22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54

A. Activation by Ligand Binding of GPCR

Basal

L

Active

L

SECTION I

GENERAL PRINCIPLES

α

GDP

β

γ

GDP

Ligand binding stimulates

GDP release; GTP binds to α

PO 4

RGS

GTP

Active α-GTP returns to basal state,

by RGS proteins

α

GTP

β

γ

Modulation

of effectors

B. Modulation of Effectors

by βγ

by phosphorylation

and scaffold proteins

L

by α-GTP

Effector

γ

β

β

γ

—PO 4

α

GTP

Effector

PI3 K

K + channel

Ca 2+ channel

GRKs

Arrestin

AC (G s )

AC (G i )

PLC (G q )

Figure 3–8. Diagram showing the stimulation of a G–protein coupled receptor by ligand, the activation of the G protein, and stimulation

of selected effectors. Schematic diagram of the mechanisms involved in the control of cell function by G–protein coupled receptors,

G proteins, and effectors. In the absence of ligand, the receptor and G protein heterotrimer form a complex in the membrane with

the Gα subunit bound to GDP. Following binding of ligand, the receptor and G protein α subunit undergo a conformational change

leading to release of GDP, binding of GTP, and dissociation of the complex. The activated GTP-bound Gα subunit and the freed βγ

dimer bind to and regulate effectors. The system is returned to the basal state by hydrolysis of the GTP on the α subunit; a reaction

that is markedly enhanced by the RGS proteins. Prolonged stimulation of the receptor can lead to down-regulation of the receptor.

This event is initiated by G protein receptor kinases (GRKs) that phosphorylate the C terminal tail of the receptor, leading to recruitment

of proteins termed arrestins; arrestins bind to the receptor on the internal surface, displacing G proteins and inhibiting signaling.

Detailed descriptions of these signaling pathways are given throughout the text in relation to the therapeutic actions of drugs

affecting these pathways.

patterns of selectivity among agonist or antagonist ligands.

When selective ligands are not known, the receptors

are more commonly referred to as isoforms rather

than as subtypes. The distinction between classes and

subtypes of receptors, however, is often arbitrary or historical.

The α 1

, α 2

, and β adrenergic receptors differ

from each other both in ligand selectivity and in coupling

to G proteins (G q

, G i

, and G s

, respectively), yet α and

β are considered receptor classes and α 1

and α 2

are considered

subtypes. The α 1A

, α 1B

, and α 1C

receptor isoforms

differ little in their biochemical properties,

although their tissue distributions are distinct. The β 1

,

β 2

, and β 3

adrenergic receptor subtypes exhibit differences

in both tissue distribution and regulation by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!