22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 36–3

Side Effects of Theophylline and Mechanisms

SIDE EFFECT

PROPOSED MECHANISM

Nausea and vomiting PDE4 inhibition

Headaches

PDE4 inhibition

Gastric discomfort

PDE4 inhibition

Diuresis

A 1

receptor antagonism

Behavioral disturbance (?) ?

Cardiac arrhythmias PDE3 inhibition,

A 1

receptor antagonism

Epileptic seizures

A 1

receptor antagonism

PDE, phosphodiesterase; A, adenosine.

routine monitoring of plasma concentrations is usually not

necessary, unless a change in clearance is suspected or evidence

of toxicity emerges.

Clinical Use. In patients with acute asthma, intravenous aminophylline

is less effective than nebulized 2

agonists and should therefore

be reserved for those patients who fail to respond to, or are

intolerant of, agonists. Theophylline should not be added routinely

to nebulized 2

agonists because it does not increase the bronchodilator

response and may increase their side effects (Parameswaran

et al., 2000). Indeed, the role of theophylline in the contemporary management

of asthma and COPD has been questioned. However, there is

good evidence that theophylline may provide an additional bronchodilator

effect even when maximally effective doses of 2

agonist

have been given (Rivington et al., 1995). Thus, if adequate bronchodilation

is not achieved by a agonist alone, theophylline may

be added to the maintenance therapy with benefit. Addition of lowdose

theophylline to either a high or low dose of ICS in patients who

are not adequately controlled provides better symptom control and

lung function than doubling the dose of inhaled steroid (Evans et al.,

1997; Lim et al., 2000; Ukena et al., 1997), although it is less effective

as an add-on therapy than a LABA (Wilson et al., 2000).

Theophylline may be useful in patients with nocturnal asthma

because slow-release preparations are able to provide therapeutic

concentrations overnight, although it is less effective than a LABA

(Shah et al., 2003). Studies have also documented the steroidsparing

effects of theophylline. Although theophylline is less effective

than a 2

agonist and corticosteroids, a minority of asthmatic patients

appears to derive unexpected benefit; even patients on oral steroids

may show a deterioration in lung function when theophylline is

withdrawn (Brenner et al., 1988; Kidney et al., 1995). Theophylline

has been used as a controller in the management of mild persistent

asthma, although it is usually found to be less effective than low doses

of inhaled corticosteroids (Seddon et al., 2006). Although LABA are

more effective as an add-on therapy, theophylline is considerably less

expensive and may be the only affordable add-on treatment when the

costs of medication are limiting (Bateman et al., 2008).

Theophylline is still used as a bronchodilator in COPD, but

inhaled anticholinergics and 2

agonists are preferred (Rabe et al.,

2007). Theophylline tends to be added to these inhaled bronchodilators

in more severe patients and has been shown to give additional clinical

improvement when added to a long-acting 2

agonist (Ram et

al., 2002). Intravenous aminophylline is less effective in treating

acute exacerbations than nebulized 2

agonists and has a much

higher incidence of adverse effects (Barr et al., 2003; Duffy et al.,

2005). As in asthmatics, patients with severe COPD deteriorate when

theophylline is withdrawn from their treatment regimen. A theoretical

advantage of theophylline is that it its systemic administration

may have effects on small airways, resulting in reduction of hyperinflation

and thus a reduction in dyspnea.

Side Effects. Unwanted effects of theophylline are usually related to

plasma concentration and tend to occur at C p

> 15 mg/L. However,

many patients develop side effects even at low plasma concentrations.

To some extent, side effects may be reduced by gradually increasing the

dose until therapeutic concentrations are achieved. The most common

side effects are headache, nausea, and vomiting (due to inhibition of

PDE4), abdominal discomfort, and restlessness (Table 36–3). There

may also be increased acid secretion (due to PDE inhibition) and diuresis

(due to inhibition of adenosine A 1

receptors). Theophylline may

lead to behavioral disturbance and learning difficulties in schoolchildren,

although it is difficult to design adequate controls for such studies.

At high concentrations, cardiac arrhythmias may occur as a consequence

of inhibition of cardiac PDE3 inhibition and antagonism of cardiac

A 1

receptors. At very high concentrations, seizures may occur due

to central A 1

receptor antagonism. Use of low doses of theophylline, targeting

plasma concentrations of 5-10 mg/L, largely avoids side effects

and drug interactions and makes it less necessary to monitor plasma

concentrations (unless checking for compliance).

Summary and Future Developments

Theophylline use has been declining, partly because of

the problems with side effects, but mainly because more

effective therapy with ICS has been introduced. Oral

theophylline remains a useful treatment in some

patients with difficult asthma and appears to have

effects beyond those provided by steroids. Rapidrelease

theophylline preparations are the only affordable

anti-asthma medication in some developing countries.

There is increasing evidence that theophylline has

some anti-asthma effect at doses that are lower than

those needed for bronchodilation, and plasma levels of

5-15 mg/L are recommended.

Given theophylline’s anti-inflammatory effects,

there is a strong scientific rationale for combining lowdose

theophylline with ICS, particularly in patients with

more severe asthma and in COPD. Adding a low dose of

theophylline gives better control of asthma than doubling

the dose of ICS in uncontrolled patients, and is a less

expensive alternative add-on therapy than a LABA or

antileukotriene. Theophylline reverses corticosteroid

resistance in COPD cells by restoring HDAC2 to normal

levels (Cosio et al., 2004) and accelerates the recovery

from acute exacerbations of COPD through this mechanism

(Cosio et al., 2009). In COPD, low-dose theophylline

1043

CHAPTER 36

PULMONARY PHARMACOLOGY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!