22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cefdinir

Cap: 16-21 a 13-23 b 89 c 11-15 d 1.6-2.1 d 1.4-1.5 Cap: 3 ± 0.7 e Cap:2.9 ± 1.0

μg/mL e

Susp: 25 a b RD Susp: 2 ± 0.4 e

b Iron Susp: 3.9 ± 0.6

μg/mL e

a

Bioavailability following ingestion of a capsule (Cap) or suspension (Susp) formulated dose.

b

Determined after a single oral dose. c Lower plasma protein binding (71-74%) reported in

patients undergoing dialysis. d CL/F and V/F reported. e Following ingestion of a single 600-

mg capsule given to adults or a 14-mg/kg suspension dose given to children (6 months to 12

years). No accumulation after multiple dosing.

Cefepime a

— 80 16-19 1.8 (1.7-2.5) b 0.26 (0.24-0.31) d 2.1 (1.3-2.4) b — 65 ± 7 μg/mL e

b RD c

a RD c

a

Data from healthy adult patients. Available only in parenteral form. b Median (range) of

reported CL and t 1/2

values from 16 single-dose studies. c Mild renal impairment. d Median

(range) of reported V ss

from 6 single-dose studies. e Following a 1-g IV dose.

Ceftazidime

References: Guay DR. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of cefdinir, an oral extended

spectrum cephalosporin. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2000, 19:S141–S146. PDR58, 2004, p. 503.

Tomino Y, et al. Pharmacokinetics of cefdinir and its transfer to dialysate in patients with

chronic renal failure undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Arzneimittelforschung, 1998, 48:862–867.

References: Okamoto MP, et al. Cefepime clinical pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet,

1993, 25:88–102. Rybak M. The pharmacokinetic profile of a new generation of parenteral

cephalosporin. Am J Med, 1996, 100:39S–44S.

— 84 ± 4 21 ± 6 CL = 1.05CL cr

+ 0.12 0.23 ± 0.02 1.6 ± 0.1 IM: 0.7-1.3 a IV: 119-146 μg/mL a

IM: 91 i CF i CF, Burn i RD, CF a RD, Prem, Neo, IM: 29-39 μg/mL a

a Aged, Burn Aged

i CF

a

Range of mean data from different studies following a 1-g bolus IV or IM dose given to

healthy adults.

Reference: Balant L, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of the third generation cephalosporins.

Clin Pharmacokinet, 1985, 10:101–143.

(Continued)

APPENDIX II

DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF DOSAGE REGIMENS: PHARMACOKINETIC DATA

1911

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!