22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1652 diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. These are less frequent and less

severe than those reported with the 600 mg twice-daily standard dose

of ritonavir but more common compared to those of boosted

atazanavir and darunavir. The most common laboratory abnormalities

include elevated total cholesterol and triglycerides. Because the

same adverse effects occur with ritonavir, it is unclear whether these

side effects are due to ritonavir, lopinavir, or both.

SECTION VII

CHEMOTHERAPY OF MICROBIAL DISEASES

Precautions and Interactions. Because lopinavir metabolism is

highly dependent on CYP3A4, concomitant administration of agents

that induce CYP3A4, such as rifampin, may lower plasma lopinavir

concentrations considerably. St. John’s wort is a known inducer of

CYP3A4, leading to lower concentrations of lopinavir and possible

loss of antiviral effectiveness. Co-administration of other antiretrovirals

that can induce CYP3A4, including amprenavir, nevirapine or

efavirenz, may require increasing the dose of lopinavir (Oldfield and

Plosker, 2006).

Although lopinavir is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4 in vitro, the

ritonavir in the co-formulated capsule strongly inhibits CYP3A4 activity

and probably dwarfs any lopinavir effect. The liquid formulation of

lopinavir contains 42% ethanol and should not be administered with

disulfiram or metronidazole (Chapter 23). Ritonavir is also a moderate

CYP inducer at the dose employed in the co-formulation and can

adversely decrease concentrations of some co-administered drugs (e.g.,

oral contraceptives). There is no direct proof that lopinavir is a CYP

inducer in vivo; however, concentrations of some co-administered drugs

(e.g., amprenavir and phenytoin) are lower with the lopinavir/ritonavir

co-formulation than would have been expected with low-dose ritonavir

alone (Oldfield and Plosker, 2006).

Therapeutic Use. In comparative clinical trials, lopinavir

has antiretroviral activity at least comparable with that

of other potent HIV protease inhibitors and better than

that of nelfinavir. Lopinavir also has considerable and

sustained antiretroviral activity in patients who failed

previous HIV protease inhibitor–containing regimens.

In one study, 70 subjects who had failed therapy with one

previous HIV protease inhibitor were treated for 2 weeks with

lopinavir, followed by the addition of nevirapine. At 48 weeks, 60%

of subjects had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/mL despite

substantial phenotypic resistance to other HIV protease inhibitors

(Oldfield and Plosker, 2006). Because plasma concentrations of

lopinavir generally are much higher than those required to suppress

HIV replication in vitro, the drug may be capable of suppressing

HIV isolates with low-level protease inhibitor resistance.

The adult lopinavir/ritonavir dose is 400/100 mg (two tablets)

twice daily, or 800/200 mg (four tablets) once daily, with or without

food. Lopinavir/ritonavir should not be dosed once daily in treatment-experienced

patients. Lopinavir/ritonavir is approved for use in

pediatric patients ≥14 days, with dosing based on either weight or

body surface area. A pediatric tablet formulation is available for use

in children >6 months of age.

Atazanavir

Chemistry and Antiviral Activity. Atazanavir is an azapeptide

protease inhibitor with a C 2

-symmetrical

chemical structure that is active against both HIV-1 and

HIV-2 (Croom et al., 2009) (Figure 59–6). The IC 50

for

HIV-1 in various in vitro assays ranges from 2 to 15 nM.

In the presence of 40% human serum, the in vitro IC 50

is increased 3- to 4-fold (Croom et al., 2009).

Mechanisms of Resistance. The primary atazanavir

resistance mutation occurs at HIV protease codon 50

and confers abut a 9-fold decreased susceptibility. This

isoleucine-to-leucine substitution (I50L) is distinct

from the isoleucine-to-valine substitution selected by

fosamprenavir and darunavir.

This mutation was present in 100% of viruses isolated from

patients failing therapy in one clinical trial (Croom et al., 2009).

Isolates with only this mutation are still susceptible to inhibition by

other protease inhibitors. Sensitivity to atazanavir is affected by various

primary and secondary mutations that accumulate in patients

who have failed other HIV protease inhibitors, with high-level resistance

more likely if five or more additional mutations are present

(Croom et al., 2009).

Absorption, Distribution, and Elimination. Atazanavir is absorbed

rapidly after oral administration, with peak concentrations occurring

~2 hours after dosing. Atazanavir absorption is sensitive to food: a

light meal increases the AUC by 70%, whereas a high-fat meal

increases the AUC by 35% (Croom et al., 2009). It is therefore recommended

that the drug be administered with food, which also

decreases the interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics, unless

given with ritonavir. Absorption is pH dependent, and proton pump

inhibitors or other acid-reducing agents substantially reduce

atazanavir concentrations after oral dosing; this effect is only partially

reversed by concomitant ritonavir.

Atazanavir undergoes oxidative metabolism in the liver primarily

by CYP3A4, which accounts for most of the elimination of

this drug. Only 7% of the parent drug is excreted unchanged in the

urine. The mean elimination t 1/2

of atazanavir at the standard 400-mg

once-daily dose is ~7 hours; however, the drug has nonlinear pharmacokinetics,

and the t 1/2

increases to nearly 10 hours at a dose of

600 mg (Croom et al., 2009). Atazanavir is 86% bound to plasma

proteins, both to albumin and α 1

-acid glycoprotein. It is present in

CSF at <3% of plasma concentrations but has excellent penetration

into seminal fluid (Croom et al., 2009).

Untoward Effects. Like indinavir, atazanavir frequently causes

unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia, although this is mainly a cosmetic

side effect and not associated with hepatotoxicity.

Approximately 40% of subjects receiving 400 mg atazanavir

once daily in initial clinical trials developed a significant increase in

total bilirubin (Croom et al., 2009), although only 5% developed jaundice.

This is a consequence of inhibition of UDP-glucuronosyl transferase

by atazanavir, and the side effect occurs more prominently in

those who are genetically deficient in this enzyme, e.g., patients with

Gilbert’s syndrome (Rotger et al., 2005). Postmarketing reports

include hepatic adverse reactions of cholecystitis, cholelithiasis,

cholestasis, and other hepatic function abnormalities.

Other side effects reported with atazanavir include diarrhea

and nausea, mainly during the first few weeks of therapy. Overall,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!