22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

990 After absorption, piroxicam is extensively (99%) bound to

plasma proteins. Concentrations in plasma and synovial fluid are

similar at steady state (e.g., after 7-12 days). Less than 5% of the

drug is excreted into the urine unchanged. The major metabolic

transformation in humans is hydroxylation of the pyridyl ring (predominantly

by an isozyme of the CYP2C subfamily), and this inactive

metabolite and its glucuronide conjugate account for ~60% of

the drug excreted in the urine and feces.

SECTION IV

INFLAMMATION, IMMUNOMODULATION, AND HEMATOPOIESIS

Therapeutic Uses. Piroxicam is approved in the U.S. for the treatment

of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Due to its slow onset

of action and delayed attainment of steady state, it is less suited for

acute analgesia but has been used to treat acute gout. The usual daily

dose is 20 mg, and because of the long t 1/2

, steady-state blood levels

are not reached for 7-12 days.

Adverse Events. Approximately 20% of patients experience side

effects with piroxicam, and ~5% of patients discontinue use because

of these effects. In 2007, the European Medicines Agency reviewed

the safety of orally administered piroxicam and concluded that its

benefits outweigh its risks, but advised it should no longer be used

first-line, nor should it be used for the treatment of acute (short-term)

pain and inflammation. Piroxicam was singled out for special review

because of signals that it is associated with more GI and serious skin

reactions than other nonselective NSAIDs.

Meloxicam

Therapeutic Uses. Meloxicam (MOBIC, others) is FDA-approved for

use in osteoarthritis. It has been reviewed (Davies and Skjodt, 1999;

Fleischmann et al., 2002). The recommended dose for meloxicam is

7.5-15 mg once daily.

Adverse Events. On average, meloxicam demonstrates ~10-fold

COX-2 selectivity in ex vivo assays. However, this is quite variable,

and a clinical advantage or hazard has yet to be established for the

drug. Indeed, even with surrogate markers, the relationship to dose

is nonlinear. There is significantly less gastric injury compared to

piroxicam (20 mg/day) in subjects treated with 7.5 mg/day of

meloxicam, but the advantage is lost with a dosage of 15 mg/day.

Other Oxicams

A number of other oxicam derivatives are under study or in use outside

the U.S. These include several prodrugs of piroxicam (ampiroxicam,

droxicam, and pivoxicam), which have been designed to reduce

GI irritation. However, as with sulindac, any theoretical diminution in

gastric toxicity associated with administration of a prodrug is offset

by gastric COX-1 inhibition from active drug circulating systemically.

Other oxicams under study or in use outside the U.S. include

lornoxicam, cinnoxicam, sudoxicam, and tenoxicam. The efficacy

and toxicity of these drugs are similar to those of piroxicam.

Lornoxicam is unique among the enolic acid derivatives in that it has

a rapid onset of action and a relatively short t 1/2

(3-5 hours).

PYRAZOLON DERIVATIVES

This group of drugs includes phenylbutazone, oxyphenbutazone,

antipyrine, aminopyrine, and dipyrone; currently, only antipyrine

eardrops are available for human use in the U.S. These drugs were

used clinically for many years but have essentially been abandoned

because of their propensity to cause irreversible agranulocytosis.

Dipyrone was reintroduced in the E.U. a decade ago because epidemiological

studies suggested that the risk of adverse effects was

similar to that of acetaminophen and lower than that of aspirin.

However, the use of dipyrone remains limited. The pyrazolone derivatives

are discussed in previous editions of this book and may be

accessed on the G&G website.

DIARYL HETEROCYCLIC

COX-2–SELECTIVE NSAIDS

The first COX-2–selective NSAIDs were diaryl heterocyclic

coxibs. Celecoxib is the only such compound

still approved in the U.S. Etoricoxib is approved in several

countries; rofecoxib and valdecoxib were withdrawn

worldwide and have been discussed in previous

editions. Parecoxib is a water soluble, injectable prodrug

of valdecoxib marketed for treatment of acute pain

in several countries. Lumiracoxib, a structural analog

of the phenylacetic acid derivative diclofenac, also is

not available in the U.S. and has been discussed earlier

(see “Lumiracoxib”).

Chemistry. Most members of the diaryl heterocyclic family of selective

COX-2 inhibitors consist of a central 1,2-diaryl heterocyclic

moiety. Celecoxib is a diaryl substituted pyrazole compound; valdecoxib

is a diaryl substituted isoxazol derivative. Valdecoxib was

made water soluble for parenteral use (parecoxib) by coupling propionic

acid via an amide group to its sulfonamide moiety. Etoricoxib

is slightly different; it is a monoaryl substituted bipyridine, which

results in a three-ring configuration that is superimposable onto the

diaryl heterocyclic pharmacophore. Celecoxib, valdecoxib, and its

prodrug parecoxib contain a sulfonamide moiety that bares the risk

for cross-reactivity in patients with sulfonamide hypersensitivity and,

thus, must be avoided in such patients. Etoricoxib has a methylsulfonyl

group that is thought to be free of such risk.

Mechanism of Action. Compounds with higher affinity for COX-2

than COX-1 were identified in screens of combinatorial libraries.

Subsequent crystallography revealed a hydrophobic pocket in the

substrate binding channel of COX-2, which is absent in COX-1

(Figure 34–2). Thus, selective inhibitors of COX-2 are molecules

with side chains—the third ring—that fit within this hydrophobic

pocket but are too large to block COX-1 with equally high affinity.

There is considerable difference in response to the coxibs among

individuals (Fries et al., 2006), and it is not known how the degree

of selectivity may relate to either efficacy or adverse effect profile,

although it seems likely to be related to both. No controlled clinical

trials comparing outcomes among the coxibs have been performed.

Several tNSAIDs (e.g., nimesulide, diclofenac, meloxicam) exhibit

relative selectivity for COX-2 inhibition in whole blood assays that

resembles that of celecoxib (FitzGerald and Patrono, 2001; Brune

and Hinz, 2004).

Therapeutic Uses. All COX-2–selective NSAIDs have been shown

to afford relief from postextraction dental pain and to afford

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!