22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

have an arylsulfonamide structure and block the NaCl

co-transporter. Some of these are not benzothiadiazines

but have structural features and molecular functions that

are similar to the original benzothiadiazine compounds;

consequently, they are designated as members of the thiazide

class of diuretics. For example, chlorthalidone,

one of the non-benzothiadiazines, is widely used in the

treatment of hypertension, as is indapamide.

Regimen for Administration of the Thiazide-Class Diuretics

in Hypertension. Because members of the thiazide class

have similar pharmacological effects, they generally

have been viewed as interchangeable with appropriate

adjustment of dosage (see Chapter 25). However, the

pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these drugs

may differ, so they may not necessarily have the same

clinical efficacy in treating hypertension (Carter et al.,

2004). Indeed, there has been renewed debate about

whether or not this group of diuretics should be considered

as a class in terms of capacity to lower blood pressure

and also decrease adverse clinical events due to

hypertension (Sicca, 2006).

A direct comparison using 24-hour ambulatory

blood pressure monitoring suggested that the antihypertensive

efficacy of chlorthalidone is more favorable than

that of hydrochlorothiazide (Ernst et al., 2006).

Interestingly, the differences were primarily due to

greater antihypertensive efficacy during the night and not

with routine daytime office measurements of blood pressure.

It is possible that the greater effect at night arises on

account of the much longer t 1/2

of chlorthalidone (>24

hours) compared to hydrochlorothiaze (several hours).

In light of the considerable clinical trial data supporting

the capacity of chlorthalidone to diminish adverse cardiovascular

events—in comparison to that available for

currently used low doses of hydrochlorothiazide—there

is a growing concern that chlorthalidone may be an

underutilized drug in hypertensives requiring a diuretic.

When a thiazide-class diuretic is utilized as the sole antihypertensive

drug (monotherapy), its dose-response curve for lowering

blood pressure in patients with hypertension should be kept in mind.

Antihypertensive effects can be achieved in many patients with as little

as 12.5 mg daily of chlorthalidone or hydrochlorothiazide.

Furthermore, when used as monotherapy, the maximal daily dose of

thiazide-class diuretics usually should not exceed 25 mg of

hydrochlorothiazide or chlorthalidone (or equivalent). Even though

more diuresis can be achieved with higher doses of these diuretics,

some evidence suggests that doses higher than this are not generally

more efficacious in lowering blood pressure in patients with normal

renal function. For example, a large study comparing 25 and 50 mg

of hydrochlorothiazide daily in an elderly population did not show a

greater decrease in blood pressure with the larger dose (Medical

Research Council Working Party, 1987). However, these conclusions

are based on conventional rather than ambulatory blood pressure

measurements. Other studies suggest that low doses of hydrochlorothiazide

have inadequate effects on blood pressure when monitored in

this more detailed manner (Lacourcière et al., 1995). In summary,

recent critical attention has been focused on whether low doses of

hydrochlorothiazide are as efficacious as low doses of chlorthalidone

and whether low doses of hydrochlorothiazide are efficacious as

monotherapy in protecting against the cardiovascular complications

of hypertension. Relatively low doses of either thiazide are not at the

top of the dose-response curve for adverse effects such as K + wasting

and inhibition of uric acid excretion, emphasizing the importance of

knowledge about the dose-response relationships for both beneficial

and adverse effects.

In the clinical trials of antihypertensive therapy in the elderly

that demonstrated the best outcomes in cardiovascular morbidity and

mortality, 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide or chlorthalidone was the

maximum dose given; if this dose did not achieve the target blood

pressure reduction, treatment with a second drug was initiated (SHEP

Cooperative Research Group, 1991; Dahlöf et al., 1991; Medical

Research Council Working Party, 1992). With respect to safety, a

case-control study (Siscovick et al., 1994) found a dose-dependent

increase in the occurrence of sudden death at doses of hydrochlorothiazide

>25 mg daily. This finding supports the hypothesis proposed

by the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group

(1982), suggesting that increased cardiovascular mortality is associated

with higher diuretic doses. Taken together, clinical studies indicate

that if adequate blood pressure reduction is not achieved with

the 25-mg daily dose of hydrochlorothiazide or chlorthalidone, a

second drug should be added rather than increasing the dose of

diuretic. There is some concern that thiazide diuretics, especially at

higher doses and in the absence of K + -sparing diuretics or K + supplements,

may increase the risk of sudden death. However, their

overall therapeutic benefits are well established.

Urinary K + loss can be a problem with thiazides.

ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists will

attenuate diuretic-induced loss of K + to some degree,

and this is a consideration if a second drug is required to

achieve further blood pressure reduction beyond that

attained with the diuretic alone. Because the diuretic and

hypotensive effects of these drugs are greatly enhanced

when they are given in combination, care should be

taken to initiate combination therapy with low doses of

each of these drugs. Administration of ACE inhibitors

or angiotensin receptor antagonists together with other

K + -sparing agents or with K + supplements requires great

caution; combining K + -sparing agents with each other

or with K + supplementation can cause potentially dangerous

hyperkalemia in some patients.

In contrast to the limitation on the dose of thiazideclass

diuretics used as monotherapy, the treatment of

severe hypertension that is unresponsive to three or more

drugs may require larger doses of the thiazide-class

diuretics. Indeed, hypertensive patients may become

769

CHAPTER 27

TREATMENT OF MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA AND HYPERTENSION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!