22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1072 estimated as ~17% based on a meta-analysis of nearly 14,000 cancer

patients (Bohlius et al., 2008). The cause(s) of this effect is

presently unclear, but some studies suggest that tumor cells bearing

the erythropoietin receptor are more likely to be affected by the use

of ESAs (Henke et al., 2003). Although epoetin alfa is not associated

with direct pressor effects, blood pressure may rise, especially during

the early phases of therapy when the hematocrit is increasing.

ESAs should not be used in patients with preexisting uncontrolled

hypertension. Patients may require initiation of, or increases in, antihypertensive

therapy. Hypertensive encephalopathy and seizures

have occurred in chronic renal failure patients treated with epoetin

alfa. The incidence of seizures appears to be higher during the first

90 days of therapy with epoetin alfa in patients on dialysis (occurring

in ~2.5% of patients) when compared with subsequent 90-day

periods. Headache, tachycardia, edema, shortness of breath, nausea,

vomiting, diarrhea, injection site stinging, and flu-like symptoms

(e.g., arthralgias and myalgias) also have been reported in conjunction

with epoetin alfa therapy. Pure red-cell aplasia in association

with neutralizing antibodies to native erythropoietin has been

observed in patients treated with specific epoetin alfa formulations

(see earlier discussion). Resistance to therapy can be caused by multiple

factors (see following discussion).

SECTION IV

INFLAMMATION. IMMUNOMODULATION, AND HEMATOPOIESIS

Anemia of Chronic Renal Failure. Patients with anemia secondary to

chronic kidney disease are ideal candidates for epoetin alfa therapy

because the disorder represents a pure erythropoietin deficiency

state. The response in predialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and hemodialysis

patients depends on the severity of the renal failure, the erythropoietin

dose and route of administration, and iron availability

(Besarab et al., 1999, Kaufman et al., 1998). The subcutaneous route

of administration is preferred over the intravenous route because

absorption is slower and the amount of drug required is reduced

by 20-40%.

The dose of epoetin alfa should be adjusted to obtain a gradual

rise in the hematocrit over a 2- to 4-month period to a final hematocrit

of 33-36%. Treatment to hematocrit levels >36% is not

recommended because patients treated to a hematocrit >40% showed

a higher incidence of myocardial infarction and death (Besarab et

al., 1998). The drug should not be used to replace emergency transfusion

in patients who need immediate correction of a life-threatening

anemia.

Patients are started on doses of 80-120 units/kg of epoetin

alfa, given subcutaneously, three times a week. It can be given on a

once-weekly schedule, but somewhat more drug is required for an

equivalent effect. If the response is poor, the dose should be progressively

increased. The final maintenance dose of epoetin alfa can vary

from as little as 10 units/kg to >300 units/kg, with an average dose

of 75 units/kg, three times a week. Children <5 years of age generally

require a higher dose. Resistance to therapy is common in

patients who develop an inflammatory illness or become iron deficient,

so close monitoring of general health and iron status is essential.

Less common causes of resistance include occult blood loss,

folic acid deficiency, carnitine deficiency, inadequate dialysis,

aluminum toxicity, and osteitis fibrosa cystica secondary to

hyperparathyroidism.

The most common side effect of epoetin alfa therapy is aggravation

of hypertension, which occurs in 20-30% of patients and most

often is associated with a rapid rise in hematocrit. Blood pressure

usually can be controlled either by increasing antihypertensive therapy

or ultrafiltration in dialysis patients or by reducing the epoetin

alfa dose to slow the hematocrit response.

Darbepoetin alfa also is approved for use in patients who are

anemic secondary to chronic kidney disease. The recommended

starting dose is 0.45 μg/kg administered intravenously or subcutaneously

once weekly, with dose adjustments depending on the

response. Like epoetin alfa, side effects tend to occur when patients

experience a rapid rise in hemoglobin concentration; a rise of <1

g/dL every 2 weeks generally has been considered safe.

Anemia in AIDS Patients. Epoetin alfa therapy has been approved for

the treatment of HIV-infected patients, especially those on zidovudine

therapy (Fischl et al., 1990). Excellent responses to doses of

100-300 units/kg, given subcutaneously three times a week, generally

are seen in patients with zidovudine-induced anemia. In the face

of advanced disease, marrow damage, and elevated serum erythropoietin

levels (>500 IU/L), therapy is less effective.

Cancer-Related Anemias. Epoetin alfa therapy, 150 units/kg three

times a week or 450-600 units/kg once a week, can reduce the transfusion

requirement in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Evidence-based guidelines for the therapeutic use of recombinant

erythropoietin in patients with cancer have been published (Rizzo et

al., 2002). Briefly, the guidelines recommend the use of epoetin alfa

in patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia when hemoglobin

levels fall below 10 g/dL, basing the decision to treat less severe anemia

(Hb, 10-12 g/dL) on clinical circumstances. For anemia associated

with hematologic malignancies, the guidelines support the use

of recombinant erythropoietin in patients with low-grade myelodysplastic

syndrome, although the evidence that the drug is effective in

anemic patients with multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma,

or chronic lymphocytic leukemia not receiving chemotherapy is less

robust. A baseline serum erythropoietin level may help to predict the

response; most patients with blood levels >500 IU/L are unlikely to

respond to any dose of the drug. Most patients treated with epoetin

alfa experienced an improvement in their anemia, sense of wellbeing,

and quality of life (Littlewood et al., 2001). This improved

sense of well-being, particularly in cancer patients, may not be solely

due to the rise in the hematocrit. Erythropoietin receptors have been

demonstrated in cells of the central nervous system (CNS), and erythropoietin

has been found to act as a cytoprotectant in several models

of CNS ischemia. Thus high levels of the hormone may directly

affect cancer patients’ sense of well-being.

Darbepoetin alfa also has been tested in cancer patients undergoing

chemotherapy and preliminary studies appear promising.

However, recent case reports have suggested a direct effect of both

epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa in stimulation of tumor cells. For

example, patients with cancer of the head and neck randomized to

receive recombinant erythropoietin had a statistically significant

increase in likelihood of tumor progression during the duration of the

study (Henke et al., 2003). A meta-analysis of a large number of

patients and clinical trials estimates the risk at ~10% higher than nontreated

cancer patients (Bohlius et al., 2008). This finding is being

evaluated by the FDA and warrants serious attention.

Surgery and Autologous Blood Donation. Epoetin alfa has been used

perioperatively to treat anemia and reduce the need for erythrocyte

transfusion. Patients undergoing elective orthopedic and cardiac procedures

have been treated with 150-300 units/kg of epoetin alfa once

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!