13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

744 Social Production of Space<br />

accumulation and urban development become a<br />

source of its legitimacy. Lefebvre grasps the active<br />

role of the state in facilitating capital accumulation<br />

in terms of the “state mode of accumulation.”<br />

The role of the state in the production of space<br />

is multifaceted and extensive. In conjunction<br />

with the movement of capital, the modus operandi<br />

of the state is centrifugal. The geographical<br />

expansion of capitalism, such as the organization<br />

of new spatial divisions of labor and the opening<br />

of new markets, is usually backed by the political,<br />

economic, and military power of the state.<br />

With the controlling power over global financial<br />

institutions (e.g., the International Monetary<br />

Fund), the United States forced Indonesia,<br />

Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan to open<br />

their financial markets during the Asian crisis in<br />

the late 1990s.<br />

The state intervenes in space and creates the conditions<br />

for capital accumulation in a variety of<br />

ways. The state fabricates urban space as a force of<br />

production through direct expenses and regulatory<br />

practices, including the construction of social infrastructures,<br />

the provision of public services, and the<br />

subsidization of business enterprises. In addition,<br />

the state attracts and channels investment into the<br />

built environment by providing fiscal incentives<br />

such as land grants, low interest loans, tax breaks,<br />

utility discounts, and other public subsidies.<br />

Furthermore, the state plays an entrepreneurial role<br />

in place marketing: It dramatizes the locational<br />

advantages by lifting the regulatory barriers to private<br />

profit making and by projecting a good business<br />

climate.<br />

The production of space is most discernable in<br />

the context of the crisis tendencies of capitalism.<br />

The falling rate of profits is precipitated by the<br />

chronic problem of overaccumulation and underconsumption.<br />

Sponsored by financial and state<br />

institutions, capital has battled with the falling rate<br />

of profit by implementing new production systems<br />

and opening new markets. These spatial practices<br />

of capital and the state leave marks on space:<br />

Woven by an ensemble of exchange networks,<br />

infrastructure linkages, and institutional arrangements,<br />

the urban fabric is part of the means of<br />

production. The geographical extension of capital<br />

is not the whole story of crisis-induced restructuring,<br />

however. The switching of investment into the<br />

built environment is another aspect of what David<br />

Harvey called the “spatio-temporal fix” as a<br />

response to the crisis tendencies of capitalism.<br />

The Role of Real Estate<br />

The flow of investment into the built environment<br />

is a cardinal moment in the production of space.<br />

Real estate, along with construction, is a separate<br />

source of profit: Driven by real estate interests,<br />

capitalists transform land into the exchange value<br />

of abstract space. During the economic downturns,<br />

in particular, surplus money and capital find an<br />

outlet for investment in real estate. According to<br />

Lefebvre, such a second circuit of capital in the real<br />

estate sector has become an active part of capital<br />

accumulation and has played a leading role in<br />

urban (uneven) development.<br />

The operation of the real estate sector is orchestrated<br />

by land-based interest groups (e.g., developers,<br />

speculators, investors, government officials),<br />

financial institutions (e.g., banks, mortgage companies,<br />

insurance companies, pension funds), and<br />

government-sponsored programs (e.g., loan guarantees,<br />

subsidies, tax deferrals). These various<br />

actors are coalesced into growth networks that<br />

influence land development decisions, channel<br />

investment into certain directions, and determine<br />

land-use patterns. The actual composition of<br />

growth networks may differ from place to place,<br />

and a local area may have various competing<br />

growth networks; yet, they are deeply involved<br />

in the production of the built environment and<br />

major real estate development projects, such as the<br />

construction of industrial parks, office towers,<br />

malls, master-planned communities, and resort<br />

complexes.<br />

The metropolitan real estate market is huge and<br />

growing. The globalization of the real estate market<br />

is an emerging trend: Land and the built environment<br />

on it are immobile but are converted into<br />

a fluid commodity like other commodities in the<br />

global market. The key to the globalization of real<br />

estate is state intervention; the liquidity of real<br />

estate has increased with the medium of state-<br />

sponsored financing mechanisms, including secondary<br />

mortgage markets, mortgage-backed security<br />

markets, and real estate investment trusts. With<br />

these mediating schemes, real estate can be tied to<br />

the global capital market, and the second circuit<br />

of capital becomes a global process. Increase in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!