22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1486 under controlled conditions, it has become clear that penicillin is

highly effective in some situations, useless and potentially dangerous

in others, and of questionable value in still others (Chapter 48).

SECTION VII

CHEMOTHERAPY OF MICROBIAL DISEASES

Streptococcal Infections. The administration of penicillin to individuals

exposed to S. pyogenes affords protection from infection.

The oral ingestion of 200,000 units of penicillin G or penicillin V

twice a day or a single injection of 1.2 million units of penicillin G

benzathine is effective. Indications for this type of prophylaxis

include outbreaks of streptococcal disease in closed populations,

such as boarding schools or military bases. Patients with extensive

deep burns are at high risk of severe wound infections with S. pyogenes;

“low-dose” prophylaxis for several days appears to be effective

in reducing the incidence of this complication.

Recurrences of Rheumatic Fever. The oral administration of 200,000

units of penicillin G or penicillin V every 12 hours produces a striking

decrease in the incidence of recurrences of rheumatic fever in susceptible

individuals. Because of the difficulties of compliance,

parenteral administration is preferable, especially in children. The

intramuscular injection of 1.2 million units of penicillin G benzathine

once a month yields excellent results. In cases of hypersensitivity to

penicillin, sulfisoxazole or sulfadiazine, 1 g twice a day for adults,

also is effective; for children weighing <27 kg, the dose is halved.

Prophylaxis must be continued throughout the year. The duration of

such treatment is an unsettled question. It has been suggested that

prophylaxis should be continued for life because instances of acute

rheumatic fever have been observed in the fifth and sixth decades.

However, the necessity for such prolonged prophylaxis has not been

established and may be unnecessary for young adults judged to be at

low risk for recurrence (Berrios et al., 1993).

Syphilis. Prophylaxis for a contact with syphilis consists of a

course of therapy as described for primary syphilis. A serological

test for syphilis should be performed at monthly intervals for at least

4 months thereafter.

Surgical Procedures in Patients with Valvular Heart Disease. About

25% of cases of subacute bacterial endocarditis follow dental extractions.

This observation, together with the fact that up to 80% of persons

who have teeth removed experience a transient bacteremia,

emphasizes the potential importance of chemoprophylaxis for those

who have congenital or acquired valvular heart disease of any type

and need to undergo dental procedures. Since transient bacterial

invasion of the bloodstream occurs occasionally after surgical procedures

(e.g., tonsillectomy and genitourinary and GI procedures)

and during childbirth, these, too, are indications for prophylaxis in

patients with valvular heart disease. Whether the incidence of bacterial

endocarditis actually is altered by this type of chemoprophylaxis

remains to be determined.

Detailed recommendations for adults and children with

valvular heart disease have been formulated (Wilson et al., 2007).

The Penicillinase-Resistant Penicillins

The penicillins described in this section are resistant to

hydrolysis by staphylococcal penicillinase. Their appropriate

use should be restricted to the treatment of infections

that are known or suspected to be caused by

staphylococci that elaborate the enzyme, which now

includes the vast majority of strains of this bacterium

that are encountered clinically. These drugs are much

less active than penicillin G against other penicillinsensitive

microorganisms, including non-penicillinaseproducing

staphylococci.

The role of the penicillinase-resistant penicillins

as the agents of choice for most staphylococcal disease

is changing with the increasing incidence of isolates of

so-called methicillin-resistant microorganisms. As commonly

used, this term denotes resistance of these bacteria

to all the penicillinase-resistant penicillins and

cephalosporins. Hospital-acquired strains usually are

resistant to the aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, erythromycin,

and clindamycin as well. Vancomycin is considered

the drug of choice for such infections, although

intermediate-level resistance is emerging (Centers for

Disease Control and Prevention, 2004). Some physicians

use a combination of vancomycin and rifampin,

especially for life-threatening infections and those involving

foreign bodies. Community-acquired methicillinresistant

strains are less likely to be resistant to other

classes of antibiotics with the exception of macrolides

(Okuma et al., 2002). MRSA contains an additional

high-molecular-weight PBP with a very low affinity

for β-lactam antibiotics (Spratt, 1994). From 40-60% of

strains of S. epidermidis also are resistant to the penicillinase-resistant

penicillins by the same mechanism.

As with MRSA, these strains may appear to be susceptible

to cephalosporins on disk-sensitivity testing, but

there usually is a significant population of microbes that

is resistant to cephalosporins and emerges during such

therapy. Vancomycin also is the drug of choice for serious

infection caused by methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis;

rifampin is given concurrently when a foreign

body is involved.

The Isoxazolyl Penicillins: Oxacillin, Cloxacillin, and

Dicloxacillin. These three congeneric semisynthetic penicillins

are similar pharmacologically and thus conveniently

are considered together. Their structural formulas

are shown in Table 53–1. All are relatively stable in an

acidic medium and absorbed adequately after oral administration.

All are markedly resistant to cleavage by penicillinase.

These drugs are not substitutes for penicillin G

in the treatment of diseases amenable to it, and they are

not active against enterococci or Listeria. Furthermore,

because of variability in intestinal absorption, oral administration

is not a substitute for the parenteral route in the

treatment of serious staphylococcal infections that require

a penicillin unaffected by penicillinase.

Pharmacological Properties. The isoxazolyl penicillins are potent

inhibitors of the growth of most penicillinase-producing staphylococci.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!