13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

goals and objectives for the plan. Proposals<br />

emphasize systemwide improvements to roads<br />

and public transit, cycling networks, and<br />

pedestrian facilities and are meant to deliver<br />

benefits over the entire region. Strategic regional<br />

transportation plans typically cover a 20- to<br />

25-year time horizon, with more detailed local<br />

area plans covering 5- and 10-year periods.<br />

5. Evaluation: The proposed changes are tested in<br />

the simulation models to measure how outcomes<br />

differ, depending on whether the proposals are<br />

implemented. The outcomes of the simulations are<br />

then evaluated against the goals and objectives set<br />

for the plans. If the proposed changes to the<br />

transportation system will not deliver the desired<br />

benefits, then new infrastructure proposals are put<br />

forward to better achieve the stated goals and<br />

objectives for the plan.<br />

6. Decision and Implementation: At the conclusion<br />

of the planning process, and based on the<br />

evaluation, a strategic plan is produced that<br />

recommends the general location and phasing for<br />

new transportation facilities. The planned<br />

investments are intended to maximize the<br />

efficiency of the entire regional transportation<br />

network.<br />

Critique of Traditional<br />

Transportation Planning Process<br />

Beginning in the 1960s, the highly structured, rational<br />

comprehensive model of transportation planning<br />

came under considerable academic and<br />

community criticism. In some academic circles,<br />

there were criticisms that planners were not merely<br />

dispassionate, rational analysts who systematically<br />

weighed the costs and benefits of an initiative;<br />

rather, their rationality was bounded by their context,<br />

in particular the social and political organizations<br />

in which they worked. Moreover, transportation<br />

problems were not always well defined, and planners<br />

did not necessarily have access to full information or<br />

the time needed to weigh all the options fully.<br />

Ultimately, it was argued that far from being impartial<br />

rational analysts, transportation planners faced<br />

nontechnical pressures that shaped their studies.<br />

Some academics and community groups<br />

expressed wider discontent with the way that the<br />

opinions of experts and government bureaucrats<br />

Transportation Planning<br />

829<br />

were given precedence over the views of the general<br />

public, often resulting in the approval of projects<br />

that did not meet the interests of diverse<br />

community stakeholders. There were claims that<br />

the highly structured planning framework emphasized<br />

the supply of new infrastructure, and in particular<br />

new highways, to address identified transportation<br />

problems, rather than examining options to manage<br />

the regional demand for transportation services.<br />

In many instances, marginalized populations<br />

were seen to be disproportionately affected by the<br />

negative environmental and social exclusion externalities<br />

of new transportation investments, without<br />

realizing many of the benefits from being<br />

connected to new facilities. Finally, it was argued<br />

that transportation planning was an inherently<br />

political process, and the projects that were ultimately<br />

selected for construction were not necessarily<br />

those that were most highly prioritized in the<br />

technical studies.<br />

Across North America in the 1960s, protests<br />

were mounted against urban highway proposals in<br />

New York, San Francisco, Toronto, and Vancouver.<br />

Opponents focused on the way that decisions were<br />

being made, particularly the lack of public involvement<br />

in the decision-making process, and on the<br />

negative impacts experienced by local communities.<br />

Many of these planned highways were cancelled,<br />

and these protests shifted the methods for<br />

doing transportation planning.<br />

Fragmented Directions (1976–Present)<br />

Since the mid-1970s, no dominant framework has<br />

replaced the traditional model of transportation<br />

planning. Rather, there has been considerable fragmentation<br />

in the methods and approaches used to<br />

produce strategic transportation plans. Technically,<br />

increasingly powerful computers have made it possible<br />

to move from aggregate regional forecasting<br />

models to disaggregated simulations of travel behavior.<br />

Using extensive household surveys and personal<br />

trip diaries, planners collect extensive demographic,<br />

socioeconomic, and travel data, which are then used<br />

to more accurately predict daily traffic flow volumes<br />

on local facilities. In many contexts, longrange,<br />

regionwide strategic planning has given way<br />

to a greater focus on the production of short-term<br />

plans, which more specifically emphasize the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!