22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

436 Absorption for most agents is quite high, and concurrent

administration of anticholinergic anti-parkinsonian agents does not

appreciably diminish intestinal absorption. Most orally-disintegrating

tablets (ODT) and liquid preparations provide similar pharmacokinetics

since there is little mucosal absorption and effects depend on

swallowed drug. Asenapine remains the only exception. It is only

available as an ODT preparation administered sublingually, and all

absorption occurs via oral mucosa, with bioavailability of 35% by

this route. If swallowed, the first pass effect is > 98%, indicating that

drug swallowed with oral secretions is not bioavailable.

Intramuscular administration avoids much of the first-pass enteric

metabolism and provides measurable concentrations in plasma

within 15-30 minutes. Most agents are highly protein bound, but this

protein binding may include glycoprotein sites. Kinetic studies indicate

that antipsychotic drugs do not significantly displace other prealbumin-

or albumin-bound medications. Antipsychotic medications

are predominantly highly lipophilic with apparent volumes of distribution

as high as 20 L/kg.

SECTION II

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY

Therapeutic Uses

The use of antipsychotic medications for the treatment

of schizophrenia spectrum disorders, for mania treatment,

and as adjunctive use for treatment-resistant major

depression has been discussed previously. Antipsychotic

agents are also utilized in several nonpsychotic neurological

disorders and as antiemetics.

Anxiety Disorders. There are two anxiety disorders in which double-blind,

placebo-controlled trials have shown benefit of adjunctive

treatment with antipsychotic drugs: obsessive compulsive disorder

(OCD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). While SSRI antidepressants

remain the only psychotropic medication with FDA

approval for PTSD treatment, adjunctive low-dose quetiapine, olanzapine,

and particularly risperidone significantly reduce the overall

level of symptoms in SSRI-resistant PTSD (Bartzokis et al., 2005).

OCD patients with limited response to the standard 12-week regimen

of high dose SSRI also benefit from adjunctive risperidone (mean

dose 2.2 mg), even in the presence of comorbid tic disorders

(McDougle et al., 2000). For generalized anxiety disorder, doubleblind

placebo controlled clinical trials demonstrate efficacy for quetiapine

as monotherapy, and for adjunctive low-dose risperidone.

Tourette’s Disorder. The ability of antipsychotic drugs to suppress

tics in patients with Tourette’s disorder has been known for decades,

and relates to reduced D 2

neurotransmission in basal ganglia sites. In

prior decades, the use of low-dose, high-potency typical antipsychotic

agents (e.g., haloperidol, pimozide) was the treatment of

choice, but these nonpsychotic patients were extremely sensitive to

the impact of DA blockade on cognitive processing speed, and on

reward centers. Safety concerns regarding pimozide’s QTc prolongation

and increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias have large

ended its clinical use. While lacking FDA approval for tic disorders,

risperidone and aripiprazole have indications for child and adolescent

schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (acute mania) treatment, and

these agents (as well as ziprasidone) have published data supporting

their use for tic suppression. Given the enormous sensitivity of

preadolescent and teenage patients to antipsychotic-induced weight

gain, aripiprazole has an advantage in this patient population due to

somewhat lower risk for weight gain, and low risk for hyperprolactinemia

or concerns over QTc effects.

Huntington’s Disease. Huntington’s disease is another neuropsychiatric

condition, which, like tic disorders, is associated with basal

ganglia pathology. DA blockade can suppress the severity of

choreoathetotic movements, but is not strongly endorsed due to the

risks associated of excessive DA antagonism that outweigh the marginal

benefit. Inhibition of the vesicular monoamine transporter type 2

(VMAT2) with tetrabenazine has replaced DA receptor blockade in

the management of chorea (Chapter 22).

Autism. Autism is a disease whose neuropathology is incompletely

understood, but in some patients is associated with explosive behavioral

outbursts, and aggressive or self-injurious behaviors that may

be stereotypical. Risperidone has FDA approval for irritability associated

with autism in child and adolescent patients ages 5-16, with

common use for disruptive behavior problems in autism and other

forms of mental retardation. Initial risperidone daily doses are

0.25 mg for patients weighing < 20 kg, and 0.5 mg for others, with

a target dose of 0.5 mg/day in those < 20 kg weight, and 1.0 mg/day

for other patients, with a range 0.5-3.0 mg/day.

Anti-emetic Use. Most antipsychotic drugs protect against the

nausea- and emesis-inducing effects of DA agonists such as apomorphine

that act at central DA receptors in the chemoreceptor trigger

zone of the medulla. Antipsychotic drugs are effective

antiemetics already at low doses. Drugs or other stimuli that cause

emesis by an action on the nodose ganglion, or locally on the GI

tract, are not antagonized by antipsychotic drugs, but potent piperazines

and butyrophenones are sometimes effective against nausea

caused by vestibular stimulation. The commonly used antiemetic

phenothiazines are weak DA antagonists (e.g., prochlorperazine)

without antipsychotic activity, but can be associated with EPS or

akathisia.

Adverse Effects and Drug Interactions

Adverse Effects Predicted by Monoamine

Receptor Affinities

Dopamine D 2

Receptor. With the exception of the D 2

partial

agonist aripiprazole (and the commercially unavailable

agent bifeprunox), all other antipsychotic agents

possess D 2

antagonist properties, the strength of which

determines the likelihood for EPS, akathisia, long-term

tardive dyskinesia risk, and hyperprolactinemia. The

manifestations of EPS are described in Table 16-4,

along with the usual treatment approach. Acute dystonic

reactions occur in the early hours and days of

treatment with highest risk among younger patients

(peak incidence ages 10-19), especially antipsychoticnaïve

individuals, in response to abrupt decreases in

nigrostriatal D 2

neurotransmission. The dystonia typically

involves head and neck muscles, the tongue, and

in its severest form, the oculogyric crisis, extraocular

muscles, and is very frightening to the patient.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!