22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1188 events in women without other predisposing factors is low (e.g.,

roughly half that associated with the risk of venous thromboembolism

in pregnancy). Nevertheless, the risk is significantly increased

in women who smoke or have other factors that predispose to thrombosis

or thromboembolism (Castelli, 1999). Of note, postmarketing

epidemiologic studies indicate that women using transdermal contraceptives

have a higher than expected exposure to estrogen and are at

increased risk for the development of venous thromboembolism.

Early high-dose combination oral contraceptives caused hypertension

in 4-5% of normotensive women and increased blood pressure

in 10-15% of those with preexisting hypertension. This incidence is

much lower with newer low-dose preparations, and most reported

changes in blood pressure are not significant. The cardiovascular risk

associated with oral contraceptive use does not appear to persist after

use is discontinued. As noted previously, estrogens increase serum

HDL and decrease LDL levels, and progestins tend to have the opposite

effect. Recent studies of several low-dose preparations have not

found significant changes in total serum cholesterol or lipoprotein

profiles, although slight increases in triglycerides have been

reported.

Cancer. Given the growth-promoting effects of estrogens, there has

been a long-standing concern that oral contraceptives might increase

the incidence of endometrial, cervical, ovarian, breast, and other cancers.

These concerns were further heightened in the late 1960s by

reports of endometrial changes caused by sequential oral contraceptives,

which have since been removed from the market in the U.S.

However, it is now clear that there is not a widespread association

between oral contraceptive use and cancer (Burkman et al., 2004;

Westhoff, 1999).

Epidemiological evidence suggests that combined oral contraceptive

use may increase the risk of cervical cancer by about 2-

fold but only in long-term users (>5 years) with persistent human

papilloma virus infection (Moodley, 2004).

There have been reports of increases in the incidence of

hepatic adenoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in oral contraceptive

users. Current estimates indicate there is about a doubling in the risk

of liver cancer after 4-8 years of use. However, these are rare cancers,

and the absolute increases are small.

The major present concern about the carcinogenic effects of

oral contraceptives is focused on breast cancer. Numerous studies have

dealt with this issue, and the following general picture has emerged.

The risk of breast cancer in women of childbearing age is very low,

and current oral contraceptive users in this group have only a very

small increase in relative risk of 1.1-1.2, depending on other variables.

This small increase is not substantially affected by duration of use,

dose or type of component, age at first use, or parity. Importantly, 10 years

after discontinuation of oral contraceptive use, there is no difference

in breast cancer incidence between past users and never users. In addition,

breast cancers diagnosed in women who have ever used oral contraceptives

are more likely to be localized to the breast and thus easier

to treat (i.e., are less likely to have spread to other sites) (Westhoff,

1999). Thus overall there is no significant difference in the cumulative

risk of breast cancer between those who have ever used oral contraceptives

and those who have never used them.

Combination oral contraceptives do not increase the incidence

of endometrial cancer but actually cause a 50% decrease in the

incidence of this disease, which lasts 15 years after the pills are

SECTION V

HORMONES AND HORMONE ANTAGONISTS

stopped. This is thought to be due to the inclusion of a progestin,

which opposes estrogen-induced proliferation, throughout the entire

21-day cycle of administration. These agents also decrease the incidence

of ovarian cancer, and decreased ovarian stimulation by

gonadotropins provides a logical basis for this effect. There are accumulating

data that oral contraceptive use decreases the risk of colorectal

cancer (Fernandez et al., 2001).

Metabolic and Endocrine Effects. The effects of sex steroids on glucose

metabolism and insulin sensitivity are complex (Godsland,

1996) and may differ among agents in the same class (e.g., the 19-nor

progestins). Early studies with high-dose oral contraceptives generally

reported impaired glucose tolerance as demonstrated by

increases in fasting glucose and insulin levels and responses to glucose

challenge. These effects have decreased as steroid dosages have

been lowered, and current low-dose combination contraceptives may

even improve insulin sensitivity. Similarly, the high-dose progestins

in early oral contraceptives did raise LDL and reduce HDL levels,

but modern low-dose preparations do not produce unfavorable lipid

profiles (Sherif, 1999). There also have been periodic reports that

oral contraceptives increase the incidence of gallbladder disease, but

any such effect appears to be weak and limited to current or very

long-term users (Burkman et al., 2004).

The estrogenic component of oral contraceptives may

increase hepatic synthesis of a number of serum proteins, including

those that bind thyroid hormones, glucocorticoids, and sex

steroids. Although physiological feedback mechanisms generally

adjust hormone synthesis to maintain normal “free” hormone levels,

these changes can affect the interpretation of endocrine function

tests that measure total plasma hormone levels, and may

necessitate dose adjustment in patients receiving thyroid-hormone

replacement.

The ethinyl estradiol present in oral contraceptives appears

to cause a dose-dependent increase in several serum factors known

to increase coagulation. However, in healthy women who do not

smoke, there also is an increase in fibrinolytic activity, which exerts

a counter effect so that overall there is a minimal effect on hemostatic

balance. In women who smoke, however, this compensatory

effect is diminished, which may shift the hemostatic profile toward

a hypercoagulable condition (Fruzzetti, 1999).

Miscellaneous Effects. Nausea, edema, and mild headache occur in

some individuals, and more severe migraine headaches may be

precipitated by oral contraceptive use in a smaller fraction of women.

Some patients may experience breakthrough bleeding during the 21-

day cycle when the active pills are being taken. Withdrawal bleeding

may fail to occur in a small fraction of women during the 7-day

“off” period, thus causing confusion about a possible pregnancy.

Acne and hirsutism are thought to be mediated by the androgenic

activity of the 19-nor progestins.

Progestin-Only Contraceptives. Episodes of irregular,

unpredictable spotting and breakthrough bleeding are

the most frequently encountered untoward effect and

the major reason women discontinue use of all three

types of progestin-only contraceptives. With time, the

incidence of these bleeding episodes decreases, especially

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!