22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

918 by H 2

blockade. In asthmatic subjects in particular, histamine-induced

bronchospasm may involve an additional

reflex component that arises from irritation of

afferent vagal nerve endings (Nadel and Barnes, 1984).

SECTION IV

INFLAMMATION, IMMUNOMODULATION, AND HEMATOPOIESIS

The uterus of some species is contracted by histamine; in the

human uterus, gravid or not, the response is negligible. Responses of

intestinal muscle also vary with species and region, but the classical

effect is contraction. Bladder, ureter, gallbladder, iris, and many other

smooth muscle preparations are affected little or inconsistently by

histamine.

Peripheral Nerve Endings: Pain, Itch, and Indirect Effects. Histamine

stimulates various nerve endings and sensory effects. In the epidermis,

it causes itch; in the dermis, it evokes pain, sometimes accompanied

by itching. Stimulant actions on nerve endings, including

autonomic afferents and efferents, contribute to the “flare” component

of the triple response and to indirect effects of histamine on the

bronchi and other organs. In the periphery, neuronal receptors for

histamine are generally of the H 1

type (see Rocha e Silva, 1978;

Ganellin and Parsons, 1982).

Clinical Uses

The practical application of histamine is limited to use

as a diagnostic agent, such as to assess nonspecific

bronchial hyperreactivity in asthmatics or as a positive

control injection during allergy skin testing.

H 1

RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS

History. Antihistamine activity was first demonstrated by Bovet

and Staub in 1937 with one of a series of amines with a phenolic

ether moiety. The substance 2-isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy-ethyldiethyl-amine

protected guinea pigs against several lethal doses of

histamine but was too toxic for clinical use. By 1944, Bovet and his

colleagues had described pyrilamine maleate, an effective histamine

antagonist of this category. The discovery of the highly effective

diphenhydramine and tripelennamine soon followed (Ganellin and

Parsons, 1982). In the 1980s, nonsedating H 1

histamine receptor

antagonists were developed for treatment of allergic diseases.

Despite success in blocking allergic responses to histamine, the H 1

antihistamines failed to inhibit a number of other responses, notably

gastric acid secretion. The discovery of H 2

receptors and H 2

antagonists

by Black and colleagues provided a new class of agents that

antagonized histamine-induced acid secretion (Black et al., 1972).

The pharmacology of these drugs (e.g., cimetidine, famotidine) is

described in Chapter 45.

Pharmacological Properties

Chemistry. All the available H 1

receptor “antagonists” are

actually inverse agonists (see Chapter 3) that reduce constitutive

activity of the receptor and compete with histamine

(Haas et al., 2008): Whereas histamine binding to

the receptor induces a fully active conformation, antihistamine

binding yields an inactive conformation. At the

tissue level, the effect seen is proportional to receptor

occupancy by the antihistamine. Like histamine, many H 1

antagonists contain a substituted ethylamine moiety.

Unlike histamine, which has a primary amino

group and a single aromatic ring, most H 1

antagonists

have a tertiary amino group linked by a two-or threeatom

chain to two aromatic substituents and conform

to the general formula

Ar 1

Ar 2

C C N

X C C N

where Ar is aryl and X is a nitrogen or carbon atom or

a —C—O— ether linkage to the β-aminoethyl side

chain. Sometimes the two aromatic rings are bridged, as

in the tricyclic derivatives, or the ethylamine may be

part of a ring structure (Figure 32–3) (Ganellin and

Parsons, 1982).

Mechanism of Action. Most H 1

antagonists have similar

pharmacological actions and therapeutic applications.

Their effects are largely predictable from

knowledge of the consequences of the activation of H 1

receptors by histamine.

Effects on Physiological Systems.

Smooth Muscle. H 1

antagonists inhibit most of the effects

of histamine on smooth muscles, especially the constriction

of respiratory smooth muscle. For example, a

small dose of histamine causes death by asphyxia in

guinea pigs, yet the animal may survive a hundred

lethal doses of histamine if given an H 1

antagonist. In

the same species, striking protection also is afforded

against anaphylactic bronchospasm. This is not so in

humans, where allergic bronchoconstriction appears to

be caused by a variety of alternative mediators, such as

leukotrienes (Chapter 33).

H 1

antagonists inhibit both the vasoconstrictor

effects of histamine and, to a degree, the more rapid

vasodilator effects mediated by activation of H 1

receptors

on endothelial cells (synthesis/release of NO and

other mediators). Residual vasodilation is due to H 2

receptors on smooth muscle; administration of an H 2

antagonist suppresses the effect. The efficacy of the histamine

antagonists on histamine-induced changes in

systemic blood pressure parallels these vascular effects.

Capillary Permeability. H 1

antagonists strongly block the

increased capillary permeability and formation of

edema and wheal caused by histamine.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!