13.12.2012 Views

ancient cities

ancient cities

ancient cities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Non-places are mediated spaces that facilitate<br />

movement. They are full of signs, instructions, and<br />

regulations. One navigates a non-place by following<br />

the signs that designate where one is in terms<br />

of a system of organized public movement. Alphanumeric<br />

signs designate destinations and distances<br />

(for instance, Gate 6, Homewares on the 2nd Floor,<br />

London 20kms) and also provide conditions of use<br />

(for instance, speed limit 100k, no smoking, automatic<br />

consent for surveillance). In this mode of<br />

spatiality, people experience each other anonymously.<br />

They may see the same people every day<br />

on the same bus or at the same shopping mall, but<br />

they never know the other’s name socially. In nonplaces,<br />

people tend to be identified only for purpose<br />

of verification. As Auge famously noted, there will<br />

be no anonymity without identity checks.<br />

In the late capitalist context, spaces of transit,<br />

like airports, shopping malls, and highways, are<br />

becoming ubiquitous as urban forms, and as a<br />

consequence, the concept of non-place is gaining<br />

prominence and relevance.<br />

See also Airports; Shopping Center; Tourism<br />

Further Readings<br />

Gillian Fuller<br />

Auge, Marc. 1995. Non-places: An Introduction to an<br />

Anthropology of Supermodernity. Translated by<br />

J. Howe. London: Verso.<br />

de Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life.<br />

Translated by Steven Rendall. Berkeley: University of<br />

California Press.<br />

No N -se x i s t ci t y<br />

It has long been established, from research in the<br />

fields of urban geography, history, sociology, philosophy,<br />

and urban planning, that the city is sexist.<br />

Change is not easy to achieve because the city<br />

is the outward manifestation of deeply held<br />

assumptions about women’s role in society. These<br />

are transmitted onto the design of towns and <strong>cities</strong><br />

through the urban planning system and through<br />

the decision-making powers of planners, architects,<br />

surveyors, engineers, and city managers. All these<br />

Non-Sexist City<br />

569<br />

professions remain male-dominated, and so few<br />

women have a voice at the policy-making level.<br />

Indeed “more women” does not necessarily mean<br />

“better policy,” such are the powers of professional<br />

socialization and the need to conform to succeed.<br />

Women at a Disadvantage<br />

So what is the problem? Although planning is<br />

for people, it has been shown that women suffer<br />

disadvantage within a built environment that is<br />

developed by men, primarily for other men.<br />

Women make up the majority of public transport<br />

users, the elderly, the disabled, shoppers, care providers,<br />

and the ethnic minority population. Much<br />

of urban sociology, social policy, and urban criminology<br />

has traditionally focused on the experience,<br />

work, and problems of men, not least on the problems<br />

experienced by the male aggressor as against<br />

the female victim within the inner city. Women<br />

have been seen stereotypically as suburban housewives<br />

or bored wives, or simply as invisible,<br />

whereas, in reality, the female population includes<br />

a wide range of social-class groups, incomes, and<br />

levels of education. Women live in all sorts of<br />

places of residence: just like men, who are also not<br />

a unitary group. Women were categorized according<br />

to the social class of either their father or their<br />

husband and failed to capture the true position of<br />

women in society, economically, socially, and culturally.<br />

This was the custom until feminism began<br />

to reshape sociological study and to demonstrate<br />

the differences between women’s and men’s experience<br />

of work, the city, and life itself.<br />

Women have distinct roles and responsibilities<br />

in society, all of which generate different usage of<br />

urban space. Fewer women than men have access<br />

to the use of a car, and thus, most public-transport<br />

users are women whose daily travel patterns are<br />

more complex than men’s because many are combining<br />

work with child care and other home-<br />

making commitments. This has implications for all<br />

levels of policy making, including the citywide<br />

macro level of overall strategic policy, the district<br />

meso level of local planning, and the detailed micro<br />

level of daily practicalities, as explained below.<br />

At the macro level of overall urban form and<br />

structure, <strong>cities</strong> have traditionally been zoned and<br />

the land uses divided according to male life experience,<br />

on the basis of separating out home and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!