13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in <strong>cities</strong> are entangled with those in others. Thus<br />

some parts of the city may be connected by electronic<br />

flows to a set of remote other centers, while<br />

other parts may be connected by different flows to<br />

another set of <strong>cities</strong>. There are then networked<br />

subeconomies that link translocally.<br />

Urban Constellations<br />

The city breaks into urban constellations scattered<br />

through huge territorial expanses binding together<br />

technoburbs, real virtual spaces, and so forth, rather<br />

than unified <strong>cities</strong>. This urban fragmentation,<br />

Castells has suggested, produces a dual city, sharply<br />

divided between prosperous knowledge workers<br />

and those incapable of finding a place in the new<br />

economy (other than, ironically, in servicing the<br />

needs of knowledge workers for babysitting, housecleaning,<br />

and other such activities). According to<br />

Castells, the dual city is simultaneously “globally<br />

connected and locally disconnected.”<br />

Rather than seeing a dual city outcome though,<br />

the city is decomposed in more complex ways<br />

than simply the connected and disconnected.<br />

Rather there are degrees of control over those<br />

flows. So while the vision of the dual city of digital<br />

elite and excluded others certainly has resonance,<br />

it is by no means the be-all and end-all of<br />

the story. Globalized telecommunications are<br />

altering the rhythms of urban life to produce new<br />

patterns of disjuncture and differentiation. Female<br />

employees in call centers in Bangalore are now<br />

part of a different space of flows—answering to<br />

the temporality of U.S. markets, the night shift is<br />

a time trap emphasizing their marginal employment<br />

status in the city in which they live and as a<br />

new global pink-collar labor force. This digital<br />

economy’s work regimes are far from those of a<br />

global elite. In terms of the city, these call center<br />

workers are part of the city where they live and<br />

work and the <strong>cities</strong> (usually Western ones) whose<br />

populations they service. Such global rhythms<br />

give rise to what Castells sees matching the space<br />

of flows, that is, crystallized or timeless time. He<br />

suggests a sequence of hegemonic forms of temporality,<br />

with industrial capitalism producing and<br />

produced by clock time and now informational<br />

capitalism entailing a time in which linearity is<br />

replaced by instantaneity and discontinuity rather<br />

than predictable sequence. The space of flows<br />

Spaces of Flows<br />

761<br />

dissolves time by disordering the sequence of<br />

events and making them simultaneous.<br />

The space of flows also creates new possibilities<br />

for grassroots actors. A range of movements and<br />

nongovernmental organizations have been enabled<br />

by global networks, which are learning from each<br />

other, forming new structures of alliances, and so<br />

forth. Equally the flows of poorer workers, though<br />

often heavily policed, create new flows of ideas,<br />

remittances, and new urban cultures. Critics such as<br />

Smith point out that much of the work of Castells<br />

lends itself to seeing the overriding of emplaced<br />

politics via the global space of flows. There is a<br />

tendency to portray the flows as “out there” linking<br />

places rather than also “in here,” and to frame<br />

global and local social processes in binary opposition,<br />

as mutually exclusive and inherently antagonistic<br />

explanations for urban development that pit<br />

local cultures against globalizing economic transformations.<br />

The risk is to imply that flows are<br />

always dynamically global while stubborn resistance<br />

is the best that places can muster. Instead one<br />

might more productively see the weaving of different<br />

spaces of flows through the urban fabric.<br />

Mike A. Crang<br />

See also Castells, Manuel; Cyburbia; Globalization;<br />

Informational City; Non-Place Realm; Sassen, Saskia;<br />

Technoburbs; World City<br />

Further Readings<br />

Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society:<br />

Networks and Identity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.<br />

———. 2000. “Grassrooting the Space of Flows.”<br />

Pp. 18–27 in Cities in the Telecommunications Age: The<br />

Fracturing of Geographies, edited by J. Wheeler, Y.<br />

Aoyama, and B. Warf. London: Routledge.<br />

———. 2002. “Local and Global: Cities in the Network<br />

Society.” Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale<br />

Geografie 93(5):548–58.<br />

Sassen, S. 2001. “Impacts of Information Communication<br />

Technologies on Urban Economies and Politics.”<br />

International Journal of Urban and Regional Research<br />

25(2):411–18.<br />

———. 2002. Global Networks, Linked Cities. New<br />

York: Routledge.<br />

Smith, M. P. 2001. Transnational Urbanism: Locating<br />

Globalization. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!