22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

experimental arrhythmias by increasing gap junction conductance

have been described.

State-Dependent Ion Channel Block

Recent advances have elucidated the structural and

molecular determinants of ion channel permeation and

drug block. This information has begun to play an

increasing role in analyzing the actions of available

and new anti-arrhythmic compounds (MacKinnon,

2003). A key concept is that ion channel–blocking

drugs bind to specific sites on the ion channel proteins

to modify function (e.g., decrease current) and that the

affinity of the ion channel protein for the drug on its

target site will vary as the ion channel protein shuttles

among functional conformations (or ion channel

“states”; see Figure 29–2). Physicochemical characteristics,

such as molecular weight and lipid solubility,

are important determinants of state-dependent binding.

State-dependent binding has been studied most extensively

in the case of Na + channel–blocking drugs. Most

useful agents of this type block open and/or inactivated

Na + channels and have very little affinity for channels

in the resting state. Most Na + channel blockers bind to

a local anesthetic binding site in the pore of Nav1.5,

and drug affinity is reduced with mutation to critical

residues in the pore (Fozzard et al., 2005). Thus, with

each action potential, drugs bind to Na + channels and

block them, and with each diastolic interval, drugs dissociate,

and the block is released.

As illustrated in Figure 29–12, the dissociation

rate is a key determinant of steady-state block of Na +

channels. When heart rate increases, the time available

for dissociation decreases, and steady-state Na + channel

block increases. The rate of recovery from block also

slows as cells are depolarized, as in ischemia. This

explains the finding that Na + channel blockers depress

Na + current, and hence conduction, to a greater extent

in ischemic tissues than in normal tissues. Open versus

inactivated-state block also may be important in determining

the effects of some drugs. Increased APD, which

results in a relative increase in time spent in the inactivated

state, may increase block by drugs that bind to

inactivated channels, such as lidocaine or amiodarone.

The rate of recovery from block often is expressed as a time

constant (τ recovery

, the time required for ~63% of an exponentially

determined process to be complete; Courtney, 1987). In the case of

drugs such as lidocaine, τ recovery

is so short (<<1 s) that recovery from

block is very rapid, and substantial Na + channel block occurs only in

rapidly driven tissues, particularly in ischemia. Conversely, drugs

such as flecainide have such long τ recovery

values (10 s) that roughly

the same number of Na + channels is blocked during systole and diastole.

As a result, marked slowing of conduction occurs even in normal

tissues at normal rates.

Classifying Anti-Arrhythmic Drugs

Classifying drugs by common electrophysiologic properties

emphasizes the connection between basic electrophysiologic

actions and anti-arrhythmic effects

(Vaughan Williams, 1992). To the extent that the

clinical actions of drugs can be predicted from their

basic electrophysiologic properties, such classification

schemes have merit. However, as each compound is

827

CHAPTER 29

ANTI-ARRHYTHMIC DRUGS

KEY

Rest

Open (activated)

Inactivated

% Na + CHANNELS

BLOCKED

100

0

Na + channel blocker

Slower dissociation rate

increases Na + channel block

Tachycardia

increases Na + channel block

Figure 29–12. Recovery from block of Na + channels during diastole. This recovery is the critical factor determining extent of steadystate

Na + channel block. Na + channel blockers bind to (and block) Na + channels in the open and/or inactivated states, resulting in phasic

changes in the extent of block during the action potential. As shown in the middle panel, a decrease in the rate of recovery from

block increases the extent of block. Different drugs have different rates of recovery, and depolarization reduces the rate of recovery.

The right panel shows that increasing heart rate, which results in relatively less time spent in the rest state, also increases the extent

of block. (Modified from Roden et al., 1993, with permission from Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!