22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

while they may be physically dependent, are not

“addicts” even though they may need large doses on a

regular basis. Physical dependence is not equivalent to

addiction (Chapter 24).

Most clinicians who are experienced in the management

of chronic pain associated with malignant disease

or terminal illness recommend that a baseline

long-acting opioid be administered around the clock so

that pain is continually under control and patients do

not dread its return (Foley, 1993). For breakthrough

pain episodes, a fast-onset, short-acting opioid can be

administered. Less drug is needed to prevent the recurrence

of pain than to relieve it initially. Morphine

remains the opioid of choice in most of these situations,

and the route and dose should be adjusted to the needs

of the individual patient. Oral morphine is adequate in

most situations. Sustained-release preparations of oral

morphine and oxycodone are available that can be

administered at 8-, 12-, or 24-hour intervals (morphine)

or 8- to 12-hour intervals (oxycodone); thus, superior

control of pain often can be achieved with fewer side

effects using the same daily dose; a decrease in the fluctuation

of plasma concentrations of morphine may be

partially responsible.

Constipation is an exceedingly common problem

when opioids are used, and the use of stool softeners

and laxatives should be initiated early; newer modalities

include the use of peripheral opiate antagonists such as

methylnaltrexone. Amphetamines have demonstrable

mood-elevating and analgesic effects, enhance opioidinduced

analgesia, and can reverse opioid induced sedation.

However, not all terminal patients require the

euphoriant effects of amphetamine, and some experience

side effects, such as anorexia. Controlled studies

demonstrate no superiority of oral heroin over oral morphine.

Similarly, after adjustment is made for potency,

parenteral heroin is not superior to morphine in terms of

analgesia, effects on mood, or side effects (Sawynok,

1986). Although tolerance does develop to oral opioids,

many patients obtain relief from the same dosage for

weeks or months. In cases where one opioid loses effectiveness,

switching to another may provide better pain

relief. “Cross-tolerance” among opioids exists, but clinically

and experimentally, cross-tolerance among

related receptor agonists is not complete. The reasons

for this are not clear but may relate to differences

between agonists in receptor-binding characteristics

and subsequent cellular signaling interactions.

When oral opioids and other analgesics are no

longer satisfactory, subcutaneous or intravenous opioids,

nerve blocks, or neurolysis may be required if the

nature of the disease permits. Epidural or intrathecal

administration of opioids may be useful when administration

of opioids by usual routes no longer yields adequate

relief of pain.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Acute Pain

Management in Infants, Children, and Adolescents: Operative

and Medical Procedures. No. 92-0020. U.S. Dept. of Health

and Human Services, Rockville, MD, 1992a.

Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Acute Pain

Management: Operative or Medical Procedures and Trauma.

No. 92-0032. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services,

Rockville, MD, 1992b.

Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Management of

Cancer Pain. No. 94-0592. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human

Services, Rockville, MD, 1994.

Akil H, Owens C, Gutstein H, et al. Endogenous opioids:

Overview and current issues. Drug Alcohol Depend, 1998,

51:127–140.

Akil H, Watson SJ, Young E, et al. Endogenous opioids: Biology

and function. Annu Rev Neurosci, 1984, 7:223–255.

Amir S. Anaphylactic shock: Catecholamine actions in the

responses to opioid antagonists. Prog Clin Biol Res, 1988,

264:265–274.

Anton RF. Naltrexone for the management of alcohol dependence.

N Engl J Med, 2008, 359:715–721.

Ashburn MA, Stephen RL, Ackerman E, et al. Iontophoretic

delivery of morphine for postoperative analgesia. J Pain

Symptom Manage, 1992, 7:27–33.

Atkinson RL. Opioid regulation of food intake and body weight

in humans. Fed Proc, 1987, 46:178–182.

Bailey CP, Connor M. Opioids: Cellular mechanisms of tolerance

and physical dependence. Curr Opin Pharmacol, 2005, 5:60–68.

Bailey PL, Stanley TH. Intravenous opioid anesthetics. In,

Anesthesia, 4th ed. (Miller RD, ed.) Churchill Livingstone,

New York, 1994, pp. 291–387.

Ballantyne JC, Loach AB, Carr DB. Itching after epidural and

spinal opiates. Pain, 1988, 33:149–160.

Beaver WT. Impact of non-narcotic oral analgesics on pain management.

Am J Med, 1988, 84:3–15.

Beers R, Camporesi E. Remifentanil update: Clinical science and

utility. CNS Drugs, 2004, 18:1085–1104.

Benedetti F, Amanzio M. The neurobiology of placebo analgesia:

From endogenous opioids to cholecystokinin. Prog

Neurobiol, 1997, 52:109–125.

Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, et al. Opioid complications

and side effects. Pain Physician, 2008, 11:S105–S120.

Bernards CM. Recent insights into the pharmacokinetics of

spinal opioids and the relevance to opioid selection. Curr Opin

Anaesthesiol, 2004, 17:441–447.

Bluet-Pajot MT, Tolle V, Zizzari P, et al. Growth hormone secretagogues

and hypothalamic networks. Endocrine, 2001, 14:1–8.

Boas RA, Villiger JW. Clinical actions of fentanyl and buprenorphine.

The significance of receptor binding. Br J Anaesth,

1985, 57:192–196.

Boysen K, Hertel S, Chraemmer-Jorgensen B, et al. Buprenorphine

antagonism of ventilatory depression following fentanyl anaesthesia.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1988, 32:490–492.

521

CHAPTER 18

OPIOIDS, ANALGESIA, AND PAIN MANAGEMENT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!