13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

866 Urban Economics<br />

density of the surrounding region. This definition<br />

accommodates urban areas of vastly different sizes,<br />

from a small town to a large metropolitan area. It<br />

assumes population density to be an essential feature<br />

of an urban economy because it generates<br />

frequent contact between different economic activities,<br />

something that is feasible only if firms and<br />

households are spatially concentrated.<br />

Location Decisions and the<br />

Development of Cities<br />

A fundamental question of urban economics is<br />

why <strong>cities</strong> exist. Why do people tolerate the obvious<br />

negative consequences—congestion, pollution,<br />

noise, and crime—of living in <strong>cities</strong>? The answer is<br />

that <strong>cities</strong> exist because labor specialization and<br />

centralized production make people more prosperous.<br />

Cities offer a higher standard of living, and<br />

roughly three-fourths of people in developed countries<br />

choose to live in urban areas. Worldwide,<br />

about one-half of the population lives in <strong>cities</strong>, and<br />

the urban share is increasing. Urban economists<br />

have identified three conditions necessary for the<br />

development of <strong>cities</strong>: (1) agricultural surplus—<br />

people outside <strong>cities</strong> must produce enough food to<br />

feed themselves and city dwellers; (2) urban<br />

production—city dwellers must produce goods or<br />

services to exchange for food grown by rural workers;<br />

and (3) transportation for exchange—there<br />

must be an efficient transportation system to facilitate<br />

the exchange of food and urban products.<br />

At the heart of urban production is the notion<br />

that centralized production is efficient for some<br />

products but not others. If there are economies of<br />

scale in production or in exchange (if unit cost<br />

decreases as the quantity produced increases),<br />

large-scale production is more efficient, and a city<br />

develops because workers live near production<br />

facilities. The resulting competition for land bids<br />

up its price, causing an increase in population density<br />

and thus producing a city.<br />

Large <strong>cities</strong> develop when firms find it advantageous<br />

to locate close to one another rather than<br />

spreading out and carving out individual market<br />

areas. In some cases, agglomeration occurs as<br />

firms cluster around a source of raw materials or<br />

near a transportation node such as a natural harbor.<br />

In other cases, firms benefit from locating<br />

close to other firms, including their competitors in<br />

input and output markets. For example, firms producing<br />

the same output (e.g., high-fashion dresses)<br />

share a supplier of an intermediate good (e.g., buttons)<br />

and locate close to one another to access the<br />

supplier efficiently. Similarly, firms cluster to utilize<br />

a common labor pool. In a modern economy with<br />

its rapid technological change, clustering allows<br />

firms to benefit from knowledge spillovers, that is,<br />

from ideas and technological innovation that flow<br />

from one firm to another.<br />

Urban Spatial Structure<br />

Urban economics explores the intraurban location<br />

decisions of firms, workers, and households. Their<br />

location choices cause variation in the demand for<br />

land within a metropolitan area, thereby causing<br />

spatial variation in the prices of land, housing, and<br />

commercial space. This variation leads land users<br />

to economize on expensive land, resulting in a spatial<br />

variation in the density of population and<br />

employment. Urban economists estimate density<br />

functions and track them over time. Across the past<br />

century, economic activity within <strong>cities</strong> has become<br />

less centralized.<br />

In modern metropolitan areas, jobs are divided<br />

between central business districts, suburban subcenters,<br />

and “everywhere else.” It turns out that<br />

most jobs are elsewhere—widely dispersed throughout<br />

the metropolitan area—and most people work<br />

and live far from the center. In the heyday of the<br />

monocentric city about 100 years ago, between<br />

two-thirds and three-fourths of jobs were near the<br />

center. Among the reasons for the dramatic transformation<br />

of the spatial structure of <strong>cities</strong> was the<br />

development of the truck, which replaced the horsedrawn<br />

wagon for intracity freight and replaced<br />

ships and trains for intercity freight. Other reasons<br />

include the automobile as an alternative to streetcars,<br />

the switch from multistory to single-story factory<br />

production, and innovations in telecommunication<br />

that allowed information-processing activities to<br />

move away from the central core area.<br />

When a household chooses a house or apartment,<br />

it chooses much more than a dwelling. It<br />

also chooses a set of local public goods (e.g.,<br />

schools, parks, and public safety), taxes to<br />

finance the public goods, and neighbors who<br />

provide opportunities for social interactions and<br />

schoolmates for their children. Urban economics

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!