13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ot h e r Gl O b a l Cities<br />

The concept of the global city typically refers to<br />

those <strong>cities</strong> that function as command and control<br />

sites in coordinating transnational finance, production,<br />

and information processes integral to the<br />

global economy. As an object of analysis, the<br />

global city highlights the importance of spatial<br />

analysis and the local for the study of globalization<br />

and destabilizes the primacy given to the<br />

nation-state’s role in governance over global processes.<br />

Yet, this paradigm has been criticized for<br />

its overly economic and reductive approach to the<br />

study of <strong>cities</strong> and the urban and its tendency to<br />

generalize the global city as an urban form based<br />

on advanced capitalist <strong>cities</strong> in the North. As a<br />

result, alternative theorizing about the global city<br />

is emerging based on “other <strong>cities</strong>” of the South<br />

and alternative urban forms, often spaces of<br />

exclusion and poverty, such as the camp and the<br />

slum. This alternative approach represents a significant<br />

contribution to the study of urban and<br />

global politics. First, it raises questions about<br />

whose knowledge and experiences of the city<br />

count in defining the global city as an object of<br />

analysis. It theorizes these other urban spaces<br />

from the experiences of those excluded from the<br />

processes of global capitalism and industrialization<br />

heralded by more traditional global <strong>cities</strong><br />

literature. Second, it engages with these other spatial<br />

locations, not merely as spaces of exclusion<br />

but also as sites of engagement. In response to living<br />

in conditions of marginalization and poverty,<br />

O<br />

575<br />

new subjectivities and new ways of engaging<br />

emerge, including strategies for making claims to<br />

rights to the city. Within this critical interdisciplinary<br />

approach to other global <strong>cities</strong> and<br />

“urban” forms, two general trends can be distinguished:<br />

theorizing these other spaces as sites of<br />

exclusion and as places of resistance and<br />

cosmopolitanism.<br />

Globalization, Urbanization,<br />

and the Global City<br />

The literature describes global <strong>cities</strong> as nodal<br />

points of accumulation and organization in the<br />

grid of globalization. Typically, global <strong>cities</strong> are<br />

portrayed as either urban centers of advanced production<br />

and capital accumulation in the world<br />

economy or as a network of flows from urban<br />

spaces based on linkages between advanced services,<br />

production, and markets. Seminal in developing<br />

the concept, Saskia Sassen’s work depicted<br />

the global city as a command and control center in<br />

the global capitalist economy. It was a place where<br />

financial capital and a transnational class of skilled<br />

professionals concentrated together with a large<br />

pool of immigrant (often female) low-wage labor,<br />

engaged in the informal, service and care economies.<br />

Consequently, Sassen saw global <strong>cities</strong> as<br />

places where identity became “unmoored” from<br />

territory, with new transnational forms of politics<br />

emerging as a result. Global <strong>cities</strong> thus initially<br />

represented a reconfiguration of the dominant collective<br />

geographical and political imagination such<br />

that it was no longer possible to discuss “first” and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!