13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kusmer, K. 2002. “Down and Out.” In On the Road:<br />

Homelessness in American History. New York:<br />

Oxford University Press.<br />

National Coalition for the Homeless & National Law<br />

Center on Homelessness and Poverty. 2006. A Dream<br />

Denied: The Criminalization of Homelessness in U S.<br />

Cities. Washington, DC: Authors.<br />

Rossi, Peter. 1991. Down and out in America: The<br />

Origins of Homelessness. Chicago: University of<br />

Chicago Press.<br />

Snow, David A. and Leon Anderson. 1993. Down on<br />

Their Luck: A Study of Homeless Street People.<br />

Berkeley: University of California Press.<br />

Wagner, D. 1993. Checkerboard Square: Culture and<br />

Resistance in a Homeless Community. Boulder, CO:<br />

Westview Press.<br />

Wright, Talmadge. 1998. Out of Place: Homeless<br />

Mobilizations, Sub<strong>cities</strong>, and Contested Landscapes.<br />

Albany: State University of New York Press.<br />

Ho m e o w n e r s as s o C i a t i o n s<br />

Homeowners association (HOA) is a specific term<br />

used in the United States and some other countries<br />

for incorporated associations of homeowners who<br />

have formed an organization to govern common<br />

property. Common property might include shared<br />

parts of buildings, parking lots, streets, recreational<br />

facilities, and, in larger developments, schools and<br />

private town halls. Homeowners associations collect<br />

monthly fees from homeowners (assessments)<br />

and organize a contractual version of local government,<br />

delivering services and enforcing private<br />

land use restrictions. Decisions are made by an<br />

elected executive board and are governed by an<br />

annual homeowners’ meeting. The board employs<br />

a property management company to execute its<br />

day-to-day estate management responsibilities.<br />

Homeowners associations are set up variously<br />

as companies, trusts, and other entities, depending<br />

on the legal instruments a country has at its<br />

disposal. In the United States, homeowners associations<br />

govern landed properties, usually in master<br />

planned developments, and are distinguished<br />

from condominium associations, which govern<br />

shared property in apartment developments.<br />

Community association is the more general term<br />

used to describe private organizations that govern<br />

neighborhoods and may include condominium<br />

Homeowners Associations<br />

365<br />

associations, homeowners associations, cooperatives,<br />

and their variants.<br />

The idea of a legal entity governing shared private<br />

territory has a long history. In France, the first<br />

modern joint-ownership (condominium) law was<br />

created in 1804. For 200 years, every new land<br />

subdivision in France has been required to establish<br />

restrictive covenants and, in the case of private<br />

streets, a homeowners association. Condominium<br />

law was exported from France to the United States<br />

in the 1960s; subsequently, there was a veritable<br />

explosion of private local governments. In 1964,<br />

the United States had 500 community associations.<br />

This grew to 274,000 by 2005, providing housing<br />

for 54.6 million Americans (18.5 percent of the<br />

population). The economist Robert Nelson views<br />

the rise of homeowners and condominium associations<br />

as the greatest innovation in ownership since<br />

the birth of the modern joint stock company in the<br />

late nineteenth century. He argues that it redistributes<br />

ownership of urban infrastructure stock from<br />

the few to the many, decentralizes control, and<br />

radically changes the incentive structure and the<br />

politics of investment and stock management.<br />

Not surprisingly, a great many controversies<br />

are associated with the phenomenon. Privately<br />

governed neighborhoods are alleged to reduce<br />

political participation and change voting behavior.<br />

They are said to exacerbate social–spatial<br />

segregation, fuel the fear of others, displace crime<br />

and traffic problems, and pose a long-term risk to<br />

social cohesion. On the other hand, they clearly<br />

offer something of value to homeowners, including<br />

reduced investment risk, a greater sense of<br />

community, a better quality of local services, and<br />

more clearly packaged neighborhood choice. The<br />

balance between costs and benefits is an empirical<br />

matter and currently subject to much scrutiny.<br />

As important as the alleged social and systemic<br />

costs are the private costs of contractual government<br />

(the legal costs of setting up a well-founded<br />

administration and the cost of settling disputes).<br />

There is a growing body of research on the coevolution<br />

of private and public urban governance and<br />

a variety of institutional models are emerging in<br />

different economic and cultural contexts.<br />

Chris Webster<br />

See also Common Interest Development; Condominium;<br />

Governance; Housing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!