br />

watched. The body retains a central place whether<br />

it is in DNA testing, in police stop-and-search<br />

procedures, or as an instrument of surveillance<br />

itself. There is a dual process of where we are<br />

asked to be alert and watch others, but acts of<br />

potential surveillance, such as photography in<br />

public places are also regarded with suspicion by<br />

urban authorities.<br />

It is also the case that a surveillance society is<br />

not a society of total control and, as such, may<br />

perhaps be defined not by any totalizing model,<br />

whether based on the panopticon or any other<br />

exemplary mechanism, or even an amorphous surveillant<br />

assemblage, but as an oligopticon, an<br />

urban environment defined by multiple limited<br />

forms of control and surveillance, riven with visible<br />

and invisible, variously permeable borders,<br />

gaps, and blind spots. These are not simply a question<br />

of location: For some, especially “others,” like<br />

asylum seekers, borders are never really crossed<br />

but remain with them like a stretched elastic that<br />

threatens to rebound and expel them at any<br />

moment.<br />

David Murakami Wood<br />

See also Bunkers; Crime; Davis, Mike; Divided Cities;<br />

Landscapes of Power<br />

Further Readings<br />

Coaffee, Jon, David Murakami Wood, and Peter Rogers.<br />

2009. The Everyday Resilience of the City: How<br />

Cities Respond to Terrorism and Disaster.<br />

Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.<br />

Coleman, Roy. 2004. Reclaiming the Streets: Surveillance,<br />

Social Control and the City. Cullhompton, UK:<br />

Willan.<br />

Galloway, Alexander. 2004. Protocol: How Control<br />

Exists after Decentralization. Cambridge: MIT Press.<br />

Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin. 2001. Splintering<br />

Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological<br />

Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London:<br />

Routledge.<br />

Lyon, David. 2007. Surveillance Studies: An Overview.<br />

Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.<br />

Murakami Wood, D., ed., with K. Ball, S. Graham, D.<br />

Lyon, C. Norris, and C. Raab. 2006. A Report on the<br />

Surveillance Society. Wilmslow, UK: Office of the<br />

Information Commissioner.<br />

Su S t a i n a B l e de v e l o p M e n t<br />

Sustainable development has achieved widespread<br />

political acceptance over the course of several<br />

decades thanks largely to a series of international<br />

environmental and urban policy conferences,<br />

starting with the UN Conference on the Human<br />

Environment in 1972, through to the World<br />

(Brundtland) Commission on the Environment<br />

and Development in 1987; Rio de Janeiro’s UN<br />

Conference on Environment and Development in<br />

1992, which established AGENDA 21 with its<br />

emphasis on sustainable land use management<br />

and the need for local decision making; and the<br />

Johannesburg Summit in 2002. Unfortunately,<br />

while Rio’s AGENDA 21 has been put into practice<br />

in more than 6,000 communities, this has<br />

been more the case in developing nations, rather<br />

than in the <strong>cities</strong> of the industrialized West.<br />

Sustainable development is most often conceived—consistent<br />

with the Brundtland Commission<br />

report Our Common Future—as forms of development<br />

“that [meet] the needs of the present without<br />

compromising the ability of future generations to<br />

meet their own needs.” Sustainable development<br />

should achieve a more equitable balance between<br />

human needs and those of nature, such that local

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!