13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

often cited as the country’s most beautiful. Its<br />

downtown area in particular has successfully balanced<br />

the needs of architecture and open space,<br />

pedestrians and automobiles, in a harmonious<br />

manner that is seen as a model for redefining<br />

urban design principles in the twenty-first century.<br />

Beyond its downtown and ring of historic streetcar<br />

suburbs, however, Savannah has witnessed the<br />

same unremarkable urban sprawl that characterizes<br />

most other American <strong>cities</strong>.<br />

The city was founded in 1733 by General James<br />

Oglethorpe, the leader of a philanthropic corporation<br />

of English gentlemen granted trusteeship of<br />

the colony of Georgia. They sought to establish a<br />

charitable colony for England’s urban poor and continental<br />

refugees of religious persecution. Oglethorpe’s<br />

urban plan for Savannah provided a map for this<br />

egalitarian idealism, rooted in Christian charity and<br />

the growing spirit of rationalism of his day.<br />

Oglethorpe sited his colonial capital 17 miles<br />

inland from the Atlantic Ocean on the south bank<br />

of the Savannah River, where the ground rose<br />

about 40 feet above the water—truly high ground<br />

in a coastal region dominated by tidal marshes and<br />

low-lying barrier islands.<br />

The Original Oglethorpe Plan<br />

Oglethorpe devised a plan linking the region to the<br />

city in which each freeholder received a roughly<br />

45-acre farm lot, a 5-acre garden lot, and a 60-by-<br />

90-foot town lot. His city plan comprised a cellular<br />

network of six wards, configured in two rows<br />

of three. Each ward centered on a public square<br />

flanked the east and west by pairs of “trust lots”<br />

reserved for public buildings as determined by the<br />

trustees. To the north and south of the square and<br />

trust lots lay four residential “tything” blocks,<br />

each comprising ten lots set in two rows of five<br />

divided by a lane. The 1733 plan also incorporated<br />

a graduated hierarchy of impressively wide civic<br />

streets and narrower utilitarian streets, each in full<br />

and half-width versions. Civic streets make contact<br />

with the central square in each ward—the 75-footwide<br />

streets aligning with the center of the square<br />

and the central east–west street (now Broughton<br />

Street) dividing the two rows of wards, along with<br />

the 37½-foot-wide streets skirting the edges of the<br />

squares, while the utilitarian streets make no contact<br />

with the squares and (at first) had no buildings<br />

Savannah, Georgia<br />

689<br />

fronting them—that is, the 45-foot-wide north–<br />

south streets dividing the wards and the 22½-footwide<br />

lanes dividing the tything lots. These distinctions<br />

between civic and utilitarian streets persist to the<br />

present day.<br />

Historians have cited an impressive range of<br />

potential sources of inspiration for the Oglethorpe<br />

plan. The appearance of multiple squares in<br />

Savannah strongly resembles the network of<br />

squares developed in London’s west end, beginning<br />

in the late seventeenth century. The specific<br />

configuration of streets and public space, however,<br />

may derive from the Renaissance town plans or the<br />

Forbidden City in Beijing. Freemasonry may have<br />

influenced the specific size of the streets.<br />

Expansion of the Plan<br />

The evolution and incremental growth of the city<br />

plan distinguished Savannah from other planned<br />

<strong>cities</strong> of the period. In founding Savannah,<br />

Oglethorpe laid out a relatively modest town of six<br />

wards. He initially plotted out only what was necessary,<br />

but he allowed for growth as needed by<br />

surrounding the town with a common. The expansion<br />

of Savannah’s plan into the common through<br />

a series of at least six separate phases illustrated<br />

the remarkable flexibility of Oglethorpe’s ward<br />

system. Unlike a typical grid with fixed dimensions,<br />

the specific dimensions and even the relative<br />

proportions of a Savannah ward could be elongated<br />

or compressed without removing any components<br />

or detracting from its inherently human<br />

scale. For example, the wards added in the 1790s<br />

to the east and west of the original six wards were<br />

modified to fit the available common land by<br />

diminishing the size of the square and reducing the<br />

number of tything lots.<br />

The planning logic inherent in the Savannah plan<br />

guided architectural development in the city’s downtown<br />

area since Oglethorpe’s time. Public buildings<br />

were allocated prominent sites on trust lots in each<br />

ward, effectively distributing institutions of government,<br />

commerce, and religion throughout the town<br />

and thereby stemming the emergence of a dominant<br />

center of power. Over time, the end tything lots facing<br />

the square became desirable for prominent mansions<br />

and commercial buildings.<br />

The configuration of residential building lots in<br />

Savannah resulted in a distinctive housing form. In

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!