22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1020 trials. Because they remain experimental, they are discussed

only briefly here.

Co-stimulatory Blockade. Induction of specific immune

responses by T lymphocytes requires two signals: an

antigen-specific signal via the T-cell receptor and a costimulatory

signal provided by the interaction of molecules

such as CD28 on the T lymphocyte and CD80 and

CD86 on the antigen-presenting cell (Figure 35–4;

Khoury et al., 1999).

SECTION IV

INFLAMMATION, IMMUNOMODULATION, AND HEMATOPOIESIS

In preclinical studies, inhibition of the co-stimulatory signal

has been shown to induce tolerance (Weaver et al., 2008).

Experimental approaches to inhibit co-stimulation include a

A

B

APC

MHC

Co-stimulatory

ligand

APC

MHC

MHC

TCR

TCR

T Cell

Co-stimulatory

receptor

T Cell

Co-stimulatory

receptor

TCR

CD154

TCR

Activated

T Cell

Inactivated

T Cell

recombinant fusion protein molecule, CTLA4-Ig, and anti-CD80

and/or anti-CD86 mAbs. The antibodies h1F1 and h3D1 are humanized

anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs, respectively. In vitro, h1F1

and h3D1 block CD28-dependent T-cell proliferation and decrease

mixed lymphocyte reactions. These mAbs must be used in tandem,

because either CD80 or CD86 is sufficient to stimulate T cells via

CD28. In nonhuman primates, anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs were

proven effective in renal transplantation, either as monotherapy or in

combination with steroids or cyclosporine (Weaver et al., 2008), but

did not induce durable tolerance. A phase I study of h1F1 and h3D1

in renal transplant recipients was performed in patients receiving

maintenance therapy consisting of cyclosporine, MMF, and steroids

(Vincenti, 2002). Although the results of this study showed that h1F1

and h3D1 are relatively safe and possibly effective, clinical development

was not further pursued.

CTLA4-Ig (abatacept) contains the binding region of

CTLA4, which is a CD28 homolog, and the constant region of the

human IgG 1

. CTLA4-Ig competitively inhibits CD28. Numerous

animal studies have confirmed the efficacy of CTLA4-Ig in inhibiting

alloimmune responses, resulting in successful organ transplantation.

More recently, CTLA4-Ig was shown to be effective in the

treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. However, CTLA4-Ig was less

effective when utilized in nonhuman primate models of renal

transplantation. Belatacept (LEA29Y) (Figure 35–5) is a secondgeneration

CTLA4-Ig with two amino acid substitutions. Belatacept

has higher affinity for CD80 (2-fold) and CD86 (4-fold), yielding a

10-fold increase in potency in vitro as compared to CTLA4-Ig.

Preclinical renal transplant studies in nonhuman primates showed

that belatacept did not induce tolerance but did prolong graft survival.

Extracellular

portion of CTLA4

(CD152)

APC

CD80/CD86

CD28

T Cell

CD28

CD152

Activated

T Cell

Mutations at

positions 29 and

105 confer

increased potency

Figure 35–4. Co-stimulation. A. Two signals are required for

T-cell activation. Signal 1 is via the T-cell receptor (TCR), and

signal 2 is via a co-stimulatory receptor–ligand pair. Both signals

are required for T-cell activation. Signal 1 in the absence of

signal 2 results in an inactivated T cell. B. One important costimulatory

pathway involves CD28 on the T cell and B7-1

(CD80) and B7-2 (CD86) on the antigen-presenting cell (APC).

After a T cell is activated, it expresses additional co-stimulatory

molecules. CD152 is CD40 ligand, which interacts with CD40 as

a co-stimulatory pair. CD154 (CTLA4) interacts with CD80 and

CD86 to dampen or downregulate an immune response.

Antibodies against CD80, CD86, and CD152 are being evaluated

as potential therapeutic agents. CTLA4-Ig, a chimeric protein

consisting of part of an immunoglobulin molecule and part

of CD154, also has been tested as a therapeutic agent. (Adapted

with permission from Clayberger, C., and Krensky, A.M.

Mechanisms of allograft rejection. In, Immunologic Renal

Diseases. (Nielson, E.G., and Couser, W.G., eds) Lippincott-

Raven, Philadelphia, 2001. (http://lww.com).)

Fragment of FC

domain of lgG1

Figure 35–5. Structure of belatacept, a CLTA4Ig congener. For

details, see the text and Figure 35–4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!