13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

274 Florence, Italy<br />

the flâneur that remained paradigmatic for much<br />

of the twentieth century.<br />

Although still connected to the modern city,<br />

Benjamin’s flâneur became the universal symbol<br />

of commodity culture as embodied by the modern<br />

intellectual who was forced to sell himself in<br />

the capitalist market. The commodified flâneur<br />

assumed the attributes of the nineteenth-century<br />

badaud, who had also been characterized by passivity<br />

and self-loss. In Benjamin’s tragic reformulation<br />

of flânerie, the passive and active sides of<br />

the flâneur were once again splintered off from<br />

each other, with the commodified flâneur assuming<br />

the role of the badaud and the modernist artist<br />

that of the creative flâneur.<br />

The acceleration of social and cultural transformations<br />

in the late twentieth century has given rise<br />

to an even more multifaceted image of the flâneur.<br />

Linked to an ever-widening range of phenomena,<br />

from the cinema and cyberspace to global tourism<br />

and the themed environments of Las Vegas and<br />

Disneyland, the postmodern flâneur has sometimes<br />

been accused of losing all coherence as a<br />

meaningful cultural symbol. According to some<br />

critics, this figure bears few traces of the historical<br />

flâneur who flourished in the Parisian arcades of<br />

the early nineteenth century. A symbol of a commodified<br />

and aestheticized culture, he has become<br />

“a pure sign, a signifier freed from, bereft of, any<br />

special signified,” according to Gilloch.<br />

While such observations are undeniable, it is<br />

important to stress that the postmodern flâneur’s<br />

continuity with the past lies precisely in his instability<br />

as a cultural image. For the flâneur was,<br />

from his inception, characterized by mobility and<br />

resistance to stable definitions and essentialized<br />

identities. Compared to the reassuring promises<br />

of scientific objectivity and political analysis, the<br />

flâneur undoubtedly offers only a mobile and<br />

contingent image of the social world. Yet, he also<br />

provides an invaluable corrective to the objectivist<br />

perspective of the traditional social sciences.<br />

The flâneur’s intimate association with the world<br />

of popular culture opens up new possibilities for<br />

conceptualizing the shifting constellations of modern<br />

experience. More important still, his affirmation<br />

of the discursive world of culture legitimates<br />

the individual’s freedom to create meaning within<br />

the destabilized environment of modernity.<br />

Mary Gluck<br />

See also Benjamin, Walter; Cinematic Urbanism;<br />

Photography and the City; Paris, France<br />

Further Readings<br />

Baudelaire, Charles. 1965. The Painter of Modern Life<br />

and Other Essays. Translated and edited by Jonathan<br />

Mayne. London: Phaidon.<br />

Benjamin, Walter. 1973. Charles Baudelaire: A Lyric<br />

Poet in the Era of High Capitalism. Translated by<br />

Harry Zohn. London; New York: Verso.<br />

———. 1999. The Arcades Project. Cambridge, MA:<br />

Harvard University Press.<br />

Buck-Morss, Susan. 1986. “The Flâneur, the<br />

Sandwichman, and the Whore: The Politics of<br />

Loitering.” New German Critique 39(Fall):99–140.<br />

Cohen, Margaret. 1995. “Panoramic Literature and the<br />

Invention of Everyday Genres.” Pp. 227–52 in Cinema<br />

and the Invention of Modern Life, edited by Leo<br />

Charney and Vanessa Schwartz. Berkeley: University<br />

of California Press.<br />

De Lacroix, Auguste. 1841. “Le Flâneur.” Pp. 66–72 in<br />

Les Français peints par eux-mêmes: Encyclopédie<br />

morale du dix-neuvième siècle (The French Painted<br />

Themselves: Moral Encyclopedia of the Nineteenth<br />

Century), Vol. 4, edited by Léon Curmer.<br />

Friedberg, Ann. 1993. Window Shopping: Cinema and the<br />

Postmodern. Berkeley: University of California Press.<br />

Gilloch, Graeme. 1997. “‘The Figure That Fascinates’:<br />

Seductive Strangers in Benjamin and Baudrillard.”<br />

Renaissance and Modern Studies, 40:17–29.<br />

Gluck, Mary. 2003. “The Flâneur and the Aesthetic<br />

Appropriation of Urban Culture in Mid-nineteenthcentury<br />

Paris.” Theory, Culture, and Society<br />

20(5):53–80.<br />

Hartman, Maren. 2004. Technologies and Utopias: The<br />

Cyberflaneur and the Experience of “Being Online.”<br />

Munich: Fischer.<br />

Hollevoet, Christel. 2001. “The Flaneur: Genealogy of a<br />

Modernist Icon.” PhD dissertation, City University of<br />

New York.<br />

Prendergast, Christopher. 1992. Paris and the Nineteenth<br />

Century. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.<br />

Tester, Keith, ed. 1994. The Flaneur. London; New York:<br />

Routledge.<br />

Fl o r E n c E, it a l y<br />

Florence is as much a complex cultural phenomenon<br />

as a physical place, and it is this culture that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!