13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

898 Urban Morphology<br />

connected urban form and landscape to economic<br />

restructuring via globalization, to postmodern<br />

architecture, and to qualitative techniques that<br />

interpret urban space. Whitehand suggests that<br />

within geography alone, three distinct types of<br />

advances in urban morphological research have<br />

been apparent: (1) the computer-aided analysis<br />

and representation of urban physical form,<br />

(2) urban morphogenetics, and (3) the exploration<br />

of the social significance of urban landscapes.<br />

The first research advance is quite prominent in<br />

geoinformatics and the use of global information<br />

system (GIS) tools in geography. Although geoinformatic<br />

methods are used more often to analyze<br />

physical features of the environment, the spatial<br />

data and the GIS-based modeling expand the possibilities<br />

for quantitatively analyzing the urban<br />

form and the landscape of the built-up urban<br />

environment.<br />

In light of the dynamics of urban geography<br />

during the past decades, which includes successive<br />

approaches from positivist to structuralist<br />

and humanistic, it is necessary to reevaluate the<br />

philosophical and methodological bases of contemporary<br />

urban morphology. The most prominent<br />

and longest-established research themes<br />

concern the transformation of city form and<br />

urban spaces and the development and management<br />

of urban landscapes. Today urban morphological<br />

studies are more interested than before in<br />

the agents of change. Current research is probing<br />

the influence of land and property owners, architects,<br />

developers, and individual residents on<br />

urban landscape. Studies of a variety of individuals<br />

and organizations involved in land-use development<br />

are similar to the institutional approach<br />

where urban form is a result of interests of different<br />

agents and of division of power in local conflicts.<br />

Those researchers who have focused<br />

attention on the agents of change see conflicts<br />

endemic to the processes of development, particularly<br />

those occuring within existing urban areas.<br />

In this context, future urban morphological analyses<br />

should aim to understand the values and ideologies<br />

of different kinds of institutions (agents),<br />

and the decision-making processes of these institutions,<br />

concerning urban space and life.<br />

Dealing with the concept of the urban landscape,<br />

urban morphology is closely related to those<br />

research practices that, in many sciences, have<br />

adopted qualitative methodologies to understand<br />

the social meaning of urban landscapes and to<br />

interpret symbolic qualities of urban space. Utilizing<br />

linguistic and semiological methods any city can be<br />

read as texts, a narrative of signs and symbols. Such<br />

interpretations are different from the idea of landscape<br />

as a mathematical or statistical construct.<br />

Instead the focus of interest has often been the<br />

ideological basis or power relations (cf. landscapes<br />

of power) of creations in the landscape. Consequently,<br />

architecture and urban design, key elements of the<br />

visible townscape, have developed significant relationships<br />

with urban political economy and with<br />

producers, consumers, and exchangers of urban<br />

space.<br />

Urban morphology has a long history of models,<br />

concepts, and approaches created to understand<br />

the development of urban form and urban<br />

landscape. Moreover, it has maintained some of its<br />

main themes of research for a century and processed<br />

those themes according to the current needs<br />

of research. At the same time, urban morphological<br />

studies have engaged in practices in other urban<br />

disciplines and continue to pursue an elusive leading<br />

paradigm for morphological urban analysis.<br />

Harri Andersson<br />

See also Land Development; Social Production of Space;<br />

Urban Agglomeration; Urban Design; Urban<br />

Geography; Urban Planning<br />

Further Readings<br />

Knox, Paul. 2006. Urban Social Geography. An<br />

Introduction. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice<br />

Hall.<br />

Larkham, Peter J. 1998. “Urban Morphology and<br />

Typology in the United Kingdom.” Pp. 159–77 in<br />

Typological Process and Design Theory, edited by<br />

A. Petruccioli. Cambridge, MA: Aga Khan Program<br />

for Islamic Architecture.<br />

Vance, James E., Jr. 1990. The Continuing City. Urban<br />

Morphology in Western Civilization. Baltimore: Johns<br />

Hopkins University Press.<br />

Whitehand, J. W. R. 1987. “Urban Morphology.”<br />

Pp. 250–76 in Historical Geography: Progress and<br />

Prospect, edited by M. Pacione. London: Croom<br />

Helm.<br />

———. 1994. “Development Cycles and Urban<br />

Landscapes.” Geography 79(1):3–17.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!