22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

efavirenz and nevirapine, and any patient who fails treatment with

this NNRTI should not be treated with those drugs.

Delavirdine is well absorbed, especially at pH<2. Antacids,

histamine H 2

-receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, and

achlorhydria may decrease its absorption. Standard meals do not

alter the delavirdine AUC, and the drug can be administered irrespective

of food. The drug may have nonlinear pharmacokinetics

because the plasma t 1/2

increases with increasing doses (Scott and

Perry, 2000). Delavirdine clearance is primarily through oxidative

metabolism by CYP3A4, with <5% of a dose recovered unchanged

in the urine. At the recommended dose of 400 mg three times daily,

the mean elimination t 1/2

is 5.8 hours (range: 2-11 hours because of

the considerable interpatient variability in clearance).

As with all drugs in this class, the most common side effect

of delavirdine is rash, which occurs in 18-36% of subjects. Rash

usually is seen in the first few weeks of treatment and often

resolves despite continued therapy. Severe dermatitis, including

erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson syndrome, has been

reported but is rare. Elevated hepatic transaminases and hepatic

failure also have been reported. Neutropenia also may occur rarely

(Scott and Perry, 2000).

Delavirdine is both a substrate for and an inhibitor of

CYP3A4 and can alter the metabolism of other CYP3A4 substrates.

Potent inducers of CYP3A4, such as carbamazepine, phenobarbital,

phenytoin, rifabutin, and rifampin, may decrease delavirdine concentrations

and should be avoided. Delavirdine increases the

plasma concentrations of most HIV protease inhibitors (Scott and

Perry, 2000).

Initial monotherapy studies with delavirdine produced only

transient decreases in plasma HIV RNA concentrations owing to

rapid emergence of resistance. Later studies of delavirdine in combination

with nucleoside analogs showed sustained decreases in

HIV-1 RNA.

HIV PROTEASE INHIBITORS

HIV protease inhibitors are peptide-like chemicals

that competitively inhibit the action of the virus

aspartyl protease (Figure 59–5). This protease is a

homodimer consisting of two 99-amino acid

monomers; each monomer contributes an aspartic acid

residue that is essential for catalysis (Flexner, 1998).

The preferred cleavage site for this enzyme is the N-

terminal side of proline residues, especially between

phenylalanine and proline. Human aspartyl proteases

(i.e., renin, pepsin, gastricsin, and cathepsins D and

E) contain only one polypeptide chain and are not significantly

inhibited by HIV protease inhibitors.

These drugs prevent proteolytic cleavage of HIV gag and pol

precursor polypeptides that include essential structural (p17, p24,

p9, and p7) and enzymatic (reverse transcriptase, protease, and integrase)

components of the virus. This prevents the metamorphosis of

HIV virus particles into their mature infectious form (Flexner, 1998).

Infected patients treated with HIV protease inhibitors as sole agents

experienced a 100- to 1000-fold mean decrease in plasma HIV RNA

concentrations within 12 weeks, an effect similar in magnitude to

that produced by NNRTIs (Ho et al., 1995).

The pharmacokinetic properties of HIV protease

inhibitors are characterized by high interindividual variability,

which may reflect differential activity of intestinal

and hepatic CYPs (Flexner, 1998). Clearance is

mainly through hepatic oxidative metabolism. All

except nelfinavir are metabolized predominantly by

CYP3A4 (and nelfinavir’s major metabolite is cleared

by CYP3A4). Elimination half-lives of the HIV protease

inhibitors range from 1.8 to 10 hours (Table 59–4), and

most of these drugs can be dosed once or twice daily.

Most HIV protease inhibitors are highly protein bound

in plasma, and adding plasma proteins will increase their

in vitro IC 50

(Molla et al., 1998). Fractional penetration

into the CSF is also low for most of these agents,

although the clinical significance is unknown.

An important toxicity common to all approved

HIV protease inhibitors is the potential for metabolic

drug interactions. Most of these drugs inhibit CYP3A4

at clinically achieved concentrations, although the magnitude

of inhibition varies greatly, with ritonavir by far

the most potent (Piscitelli and Gallicano, 2001). It is

now a common practice to combine HIV protease

inhibitors with a low dose of ritonavir to take advantage

of that drug’s remarkable capacity to inhibit

CYP3A4 metabolism (Flexner, 2000).

Although the approved dose of ritonavir for antiretroviral

treatment is 600 mg twice daily, doses of 100 or 200 mg once or

twice daily are sufficient to inhibit CYP3A4 and increase (“boost”)

the concentrations of most concurrently administered CYP3A4 substrates.

Lower doses of ritonavir are much better tolerated. The

enhanced pharmacokinetic profile of HIV protease inhibitors administered

with ritonavir reflects inhibition of both first-pass and systemic

clearance, resulting in improved oral bioavailability and a

longer elimination t 1/2

of the co-administered drug. This allows a

reduction in both drug dose and dosing frequency while increasing

systemic concentrations (Flexner, 2000). Combinations of darunavir,

lopinavir, fosamprenavir, and atazanavir with ritonavir are approved

for once-daily administration.

Most HIV protease inhibitors are substrates for

the P-glycoprotein efflux pump (P-gp) (Chapter 5).

P-gp in capillary endothelial cells of the blood-brain barrier

limits the penetration of HIV protease inhibitors into the brain

(Kim et al., 1998), although the low CSF-to-plasma drug concentration

ratio characteristic of these drugs also may reflect extensive

binding to plasma proteins. Most HIV protease inhibitors

penetrate less well into semen than do nucleoside reverse transcriptase

inhibitors and NNRTIs. Virologic responses in plasma, CSF,

and semen usually are concordant (Taylor et al., 1999), and the

clinical significance of P-gp and protein-binding effects is unclear.

1645

CHAPTER 59

ANTIRETROVIRAL AGENTS AND TREATMENT OF HIV INFECTION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!