13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

944 Urban Village<br />

of Italian American immigrants in the West End<br />

of Boston in 1957 and 1958. This anthropological<br />

and sociological work challenged the assumptions<br />

of planners about the nature or life within areas<br />

designated as slums. Gans defined the area as an<br />

urban village, as he found new groups of residents<br />

trying to adapt their “village like” institutions and<br />

cultures to the distinctly urban milieu.<br />

Adopting a more idealistic position, A. Magnaghi<br />

adopted the term in the translation of his<br />

“Il progetto locale,” which discusses the importance<br />

of very localized forms of governance in the<br />

delivery of more sustainable forms of urban<br />

development.<br />

However, the term urban village was promoted<br />

most vigorously in the United Kingdom by the<br />

Urban Villages Group in the late 1980s and 1990s.<br />

This group used it to describe development that<br />

was guided by a set of principles that called for<br />

well-designed, mixed use, and sustainable urban<br />

areas that created a sense of place and community<br />

commitment. The concept was derived not only<br />

from the legitimacy established by the Urban<br />

Villages Group (later renamed the Urban Villages<br />

Forum) but also from its initial endorsement by the<br />

U.K. government in national planning policy guidance<br />

for the planning and design of housing.<br />

Subsequently, however, it was superseded in government<br />

discourse by different concepts, notably<br />

with regard to urban renaissance and millennium<br />

villages.<br />

The context was one of increasing concern with<br />

the quality of modern urban development, especially<br />

when compared with older, more traditional<br />

areas. In addition, the property recession of the<br />

late 1980s and early 1990s also meant that development<br />

professionals were willing to reconsider<br />

their approaches. The promotion of the concept<br />

was achieved by a small group of developers,<br />

investors, architects, and planners brought together<br />

by the Prince of Wales to form the Urban Villages<br />

Group, a nonprofit advocacy group. In 1992 the<br />

group’s manifesto was published, in the form of a<br />

book, titled Urban Villages: A Concept for Creating<br />

Mixed-Use Urban Developments on a Sustainable<br />

Scale. The Prince, driven by his widely publicized<br />

thinking on architecture, human values, and community,<br />

led the call for a return to more human<br />

scale and aesthetic development based on an analysis<br />

of how “good” places were designed.<br />

In addition, legitimacy for the concept was<br />

derived through adoption of a variety of discourses<br />

that resonated with both old and new planning<br />

and design orthodoxies. Ideas such as proximity<br />

and locality, which were central to the urban village,<br />

reflected neighborhood planning ideals originating<br />

in the 1920s. Promoters emphasized the<br />

village-like characteristics found in certain parts of<br />

some <strong>cities</strong> which have been discussed for decades<br />

in urban geography and sociology. Particularly<br />

important to any proponents of the urban village<br />

has been the work of Jane Jacobs with her concerns<br />

for diversity and mixing uses. The concept<br />

drew attention to the need for community involvement<br />

so that communities are given a stake in their<br />

neighborhoods. This thinking was already popular<br />

in the fields of community architecture and urban<br />

design, and promoters of the urban village also<br />

therefore found a receptive audience for this aspect<br />

of their approach. A commitment to urban design<br />

also dovetailed with the U.K. government’s contemporary<br />

agenda, which was being explored<br />

through its Quality in Town and Country Initiative<br />

and subsequent Urban Design Campaign. These<br />

were related initiatives to promote greater awareness<br />

of urban design and both interdisciplinary<br />

working and public and private sector partnerships<br />

in the development of significant sites within<br />

established urban areas. The work drew on the<br />

experiences of a number of specific case studies<br />

that were promoted in the United Kingdom.<br />

Similar development concepts were also being<br />

endorsed at the time in the United States; for<br />

example, transit-oriented development, pedestrian<br />

pockets, new urbanism, and traditional neighborhood<br />

development, and the international nature of<br />

the thinking, struck a cord within U.K. urban<br />

policy, planning, and development circles. Finally,<br />

during the late 1980s and early 1990s there<br />

emerged an increased interest in sustainable forms<br />

of development; the urban village concept drew on<br />

this, albeit within a relatively narrow definition. In<br />

the early 1990s, work to identify key principles<br />

and to refine the urban village development concept<br />

was on the model of new building schemes<br />

such as urban extensions on green field sites.<br />

Publications indicated that major new residential<br />

developments within the United Kingdom should<br />

take the form of urban villages with 3,000 to<br />

5,000 people, a focal village square, everything

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!