13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

246 Environmental Justice<br />

justice, as when a jobs-starved community agreed<br />

to a chemical plant in its midst.<br />

Reconceptualizations<br />

Growing awareness of the limited scope for case-bycase<br />

solutions, combined with theoretical advancements<br />

in the broader social sciences, prompted a<br />

reconsideration of the conceptual and theoretical<br />

underpinnings of environmental justice. Expanded<br />

conceptualizations of justice, rights, environment,<br />

and race have redirected the scope and approach of<br />

environmental justice from a legal strategy based on<br />

individual rights to a social and political movement<br />

seeking broad structural change.<br />

Recognition of the limitations inherent in focusing<br />

exclusively on the spatial patterns of environmental<br />

burdens increasingly directed attention<br />

from distributional outcomes to causal processes<br />

and from distributive to procedural justice. Within<br />

a procedural justice approach, claims asserting a<br />

right of communities of color to participate in distributional<br />

decisions quickly gave way to more<br />

vigorous demands for participation in decisions<br />

affecting the production of environmental burdens<br />

to be distributed and for pollution reduction rather<br />

than mere redistribution.<br />

Procedural justice demands in turn focused<br />

attention on the constraining effects on participation<br />

of entrenched social and economic inequality,<br />

prompting a debate between structuralists calling<br />

for the elimination of class, income, and racial<br />

disparities as a necessary precondition for equal<br />

participation, and proceduralists urging participation,<br />

however initially imperfect, as a means for<br />

exposing and thus challenging structural inequity.<br />

Political theorists pointed to an underlying shift<br />

within the environmental justice debate from a<br />

Rawlsian liberal framework of individual rights<br />

granted by the state to a structural understanding<br />

of the social and political construction of nature<br />

and the environment.<br />

In practical terms, these reconceptualizations<br />

shifted attention from seeking distributional<br />

equity in the siting and location of individual<br />

noxious facilities to pursuing environmental justice<br />

in the large-scale structural processes through<br />

which both people and environments are distributed<br />

across the geographic landscape. A parallel<br />

conceptual expansion broadened the theorization<br />

of race in the attainment of environmental justice<br />

from a concern with individual racist acts to a<br />

focus on institutional and systemic racism pervasive<br />

throughout society. In place of the traditional<br />

understanding of race as a characteristic of individuals<br />

differentiating people into preexisting categories,<br />

environmental justice theorists advanced<br />

the concept of White privilege as a diffuse social<br />

practice that works through racial categories such<br />

that privilege—including, in this case, access to<br />

privileged environments—is differentially distributed.<br />

The shift from individual noxious facilities<br />

to the structural production of large-scale<br />

environments, from individual rights to social<br />

justice, and from the racial categorization of individuals<br />

to systemic racist practices all cohere in a<br />

conceptualization of environmental justice as a<br />

responsibility shared not only by individuals held<br />

liable for transgressing principles of equity but<br />

by all those who benefit from membership in<br />

a political community. Environmental justice, on<br />

this account, is a responsibility of all.<br />

Robert W. Lake<br />

See also Environmental Policy; Landscapes of Power;<br />

Racialization; Social Production of Space<br />

Further Readings<br />

Bullard, Robert D. 1990. Dumping in Dixie: Race,<br />

Class, and Environmental Quality. Boulder, CO:<br />

Westview Press.<br />

Dukic, Mustafa. 2001. “Justice and the Spatial<br />

Imagination.” Environment and Planning-A 33:<br />

1785–1805.<br />

Kurtz, Hilda E. 2003. “Scale Frames and Counter-Scale<br />

Frames: Constructing the Problem of Environmental<br />

Injustice.” Political Geography 22:887–916.<br />

Lake, Robert W. 1996. “Volunteers, NIMBYs, and<br />

Environmental Justice: Dilemmas of Democratic<br />

Practice.” Antipode 28:160–74.<br />

Pulido, Laura. 2000. “Rethinking Environmental Racism:<br />

White Privilege and Urban Development in Southern<br />

California.” Annals of the Association of American<br />

Geographers 90:12–40.<br />

Swyngedouw, Erik and Nikolas C. Heynen. 2003.<br />

“Urban Political Ecology, Justice and the Politics of<br />

Scale.” Antipode 35:898–918.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!