22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

pharmacology of these drugs is presented earlier in this

chapter. The basis for their use in hypertension comes

from the understanding that hypertension generally is

the result of increased peripheral vascular resistance.

Because contraction of vascular smooth muscle is

dependent on the free intracellular concentration of

Ca 2+ , inhibition of transmembrane movement of Ca 2+

through voltage-sensitive Ca 2+ channels can decrease

the total amount of Ca 2+ that reaches intracellular sites.

Indeed, all of the Ca 2+ channel blockers lower blood

pressure by relaxing arteriolar smooth muscle and

decreasing peripheral vascular resistance (Weber, 2002).

As a consequence of a decrease in peripheral vascular

resistance, the Ca 2+ channel blockers evoke a

baroreceptor-mediated sympathetic discharge. In the

case of the dihydropyridines, tachycardia may occur

from the adrenergic stimulation of the SA node; this

response is generally quite modest except when the

drug is administered rapidly. Tachycardia is typically

minimal to absent with verapamil and diltiazem

because of the direct negative chronotropic effect of

these two drugs. Indeed, the concurrent use of a β

receptor antagonist drug may magnify negative

chronotropic effects of these drugs or cause heart block

in susceptible patients. Consequently, the concurrent

use of β receptor antagonists with either verapamil or

diltiazem may be problematic.

Ca 2+ channel blockers are effective when used

alone or in combination with other drugs for the treatment

of hypertension; this view has been strengthened

by a number of recent large clinical trials (Dahlöf et al.,

2005; Jamerson et al., 2008).

Oral administration of nifedipine as an approach to urgent

reduction of blood pressure has been abandoned. Sublingual administration

does not achieve the maximum plasma concentration any

more quickly than does oral administration. Moreover, in the absence

of deleterious consequences of high arterial pressure, data do not support

the rapid lowering of blood pressure. There is no place in the

treatment of hypertension for the use of nifedipine or other dihydropyridine

Ca 2+ channel blockers with short half-lives when administered

in a standard (immediate-release) formulation, because of the

oscillation in blood pressure and concurrent surges in sympathetic

reflex activity within each dosage interval. As noted earlier, parenteral

administration of the novel dihydropyridine clevidipine may be useful

in treating severe or perioperative hypertension.

Compared with other classes of antihypertensive agents,

there may be a greater frequency of achieving blood pressure control

with Ca 2+ channel blockers as monotherapy in elderly subjects

and in African-Americans, population groups in which the low renin

status is more prevalent. However, intrasubject variability is more

important than relatively small differences between population

groups. Ca 2+ channel blockers are effective in lowering blood pressure

and decreasing cardiovascular events in the elderly with isolated

systolic hypertension (Staessen et al., 1997). Indeed, these drugs

may be a preferred treatment in patients with isolated systolic

hypertension.

ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING

ENZYME INHIBITORS

Angiotensin II is an important regulator of cardiovascular

function (see Chapter 26). The ability to reduce levels

of AngII with orally effective inhibitors of ACE

represents an important advance in the treatment of

hypertension. Captopril was the first such agent to be

developed for the treatment of hypertension. Since then,

enalapril, lisinopril, quinapril, ramipril, benazepril,

moexipril, fosinopril, trandolapril, and perindopril also

have become available. These drugs have proven to

be very useful for the treatment of hypertension because

of their efficacy and their very favorable profile of

adverse effects, which enhances patient adherence.

Chapter 26 presents the pharmacology of ACE inhibitors

in detail.

The ACE inhibitors appear to confer a special

advantage in the treatment of patients with diabetes,

slowing the development and progression of diabetic

glomerulopathy. They also are effective in slowing the

progression of other forms of chronic renal disease,

such as glomerulosclerosis, and many of these patients

also have hypertension. An ACE inhibitor is the preferred

initial agent in these patients. Patients with

hypertension and ischemic heart disease are candidates

for treatment with ACE inhibitors; administration of

ACE inhibitors in the immediate post-MI period has

been shown to improve ventricular function and reduce

morbidity and mortality (see Chapter 28).

The endocrine consequences of inhibiting the

biosynthesis of AngII are of importance in a number

of facets of hypertension treatment. Because ACE

inhibitors blunt the rise in aldosterone concentrations

in response to Na + loss, the normal role of aldosterone

to oppose diuretic-induced natriuresis is diminished.

Consequently, ACE inhibitors tend to enhance the efficacy

of diuretic drugs. This means that even very small

doses of diuretics may substantially improve the antihypertensive

efficacy of ACE inhibitors; conversely,

the use of high doses of diuretics together with ACE

inhibitors may lead to excessive reduction in blood

pressure and to Na + loss in some patients.

The attenuation of aldosterone production by ACE

inhibitors also influences K + homeostasis. There is only

a very small and clinically unimportant rise in serum

K + when these agents are used alone in patients with

777

CHAPTER 27

TREATMENT OF MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA AND HYPERTENSION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!