22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The precise sequence of events that leads from drug-induced

DNA damage to cell death has not been fully elucidated. In vitro,

camptothecin-induced DNA damage abolishes the activation of the

p34 cdc2 /cyclin B complex, leading to cell-cycle arrest at the G2 phase

(Tsao et al., 1993). Treatment with camptothecins can induce the

transcription of c-fos and c-jun early-response genes, and this occurs

in association with internucleosomal DNA fragmentation, a characteristic

of programmed cell death.

Mechanisms of Resistance. A variety of mechanisms of resistance to

topoisomerase I–targeted agents have been characterized in vitro,

although little is known about their significance in the clinical setting.

Decreased intracellular drug accumulation may underlie resistance in

cell lines. Topotecan, but not SN-38 or irinotecan, is a substrate for

P-glycoprotein. However, the clinical relevance of P-glycoproteinmediated

efflux as a mechanism of resistance against topotecan

remains unclear, as the magnitude of the effect in preclinical studies

was found to be substantially lower than that observed with other

MDR substrates, such as etoposide or doxorubicin. Other reports have

associated topotecan and irinotecan resistance with the MRP class of

transporters (Miyake et al., 1999). Cell lines that lack carboxylesterase

activity demonstrate resistance to irinotecan (Van Ark-Otte et al.,

1998), but in patients, the liver and red blood cells may have sufficient

carboxylesterase activity to convert irinotecan to SN-38. Camptothecin

resistance also may result from decreased expression or mutation of

topoisomerase I. Although a good correlation has been found in certain

tumor cell lines between sensitivity to camptothecin analogs and

topoisomerase I levels (Sugimoto et al., 1990), clinical studies have not

confirmed this association. Chromosomal deletions or hypermethylation

of the topoisomerase I gene are possible mechanisms of decreased

topoisomerase I expression in resistant cells. A transient downregulation

of topoisomerase I has been demonstrated following prolonged

exposure to camptothecins in vitro and in vivo. Mutations leading to

reduced topoisomerase I enzyme catalytic activity or DNA-binding

affinity have been associated with experimental camptothecin resistance

(Tamura et al., 1991). In addition, enzyme phosphorylation or

polyADP ribosylation may reduce the activity of topoisomerase I and

its susceptibility to inhibition. Finally, exposure of cells to topoisomerase

I–targeted agents upregulates topoisomerase II, an alternative

enzyme for DNA strand passage.

Very little is known about how the cell deals with the stabilized

DNA-topoisomerase complexes. Cellular repair processes may

not readily recognize the drug-enzyme-DNA complex. However, an

enzyme with specific tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase activity may

be involved in the disassembly of topoisomerase I–DNA complexes

(Yang et al., 1996).

Absorption, Fate, and Excretion

Topotecan. Topotecan is approved for intravenous administration.

However, there has been interest in developing an oral dosage form

for the drug, which has a bioavailability of 30-40% in cancer

patients. Topotecan exhibits linear pharmacokinetics, and it is rapidly

eliminated from systemic circulation. The biological t 1/2

of total

topotecan, which ranges from 3.5-4.1 hours, is relatively short compared

to that of other camptothecins. Only 20-35% of the total drug

in plasma is found to be in the active lactone form. Within 24 hours,

30-40% of the administered dose appears in the urine. Doses should

be reduced in proportion to reductions in CrCl. Although several

oxidative metabolites have been identified, hepatic metabolism

appears to be a relatively minor route of drug elimination. Unlike

most other camptothecins considered for clinical development,

plasma protein binding of topotecan is low, at only 7-35%, which

may explain its relatively greater CNS penetration.

Irinotecan. The conversion of irinotecan to SN-38 is mediated predominantly

by carboxylesterases in the liver. Although SN-38 can

be measured in plasma shortly after beginning an intravenous infusion

of irinotecan, the AUC of SN-38 is only ~4% of the AUC of

irinotecan, suggesting that only a relatively small fraction of the dose

is ultimately converted to the active form of the drug. Irinotecan

exhibits linear pharmacokinetics at doses evaluated in cancer

patients. In comparison to topotecan, a relatively large fraction of

both irinotecan and SN-38 are present in plasma as the biologically

active intact lactone form. Another potential advantage of this analog

is that the t 1/2

of SN-38 is 11.5 hours, which is much longer than

the t 1/2

of topotecan. CSF penetration of SN-38 in humans has not

been characterized yet, although in rhesus monkeys, it is only 14%,

significantly lower than that observed for topotecan.

In contrast to topotecan, hepatic metabolism represents an

important route of elimination for both irinotecan and SN-38.

Oxidative metabolites have been identified in plasma, all of which

result from CYP3A-mediated reactions directed at the bispiperidine

side chain. These metabolites are not significantly converted to SN-

38. The total body clearance of irinotecan was found to be two times

greater in brain cancer patients taking antiseizure drugs that induce

hepatic CYPs, further attesting to the importance of oxidative

hepatic metabolism as a route of elimination for this drug (Gilbert

et al., 2003).

Glucuronidation of the hydroxyl group at position C10

(resulting from cleavage of the bispiperidine promoiety) produces

the only known metabolite of SN-38. Biliary excretion appears to

be the primary elimination route of irinotecan, SN-38, and their

metabolites, although urinary excretion also contributes significantly

(14-37%). Uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1

(UGT1A1), converts SN-38 to its inactive derivative (Iyer et al.,

1998). The extent of SN-38 glucuronidation inversely correlates with

the risk of severe diarrhea after irinotecan therapy. UGT1A1 also

glucuronidates bilirubin. Polymorphisms of this enzyme are associated

with familial hyperbilirubinemia syndromes such as Crigler-

Najjar syndrome and Gilbert syndrome. Crigler-Najjar syndrome is

rare (one in a million births), but Gilbert syndrome occurs in up to

15% of the general population and results in a mild hyperbilirubinemia

that may be clinically silent. The presence of UGT enzyme polymorphisms

may have a major impact on the clinical use of

irinotecan. A positive correlation has been found between baseline

serum unconjugated bilirubin concentration and both severity of neutropenia

and the AUC of irinotecan and SN-38 in patients treated

with irinotecan. Moreover, severe irinotecan toxicity has been

observed in cancer patients with Gilbert syndrome, presumably due

to decreased glucuronidation of SN-38. The presence of bacterial

glucuronidase in the intestinal lumen potentially can contribute to

irinotecan’s GI toxicity by releasing unconjugated SN-38 from the

inactive glucuronide metabolite excreted in the bile.

Therapeutic Uses

Topotecan. Topotecan (HYCAMTIN) is indicated for previously treated

patients with ovarian and small cell lung cancer. Its significant hematological

toxicity has limited its use in combination with other active

agents in these diseases (e.g., cisplatin).

1711

CHAPTER 61

CYTOTOXIC AGENTS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!